I make commercials that come entirely out of the computer. Idea to finished film in two days, with models who don’t exist and music nobody played.

The question I get most often isn’t “can you do that?” It’s: “With what?”

This is the answer. 137 tools, sorted by what you want to do — not by what they technically are. For each task I tell you which one I’d take, and you filter for what matters to you: free, no sign-up, commercial use.

Find your AI stack

Four questions, then I'll tell you which tools I'd start with in your place. No sign-up, nothing stored.

What do you want to do? Pick as many as you like
Budget?
How experienced are you?
Any of these required? (optional)

What I measure against

Am I allowed to sell the result? The most important question, and the one asked least. For a commercial, “I think so” isn’t an answer. Where I can prove it, it says so on the card. Where I can’t, it says nothing — nothing gets guessed here.

Does the face stay the same? One image is easy. Twelve images of the same person carrying the same bag is the craft.

What does a failed attempt cost? You throw away more than you keep. A tool where every attempt hurts is a tool you don’t use.

Create images

A sentence in, an image out — ads, concepts, illustration.

★ My pick Google Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) — Das erste, was man jemandem in die Hand drückt: läuft in der Gemini-App auf Deutsch, versteht Bearbeitungs-Anweisungen im Gespräch und hält Gesichter, Produkte und Schrift über eine ganze Bildserie durch.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

34 tools

Google Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)

Google's top image model built on Gemini 3 Pro, leading on editing, text rendering, and holding faces and products across image series.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
  • German
Details

Brand commercials with a recurring face or product; conversational image editing; anything with type in the image (multilingual too).

For it

  • Best preservation of identity/character across an image series — per tests, up to 5 subjects consistent, 8–10 consecutive edits stable
  • Leads the image editing arenas; conversational editing leaves the rest of the image alone
  • Text rendering including long passages and non-Latin scripts — decisive for ads with a claim
  • 4K output; the batch API halves the price

Against it

  • Identity drifts after ~8–10 edits; you have to re-anchor to the original reference image regularly
  • Free Gemini usage heavily capped (3 generations/day at low resolution per community reports)
  • Google-typical strict content filters

Pricing: Consumer: Google AI Plus $4.99/mo., AI Pro $19.99/mo., AI Ultra from $99.99/mo. (as of July 2026; Ultra was cut from $249.99 to $99.99 at I/O 2026) — Nano Banana Pro is included in Pro and Ultra. API: approx. $0.134/image (1K–2K) and approx. $0.24/image (4K); Artificial Analysis lists $134/1000 images — consistent. Batch API: 50% discount. Source: gemini.google/subscriptions + OpenRouter/pricepertoken.

Sources: gemini.google · openrouter.ai · pricepertoken.com · support.google.com

Replicate

Marketplace and hosting for thousands of public AI models you can run via API with one line of code — plus deploy your own models.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

Trying out a new model fast before you take it into production somewhere else. The catalog is the strength.

For it

  • Largest open model catalog in the category; the community pushes new models in very fast
  • Best documentation of the developer platforms
  • Your own models/fine-tunes can be hosted as a private deployment
  • Startup program with $1,000–10,000 in credits (non-dilutive, no VC needed)

Against it

  • Usually more expensive than fal for the same models
  • Private models also cost setup and idle time, not just compute time
  • No free tier on the pricing page

Pricing: Pay-per-use, two modes: (a) by time — CPU (Small) $0.000025/sec ($0.09/h) · Nvidia T4 $0.000225/sec ($0.81/h) · A100 80 GB $0.001400/sec ($5.04/h) · H100 $0.001525/sec ($5.49/h); (b) by input/output — e.g. Claude 3.7 Sonnet $3.00 per million input tokens. Private models: the entire instance runtime is billed.

Sources: replicate.com · replicate.com · ycombinator.com

Magnific (ehemals Freepik) Advertising *

The former Freepik platform: stock library plus a complete AI suite (image, video, audio, upscaling, editor) — united under the name Magnific since 04/28/2026.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
  • EU
Details

The all-rounder for people who need stock, image generation and upscaling in one subscription — agency and marketing day-to-day.

For it

  • ⚠️ IMPORTANT: Freepik has been called Magnific since 04/28/2026 — freepik.com redirects to magnific.com. Anyone still linking "Freepik" is linking a dead brand name
  • Combines stock assets (250M+), AI generation, the Magnific upscaler and a collaborative workspace
  • Over 1M paying subscribers, $230M ARR, bootstrapped and profitable — no startup failure risk
  • On Premium+/Pro around 10 image models generate without consuming credits

Against it

  • Credit system across the whole suite: video/audio always consume credits, even on the most expensive plan
  • The rebrand is fresh — docs, links and third-party sources are still inconsistent in places

Pricing: Free tier available (limited daily access, per the docs ~20 generations/day, 10 downloads/day, personal use only with attribution). Paid tiers per official docs (AI credits): Premium 20,000/month or 240,000/year · Premium+ 45,000/month or 600,000/year · Pro 300,000/month or 4M/year · Business 45,000 per seat/month · Enterprise custom. Prices per third-party sources approx. $14.50 (Premium), $33.75 (Premium+), $210 (Pro) monthly when paid annually — not officially retrievable, check yourself.

Sources: magnific.com · magnific.com · thenextweb.com · tech.eu

Higgsfield AI

Video-first aggregator: bundles 15+ video and image models (Sora, Veo, Kling, Wan, Seedance, Hailuo …) under one subscription, with camera movements and effect presets as its differentiator.

  • Free tier
  • watermark
Details

AI video production without code, when you want to compare several models and control camera moves.

For it

  • One subscription for the major video models instead of five separate ones
  • Camera presets and motion controls — exactly the language film people speak
  • Plus "Higgsfield Earn": pays creators directly for high-performing AI videos on Instagram (up to $1,000 on day one, max. $2,500 lifetime per video, per the official site)

Against it

  • Per third-party sources, credits expire 90 days after purchase and don't roll into the following month — an expensive trap
  • Per third-party sources, monthly billing costs 50–60% more than annual
  • The pricing page serves no machine-readable figures — everything below is sourced from third parties

Pricing: ⚠️ Not officially verifiable — higgsfield.ai/pricing serves no pricing table when fetched. Per third-party sources (annual billing): Starter $15/month (200 credits), Plus $39/month (1,000 credits), Ultra $99/month (3,000 credits, scalable up to 9,000), plus team plans. Credit packs approx. $5 per 100 credits, valid for 90 days. Check for yourself before recommending.

Sources: higgsfield.ai · higgsfield.ai · higgsfield.ai · startuphub.ai

Poe (Quora)

Chat interface that makes thousands of AI models and bots accessible under one subscription — LLMs, image and video models via a shared points system.

  • Free tier
Details

One subscription to test all the major chat models side by side without paying for five subscriptions.

For it

  • One subscription for GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.5, Veo, Sora, and thousands of other bots
  • Very fine-grained pricing tiers — entry from $4.17/month (annual billing)
  • Build and publish your own bots; bot creators can earn a share
  • Group chats with several models at once

Against it

  • Compute points are hard to keep track of — you don't know in advance how far you'll get
  • Second choice for media production: it's a chat interface, not a production tool
  • No visible free tier on the plan page

Pricing: Per poe.com/subscription_plans (annual billing, 17% savings): Basic $4.17/month (10,000 points) · Standard $16.67/month (660,000 points) · Professional $41.67/month (1.65M) · Business $83.33/month (3.3M) · Enterprise $208.33/month (8.25M). Monthly billing is more expensive (third-party sources cite, among others, $19.99 for the Standard tier). Different models consume different amounts of points per message.

Sources: poe.com · poe.com · costbench.com

Pollo AI

Consumer aggregator for AI video: bundles Kling, Runway, Hailuo, Vidu, Hunyuan, and its own models in one interface, plus an API platform.

  • Free tier
Details

For it

  • One subscription for the major video models, without paying each provider separately
  • Also usable as an API platform (pollo.ai/api-platform)
  • Free credits on sign-up

Against it

  • Cookie duration not findable
  • Minimum payout $100, billing only between the 10th and 15th of the following month
  • Brand is less established than Higgsfield or Krea — a trust question when recommending it

Pricing: Subscription model with credits, tiers at pollo.ai/pricing (free credits on sign-up). Concrete amounts not machine-retrievable — check yourself before recommending. No figures here because unverified.

Sources: pollo.ai · polloai.tapfiliate.com · pollo.ai · pollo.ai

Higgsfield

Aggregator platform focused on cinematic camera movement and VFX for social content — bundles third-party top models (Kling, Veo, Nano Banana Pro) under one interface.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

For it

  • Camera movement presets that otherwise have to be laboriously prompted
  • One subscription, many models — Kling 3.0, Veo, Nano Banana Pro under one roof
  • Plus "Higgsfield Earn": pays creators directly for posting AI videos (up to $2,500 lifetime per video)

Against it

  • It's a layer on top, not a frontier model of its own — you pay a markup on other people's models
  • Credits expire monthly, no rollover
  • Very social-/short-form-heavy — less deep than Runway for long brand commercials

Pricing: WARNING: the official pricing page serves no content to automated clients; figures from secondary sources (as of 2026, after the rename from Basic/Pro/Ultimate to Starter/Plus/Ultra): Starter ~$15/month (annual) with 200 credits/month · Plus ~$39/month (annual) with 1,000 credits, all models, parallel generations · Ultra ~$99/month (annual) with 3,000 credits · additional credit packs ~$5/100 credits. Credits expire monthly. Sources: https://www.scopeful.org/tools/higgsfield · https://flowith.io/blog/higgsfield-pricing-2026-free-vs-creator-vs-studio/ · https://higgsfield.ai/pricing (official)

Sources: higgsfield.ai · x.com · adskull.io · startuphub.ai

Freepik (AI Video Suite)

Aggregator that bundles the top models (Veo 3, Kling, Runway Gen-4

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
  • EU
Details

For it

  • You don't need five subscriptions to compare the models
  • Routing engine sends a shot to whichever model fits it

Against it

  • Markup over using the models directly; power users are better off with a direct subscription
  • Less granular control than the original interfaces (Runway/Flow)
  • Cookie duration also stated inconsistently (30 vs. 60 days)

Pricing: unverified — the current subscription tiers for the Freepik AI suite could not be cleanly verified in this research. Check https://www.freepik.com/pricing before publishing and cite with a date. Only the feature scope is verified: the subscription includes Google Veo 3, Kling, Runway Gen-4.5, MiniMax Hailuo, PixVerse, Wan and LTX-2 Pro, among others. Source: https://freepik.app/en

Sources: freepik.app · affiliateprogramdb.com · openaffiliate.dev · affiliateotter.com

Adobe Firefly (Video)

Adobe's video generation — not the best image quality, but the only one with real IP indemnification. For brand commercials, it's the rights argument.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
Details

For it

  • The ONLY model with real IP indemnification: Adobe defends paying customers against copyright lawsuits over generated content
  • Trained on licensed and public domain material — no stolen training set
  • Does NOT train on customer data
  • Embedded directly in the Creative Cloud workflow (Premiere, After Effects)

Against it

  • Quality clearly below Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0 — you're buying legal certainty, not image quality
  • The indemnification has holes: it does NOT apply if the prompt names a third-party brand or a named artist, or if you upload a reference image you don't have rights to
  • Cookie only 30 days

Pricing: Firefly Standard $9.99/month (2,000 generative credits) · Firefly Pro $29.99/month (7,000 credits). IP indemnification for paid Firefly and Creative Cloud plans. Source: https://fluxnote.io/guides/adobe-firefly-ai-video-generator-review · https://business.adobe.com/products/firefly-business/firefly-ai-approach.html (official, on indemnification)

Sources: adobe.com · business.adobe.com · licenseorg.com · fluxnote.io

OpenAI GPT Image 2

OpenAI's current image model, in ChatGPT and via the API; per blind arena results, long the number one for prompt adherence.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
Details

Images that need to show exactly what the prompt says — complex scenes, many elements, text in the image. The most reliable "I describe it, you deliver it" generator.

For it

  • Best prompt adherence in the field — debuted with the largest lead in the history of the Artificial Analysis image arena (Elo 1,339 from 13,405 blind comparisons)
  • Very strong text rendering
  • Usable via ChatGPT with no technical hurdle — the lowest barrier to entry there is
  • The low quality tier is extremely cheap (roughly $0.005/image) — good for mass iteration

Against it

  • Reference images are always processed at high fidelity → edit workflows quickly cost 2–3x
  • The high quality tier is expensive at up to ~$0.21/image
  • Aesthetically often "safe"; for art direction many people still reach for Midjourney

Pricing: API is token-based: $5/M text input, $8/M image input, $10/M text output, $30/M image output. Per image in practice roughly $0.005 (low), roughly $0.04–0.05 (medium), roughly $0.165–0.211 (high). Batch API −50%. Consumer access via ChatGPT subscription. Source: OpenAI docs + pricing calculators (costgoat, WaveSpeed).

Sources: platform.openai.com · costgoat.com · wavespeed.ai · llm-stats.com

Ideogram

The typography specialist: the model that first genuinely mastered text in images — logos, posters, packaging, anything with text.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

Anything with letters: posters, ad creatives with a claim, logo drafts, packaging mockups.

For it

  • Historically the best text rendering; still strong today on logo and poster layouts
  • Very cheap entry (Basic from approx. $7–8/month)
  • Free tier available (10 slow credits/week)
  • Good balance of design understanding and image quality

Against it

  • The lead on text is gone — Nano Banana Pro, GPT Image 2 and Riverflow now render type just as well or better. Ideogram needs to reposition.
  • Pricing figures differ by source (Basic $7 vs. $8, Plus $15 vs. $20, Pro $42 vs. $60) — Ideogram changes its plans frequently
  • Free tier with 10 credits/week is practically useless

Pricing: INCONSISTENT across sources — Ideogram changes its plans often. Cited figures: Free (10 slow credits/week, resets Saturdays 00:00 UTC), Basic approx. $7–8/month, Plus approx. $15–20/month, Team approx. $20/user/month, Pro approx. $42–60/month (incl. API). Annual plan saves 25–30%. Ideogram itself explicitly warns in its docs against trusting static pricing tables — only ideogram.ai/pricing is binding. For the site: link to the live pricing page, don't write a hard figure.

Sources: ideogram.ai · docs.ideogram.ai · openaffiliate.dev · ideogram.ai

Recraft

The designer's generator: the only one seriously producing real VECTORS (SVG) instead of pixels — plus consistent brand styles.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

Logos, icons, illustrations, and anything that has to scale infinitely. The only generator whose output lives on directly in Illustrator.

For it

  • Real vector output (SVG) — unmatched in this list
  • Trainable custom styles → consistent visual language across an entire brand world
  • Very strong at icon sets and illustration systems
  • Cheap entry point (Basic $10/month)

Against it

  • ⚠️ THE FREE PLAN IS A TRAP: images from the free plan BELONG TO RECRAFT, are publicly visible in the community gallery, and may NOT be used commercially. Highlight this in bold on the page.
  • Photorealism weaker than the frontier models — Recraft is a design tool, not a photo tool
  • Credit system burns through fast

Pricing: Free: 50 credits/day — BUT WITHOUT commercial rights, images belong to Recraft. Basic $10/month (1,000 credits, annually $120/year) incl. commercial rights + private generation. Advanced $27/month (4,000 credits). Pro $48/month (8,400 credits, incl. video, priority). Extra credits $2 per 200. Annual billing up to −20%. Teams/Enterprise on request. Source: recraft.ai/pricing + recraft.ai/docs/plans-and-billing/paid-plans.

Sources: recraft.ai · recraft.ai · recraft.ai · recraft.ai

Leonardo.ai

Once one of the most popular all-round tools with a strong free tier, increasingly absorbed into Canva since the Canva acquisition.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Beginners with a Canva subscription; game assets and concept art.

For it

  • Generous free tier with daily free credits
  • Train your own models (Elements, Custom Models) — good for consistent styles
  • Full access to the Leonardo Essential plan is included in Canva Business/Enterprise — free for Canva users
  • Good community, many presets, low barrier to entry

Against it

  • Quality-wise left behind by the frontier models
  • Unclear product future after the Canva acquisition — much is migrating into Canva
  • Confusing credit mechanics

Pricing: Free tier with daily credits; paid tiers above it. Leonardo Essential is included in Canva Business/Enterprise. I could not verify concrete current subscription prices from an official source — unverified, check leonardo.ai/pricing before publishing.

Sources: intercom.help · leonardo.ai · canva.com · canva.com

Reve

Layout-oriented image model with native 4K output — thinks in composition and text blocks rather than just subjects.

  • Free tier
Details

Graphics-heavy work: posters, ad layouts, anything with a lot of text and defined image architecture. Native 4K without upscaling.

For it

  • Native 4K output — saves the upscaling step
  • Layout-first: understands image structure, not just subjects
  • Very cheap: Pro at $19.99/mo undercuts nearly the whole field
  • Transparent API pricing (Create approx. $0.024/image)

Against it

  • Small provider, low profile — thin community, little learning material
  • The "energy" system as a billing unit is less transparent than plain credits
  • No top spot in the major blind arenas

Pricing: Free (starting allowance + daily refresh), Lite $7.99/mo (approx. 5× the Free energy), Pro $19.99/mo (approx. 100× the Free energy + a monthly video allowance). API separate via the Reve console: minimum purchase $10 = 7,500 credits; Create 18 credits (approx. $0.024), Edit 30 credits (approx. $0.04), Remix 30 credits (approx. $0.04). Source: app.reve.com/pricing + help.reve.com.

Sources: app.reve.com · help.reve.com · eesel.ai · eesel.ai

ImagineArt

  • Free tier
Details

Substantively, a solid all-round point of access to several models for price-sensitive beginners.

For it

  • Explicitly open to small channels and new sites too — low barrier to entry
  • Handled via Impact (professional tracking, reliable payouts)
  • Wide price range ($6.99 to over $100/month) → high order values possible too

Against it

  • Not a leader on substance — anyone who wants the best goes straight to Nano Banana Pro, GPT Image 2 or Midjourney. That has to be stated honestly on the site.
  • Cookie duration stated inconsistently (30 vs. 60 days) — clarify before publishing
  • No models of its own

Pricing: Plans per the provider from $6.99/month to over $100/month. I was unable to verify the exact tiers from a reliable source — unsubstantiated, check on imagine.art before publishing.

Sources: imagine.art · imagine.art · app.impact.com · flexoffers.com

Photoroom

Photo editing for product shots and e-commerce: background removal, AI backgrounds, shadows, retouching — as an app and as an API.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
  • EU
Details

For it

  • Clean program via Awin — professional tracking, clear terms
  • Generous free tier: 250 exports/month
  • Startup program with 60,000 free images for qualifying companies

Against it

  • Double approval needed (Awin account AND Photoroom)
  • Only a 30-day cookie

Pricing: Free 250 exports/month (background remover, retouching, templates). Paid: Pro, Max, Ultra, Enterprise — the official pricing page loads the amounts via script and does not serve them statically; circulating figures (Pro ~$7.99, Max ~$26.99, Ultra from ~$99/month) are UNVERIFIED here and should be checked by hand before publication. API confirmed: Basic $0.02/image from $20/month, Plus $0.10/image from $100/month, Partner $0.01/image from $1,000/month. (Source: photoroom.com/api/pricing)

Sources: photoroom.com · ui.awin.com · photoroom.com · photoroom.com

Luma AI

Video and image generation (Ray models, formerly "Dream Machine") plus 3D capture/NeRF — now positioned as an agentic creative platform.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

For it

  • Bundles its own and third-party models (Kling, Veo, Seedance, Seedream, ElevenLabs) under one interface — one subscription, many models
  • Includes utilities like background removal, upscaling, reframing
  • The 3D capture roots (NeRF) are still relevant for film people
  • Annual payment saves around 20%

Against it

  • NO free tier on the pricing page anymore — entry starts at $30/month
  • Expensive at the top end: Ultra costs $300/month

Pricing: No free tier listed. Plus $30/mo or $25/mo on the annual plan ($300/year) = 10,000 credits · Pro $90/mo or $75/mo annually ($900/year) = 40,000 credits · Ultra $300/mo or $250/mo annually ($3,000/year) = 150,000 credits · Team and Enterprise on request. (Source: lumalabs.ai/pricing)

Sources: lumalabs.ai · lumalabs.ai · openaffiliate.dev

Krea

Creative interface that bundles many image, video and 3D models under one UI — with real-time canvas, upscaling and your own LoRA training.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

The one subscription if you're a creative who wants to try many image/video models without coding.

For it

  • Over 60 models in one interface, one shared credit currency ("compute units") instead of 10 subscriptions
  • Real-time generation (realtime canvas) — you watch the image come into being as you draw
  • Generous free tier: 100 compute units per day, refreshed daily, no credit card
  • Covers image, video, 3D, lipsync, LoRA training and upscaling — the complete package for film people

Against it

  • Credit system obscures what a generation actually costs
  • Monthly credits expire; purchased packs after 90 days
  • Pricing page blocks automated requests — the figures below are partly only backed by secondary sources

Pricing: Free: 100 compute units per day (refilled daily). Paid according to third-party sources: Basic ~$9/month, Pro ~$35/month, Max ~$70/month, Business ~$200/month, plus Enterprise. ⚠️ The included unit amounts contradict each other between third-party sources (Max: 40,000 vs. 60,000 units) — the official page krea.ai/pricing blocks bots. Check yourself before recommending; do NOT present the numbers as verified.

Sources: krea.ai · costbench.com · tooljunction.io

Midjourney (Video)

The image market leader with a video model bolted on: unmatched aesthetics in stills, video as animation derived from them — no audio, short clips.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

Designing the look: Midjourney for the perfect source image, then image-to-video in Kling or Veo. That's actually how most good AI spots are made.

For it

  • Aesthetically the most distinctive visual language on the market — unbeatable as a source image for image-to-video
  • GPU-time model instead of credits: unlimited in Relax mode (Standard/Pro/Mega), just slower
  • Stealth mode (Pro/Mega) for private generation — relevant for NDA brand projects
  • Unused extra hours don't expire ($4/hour)

Against it

  • No native audio — unlike Veo, Kling, Seedance, LTX-2
  • Short clips (~5 sec per job)
  • Video costs ~8× as much GPU time as an image job — the Basic plan (3.3 GPU hours) is practically useless for video

Pricing: Basic $10/mo (3.3 fast GPU hours) · Standard $30/mo (15 hrs) · Pro $60/mo (30 hrs) · Mega $120/mo (60 hrs). Annual billing −20% ($8/24/48/96). Billed by GPU time, not per image: one still ≈ 1 GPU minute, one HD video batch ≈ 26 GPU minutes. Extra hours $4/hr, never expire. Sources: https://docs.midjourney.com/hc/en-us/articles/27870484040333-Comparing-Midjourney-Plans · https://www.eesel.ai/blog/midjourney-pricing

Sources: docs.midjourney.com · eesel.ai · fluxnote.io

Sourceful Riverflow 2.0 / 2.5

Agentic image and editing model that corrects itself — multiple iterations per job until the result lands.

  • Paid only
Details

Advertising and product images where reliability matters more than 20 attempts — plus anything requiring exact typography (font control).

For it

  • Agentic self-correction across multiple iterations → high first-try hit rate
  • Font control: real typeface control instead of guessed letters
  • 1K/2K/4K, 10+ aspect ratios, transparent backgrounds

Against it

  • Most expensive model in the comparison: $150/1000 images
  • Small vendor, little community, barely any tutorials — you have to work out the knowledge yourself
  • Prices/plans not openly listed, enterprise-heavy ("Talk to sales")

Pricing: $150/1000 images (= $0.15/image) according to Artificial Analysis — a premium position above GPT Image 1.5 ($133/1k), Nano Banana Pro ($134/1k), and FLUX.2 [max] ($70/1k generation). Access via riverflow.ai as well as API through Runware, Replicate, and OpenRouter. No subscription plans of its own are listed on the website — unverified.

Sources: riverflow.ai · riverflow.ai · x.com · artificialanalysis.ai

ByteDance Seedream 5.0

ByteDance's (TikTok) image model family — Pro since 2026-07-08, Lite since February 2026. Price-performance winner for high-quality images at volume.

  • Paid only
Details

A lot of output for little money — ad creatives in variants, infographics, multi-reference fusion (Lite handles up to 14 reference images).

For it

  • Very cheap for the quality: Lite $0.035/image, Pro $0.075/image
  • Lite takes up to 14 reference images — strong for product/character consistency at a bargain price
  • Pro targets dense infographics, precise editing and photographic realism
  • Reasoning-based — understands complex image briefs

Against it

  • ByteDance/China: a real compliance issue with brand and public-sector clients in Germany — data outflow, censorship questions. Name it honestly.
  • Documentation and usage rights thin in English; commercial terms less clear than with Western providers
  • Content filters of Chinese character (politically sensitive subjects)

Pricing: Seedream 5.0 Pro (released 2026-07-08): $0.075/image up to 2.36 MP; on WaveSpeed from $0.045/run, scales with parameters. Seedream 5.0 Lite: $0.035/image, up to 14 reference images. Source: seed.bytedance.com + WaveSpeed/OpenRouter/Vercel price lists.

Sources: seed.bytedance.com · seed.bytedance.com · wavespeed.ai · openrouter.ai

Krea AI

Creative suite for image, video and 3D with a real-time canvas — you paint roughly, the AI renders along live. The most tactile tool in the field.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

Iterative, hands-on creative work instead of prompt lottery: real-time canvas, style transfer, enhancement. Ideal for film people to find a look fast.

For it

  • Real-time generation on the canvas — you direct instead of rolling the dice on prompts
  • Image, video and 3D under one roof
  • Many third-party models integrated — one interface, several engines
  • Free tier with 100 compute units/day

Against it

  • Per the sources, the 25% is meant more as a discount on your own subscription than as a payout model — clarify before promoting
  • Compute units hard to budget for
  • No frontier models of its own — Krea is an interface, not a lab

Pricing: Free: 100 compute units/day. Basic $8/mo. (5,000 units/mo., $63 annually). Pro $28/mo. (20,000 units, $252 annually). Max $48/mo. (60,000 units, $756 annually). Business $40/seat/mo. (80,000 units, $1,920 annually, up to 50 seats). Annual plan −40% on the consumer plans. Enterprise on request. Source: krea.ai/pricing.

Sources: krea.ai · krea.ai · krea.ai · x.com

getimg.ai Advertising *

  • Free tier
Details

Pragmatic access to several models incl.

For it

  • 20% on ALL payments for the first 3 months — not just the first one
  • Payout via PayPal and Wise — straightforward for Germany

Against it

  • Unremarkable on substance — no reason to pick it over the frontier models
  • Smaller provider, low brand recognition → expect low conversion
  • Concrete subscription prices not verified from an official source

Pricing: Subscription tiers not verified from an official source — unverified. Check getimg.ai before publishing.

Sources: getimg-ai.getrewardful.com · affiliateotter.com · rewardful.com · rewardful.com

Adobe (Photoshop · Firefly · Creative Cloud)

The dominant force in image editing, now with generative AI (Firefly) built directly into Photoshop — and with the most lucrative single-sale program in the industry.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
Details

For it

  • Huge, purchase-ready demand: "Photoshop" searches for itself
  • Firefly is trained on licensed material — the legal safe harbor for commercial work
  • Free to join, professional network handling via Partnerize

Against it

  • Only 30 days of attribution
  • On prepaid annual subscriptions only 8.33% instead of 85%

Pricing: Prices vary widely by country, product and promotion — deliberately not stated as a number here (unverified for Germany, July 2026).

Sources: adobe.com · adobe.com

fal.ai (fal)

Serverless inference platform built specifically for generative media — image, video, audio, 3D — with its own fast GPUs and billing per output.

  • Paid only
Details

When you're building image/video/audio models into your own tools via API and speed matters. The default building block for media AI in the backend.

For it

  • Media focus: Flux, Veo, Kling, Wan, Seedream, Nano Banana etc. through one API
  • Billing per successful output — no cost for server errors or queue time (official docs)
  • Noticeably faster on video than the generalists; low cold starts
  • Plain GPU rental also possible: H100 from $1.89/h, B200 from $3.49/h (discount prices per the pricing page)

Against it

  • Docs are considered messier than Replicate's
  • Costs run up fast on video (Veo 3: $0.40/second)

Pricing: Pure pay-per-use, no subscription. Examples per fal.ai/pricing: Seedream V4 $0.03/image · Flux Kontext Pro $0.04/image · Nano Banana $0.0398/image · Wan 2.5 $0.05/sec · Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro $0.07/sec · Veo 3 $0.40/sec. GPU rental (discount/list price): H100 $1.89/$3.99 · H200 $2.10/$4.50 · B200 $3.49/$6.25 · B300 $4.49/$8.50 · RTX PRO 6000 $1.10/$2.99 per hour.

Sources: fal.ai · fal.ai · fal.ai

Together AI

Inference and training platform for open models (Llama, DeepSeek, Qwen & co.) — serverless per token or as rented GPU clusters.

  • Free tier
Details

Running or fine-tuning open-weight language models in production when you want neither OpenAI nor Anthropic.

For it

  • Very broad: chat, vision, embeddings, image, video, transcription, fine-tuning, GPU clusters
  • Cheap at volume with open-weight models
  • Dedicated endpoints and real GPU clusters (not just an API)
  • Generous startup program: up to $50,000 in credits via the Startup Accelerator

Against it

  • Focused on text/open-weight — for media AI, fal is the better address
  • The pricing structure is complex (tokens, GPU hours, fine-tuning tokens, storage all separate)

Pricing: Serverless per token: $0.0015–4.50 per million tokens depending on model. Images $0.0006–0.134/image. Video $0.14–3.20/video. Transcription from $0.0015/minute. Dedicated endpoints: H100 $5.49/h, B200 $8.99/h. GPU clusters on-demand $3.99–8.19/GPU/h, reserved $3.09–7.99. Fine-tuning $0.48–8.00 per million tokens (minimum $4/job). Storage $0.16/GiB/month. Free tier available to get started.

Sources: together.ai · together.ai

Hugging Face

The library of the open AI world: over a million models and datasets, plus hosted demos (Spaces) and a router to inference providers.

  • Free tier
  • no sign-up
  • local
Details

Looking up which open model exists and what it can do — and trying demos before paying anyone.

For it

  • The core index of open AI — practically every open model lives here
  • Spaces: demos run in the browser, many of them free (ZeroGPU)
  • Inference Providers: one point of access, many providers (fal, Together, Replicate and others behind it)
  • At $9/month, PRO is very cheap for what you get

Against it

  • Confusing for non-developers; the interface is a workbench, not a product
  • Spaces are often overloaded or broken (community demos)

Pricing: Free account available (Spaces CPU Basic: 2 vCPU / 16 GB, ZeroGPU with dynamic resources). PRO $9/month (10× private storage, 20× inference credits, 8× ZeroGPU allowance). Team $20/user/month. Enterprise $50/user/month. Spaces hardware $0.03/hr (CPU Upgrade) to $23.50/hr (8× L40S). Inference Endpoints from $0.033/hr (CPU) to $74/hr (B200). Storage $8–18/TB/month depending on volume and public/private.

Sources: huggingface.co

Comfy Cloud (comfy.org)

ComfyUI in the cloud — straight from the ComfyUI makers: the node editor runs in the browser on rented GPUs, without a local install.

  • Paid only
  • local
Details

Running ComfyUI workflows without owning a machine with a beefy GPU — and with the original team behind it.

For it

  • From the original team — not a third-party copy; updates land here first
  • You're only billed for active GPU time while the workflow runs, not idle time
  • Extra credits valid for a year (not 90 days like with the consumer aggregators)

Against it

  • No free tier — entry is $20/month
  • Node editor: steep learning curve, nothing for occasional users
  • Minimum payout $100 — with little traffic the first payout takes a while

Pricing: No free tier. Standard $20/month (4,200 credits/month, ~380 videos of 5 sec., 30 min. max runtime per workflow, 1 parallel workflow via API) · Creator $35/month (7,400 credits, ~670 videos, custom LoRAs importable, 3 parallel workflows) · Pro $100/month (21,100 credits, ~1,915 videos, 1 h max runtime, 5 parallel workflows) · Enterprise on request. Extra credits purchasable anytime, valid 1 year.

Sources: comfy.org · comfy.org

RunComfy

Hosted ComfyUI plus a model playground and trainer — a third-party cloud that rents out ComfyUI machines by the hour and offers ready-made model APIs alongside.

  • Paid only
Details

When you want to run ComfyUI by the hour on large GPUs (up to H200) and also need ready-made model endpoints.

For it

  • Three things on one balance: ready-made models, ComfyUI machines and a trainer
  • Broad GPU selection from T4/A4000 up to H200
  • The Pro subscription brings a noticeable discount (20%+) plus $10 monthly credit and 200 GB persistent storage
  • Serverless API for ComfyUI workflows (docs.runcomfy.com) — you can run your own workflows as an endpoint

Against it

  • Purchased credit expires after 365 days
  • The Pro subscription does NOT replace the credit — you still need a balance to use it
  • Since Comfy.org runs its own cloud, the case for third-party providers has gotten narrower

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go without a subscription, shared balance across Models/ComfyUI/Trainer. GPU examples: Medium (T4, A4000) $0.99/h standard or $0.79/h with Pro · 3X-Large (H200) $9.59/h standard or $7.66/h with Pro. Model APIs: image $0.03–0.04/image, video $0.03–0.10/second. Pro subscription $19.99/month (annual $239.90, 33% savings): 20%+ GPU discount, 20 free CPU hours/month, $10 monthly credit, 200 GB persistent storage. Credit expires after 365 days.

Sources: runcomfy.com · docs.runcomfy.com

ThinkDiffusion

Hosted Stable Diffusion interfaces (Automatic1111, ComfyUI) in the browser — spin up a machine, work, shut it down, pay by the hour.

  • Paid only
Details

For it

  • Cleanly handled via Rewardful, monthly payout via Wise
  • Application takes only 24–48 hours, participation is free
  • Low barrier to entry: hourly from under $1, no forced subscription

Against it

  • The focus is still heavily on Stable Diffusion interfaces; the model landscape has moved on
  • Hourly rates add up fast if you leave the machine running
  • Some of the prices below rest on secondary sources — double-check the pricing page yourself

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go, hourly by machine tier. Per third-party sources: FAST from $0.59/h · RAPID $0.99/h · TURBO $1.75/h. Cheaper with a TD Pro subscription (RAPID $0.79/h, TURBO $1.40/h). ⚠️ Figures from secondary sources — check thinkdiffusion.com/pricing yourself, the machine tiers change with the models.

Sources: thinkdiffusion.com · thinkdiffusion.com · aihungry.com

Runware

Price-aggressive inference API for image and video with a very large model catalog — the cheap alternative to fal and Replicate.

  • Paid only
Details

Image generation at volume, when price per image is the deciding criterion.

For it

  • By far the cheapest provider in the category for images (FLUX Schnell from $0.0006/image)
  • Very large model catalog (their own figure: 300,000+ models)
  • Failed requests are not billed

Against it

  • Less well known — recommending it takes more explaining
  • API only, no interface for non-developers
  • Price range very wide ($0.0006–0.24/image) — the cheap numbers apply to the small models

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go. Image generation $0.0006–0.24 per image depending on model, resolution and quality (examples: FLUX Schnell $0.0006, SD 3 $0.0019). Failed requests are free. Details: runware.ai/pricing or runware.ai/docs/platform/pricing.

Sources: runware.ai · runware.ai · techsy.io

Black Forest Labs FLUX.2

The leading open model ecosystem (German team, Freiburg). Small models under Apache 2.0, Pro/Max via API — the choice when you want to own the pipeline.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • EU
  • local
Details

Brand-specific asset libraries at scale: feed in several reference images, get out dozens of consistent variants. And anything that has to run self-hosted (privacy, cost, no filters).

For it

  • Multi-reference consistency — per testing, the open world's answer to character/product fidelity; exactly what a brand client needs for asset libraries

Against it

  • Pricing page only shows a calculator instead of a clear table — costs are hard to work out up front

Pricing: Credit-based, 1 credit = $0.01, API price = playground price. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B from $0.014/image, 9B from $0.015/image (first megapixel flat, each additional one +$0.001). FLUX.2 [pro] from $0.03 (text-to-image) or $0.045 (editing). FLUX.2 [flex] approx. $0.06. FLUX.2 [max] approx. $0.07/image ($70/1k per Artificial Analysis; editing $140/1k). Self-hosting licenses separate. Source: bfl.ai/pricing + docs.bfl.ai.

Sources: bfl.ai · docs.bfl.ai · bfl.ai · openrouter.ai

Stable Diffusion / Civitai (offene Modelle)

The open ecosystem: freely downloadable models plus Civitai as the largest platform for community models, LoRAs, and character training.

  • Free
  • EU
  • local
Details

Full control, zero running costs, no filters. And: training your own LoRAs for a face or a product — the cheapest path to real character consistency.

For it

  • Free self-hosted — after the hardware, there are no per-image costs
  • SD 3.5 is also free for commercial use for companies under $1M annual revenue (Community License)
  • LoRA training: burn a face or product permanently into the model — more consistent than any reference-image trick
  • Huge community, tens of thousands of models and styles on Civitai

Against it

  • ⚠️ LICENSE MINEFIELD: Commercial use depends on the license of EVERY SINGLE community model — many Civitai models have non-commercial clauses. Check before every commissioned job. Warn clearly on the page.
  • Civitai has had no credit card payment since May 2025 (Visa/Mastercard/PayPal pulled out over legal adult content) — Buzz only via crypto. For a reputable brand, a reputation issue; name it honestly.
  • Image quality trails the frontier models unless you put in a lot of work

Pricing: Stable Diffusion 3.5: free for non-commercial use AND free commercially for organizations under $1M annual revenue (Community License); above that an enterprise license is required. Stability API: 1 credit = $0.01; SD 3.5 approx. $0.065/generation, SD 3.5 Large Turbo approx. $0.04. Civitai memberships: Free, Bronze $10/month (10,000 Buzz), Silver $25/month (25,000), Gold $50/month (50,000). Source: stability.ai/license, platform.stability.ai/pricing, Civitai docs.

Sources: stability.ai · platform.stability.ai · stability.ai · civitai.com

FLUX / FLUX.1 Kontext (Black Forest Labs)

German model lab (Freiburg) behind the FLUX image models; Kontext is the image-to-image model that changes specific things in an image while keeping the character consistent.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
  • EU
  • local
Details

For it

  • Kontext is THE tool for character consistency across multiple images — style transfer, background swaps, product retouching
  • Pure usage model: no subscriptions, no seat fees
  • Open weights available in several license tiers

Against it

  • Not an end-user product: unusable without developer skills or a third-party frontend (fal, Replicate, Krea)
  • The pricing page only outputs the figures through a calculator, not as a list
  • Anyone passing the API output straight to end users must credit Magnific/BFL and display the logo

Pricing: Pure pay-as-you-go, explicitly "no subscriptions, no seat fees" (source: bfl.ai/pricing). Concrete rates: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] $0.04/image, Kontext [max] $0.08/image; FLUX.2 Pro roughly $0.03 per generation and $0.045 per edit. These figures are NOT listed on bfl.ai (only a calculator there) — sourced from third parties hosting the same models (fal.ai, pricepertoken.com). Mark as "approx." on the site. Alongside this, license tiers for the open weights (Builder, Platform, Professional, Enterprise).

Sources: bfl.ai · fal.ai · pricepertoken.com

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

Edit photos

Retouch, cut out, upscale, restore.

★ My pick Google Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) — Das erste, was man jemandem in die Hand drückt: läuft in der Gemini-App auf Deutsch, versteht Bearbeitungs-Anweisungen im Gespräch und hält Gesichter, Produkte und Schrift über eine ganze Bildserie durch.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

20 tools

Google Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)

Google's top image model built on Gemini 3 Pro, leading on editing, text rendering, and holding faces and products across image series.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
  • German
Details

Brand commercials with a recurring face or product; conversational image editing; anything with type in the image (multilingual too).

For it

  • Best preservation of identity/character across an image series — per tests, up to 5 subjects consistent, 8–10 consecutive edits stable
  • Leads the image editing arenas; conversational editing leaves the rest of the image alone
  • Text rendering including long passages and non-Latin scripts — decisive for ads with a claim
  • 4K output; the batch API halves the price

Against it

  • Identity drifts after ~8–10 edits; you have to re-anchor to the original reference image regularly
  • Free Gemini usage heavily capped (3 generations/day at low resolution per community reports)
  • Google-typical strict content filters

Pricing: Consumer: Google AI Plus $4.99/mo., AI Pro $19.99/mo., AI Ultra from $99.99/mo. (as of July 2026; Ultra was cut from $249.99 to $99.99 at I/O 2026) — Nano Banana Pro is included in Pro and Ultra. API: approx. $0.134/image (1K–2K) and approx. $0.24/image (4K); Artificial Analysis lists $134/1000 images — consistent. Batch API: 50% discount. Source: gemini.google/subscriptions + OpenRouter/pricepertoken.

Sources: gemini.google · openrouter.ai · pricepertoken.com · support.google.com

Magnific (ehemals Freepik) Advertising *

The former Freepik platform: stock library plus a complete AI suite (image, video, audio, upscaling, editor) — united under the name Magnific since 04/28/2026.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
  • EU
Details

The all-rounder for people who need stock, image generation and upscaling in one subscription — agency and marketing day-to-day.

For it

  • ⚠️ IMPORTANT: Freepik has been called Magnific since 04/28/2026 — freepik.com redirects to magnific.com. Anyone still linking "Freepik" is linking a dead brand name
  • Combines stock assets (250M+), AI generation, the Magnific upscaler and a collaborative workspace
  • Over 1M paying subscribers, $230M ARR, bootstrapped and profitable — no startup failure risk
  • On Premium+/Pro around 10 image models generate without consuming credits

Against it

  • Credit system across the whole suite: video/audio always consume credits, even on the most expensive plan
  • The rebrand is fresh — docs, links and third-party sources are still inconsistent in places

Pricing: Free tier available (limited daily access, per the docs ~20 generations/day, 10 downloads/day, personal use only with attribution). Paid tiers per official docs (AI credits): Premium 20,000/month or 240,000/year · Premium+ 45,000/month or 600,000/year · Pro 300,000/month or 4M/year · Business 45,000 per seat/month · Enterprise custom. Prices per third-party sources approx. $14.50 (Premium), $33.75 (Premium+), $210 (Pro) monthly when paid annually — not officially retrievable, check yourself.

Sources: magnific.com · magnific.com · thenextweb.com · tech.eu

Adobe Firefly (Video)

Adobe's video generation — not the best image quality, but the only one with real IP indemnification. For brand commercials, it's the rights argument.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
Details

For it

  • The ONLY model with real IP indemnification: Adobe defends paying customers against copyright lawsuits over generated content
  • Trained on licensed and public domain material — no stolen training set
  • Does NOT train on customer data
  • Embedded directly in the Creative Cloud workflow (Premiere, After Effects)

Against it

  • Quality clearly below Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0 — you're buying legal certainty, not image quality
  • The indemnification has holes: it does NOT apply if the prompt names a third-party brand or a named artist, or if you upload a reference image you don't have rights to
  • Cookie only 30 days

Pricing: Firefly Standard $9.99/month (2,000 generative credits) · Firefly Pro $29.99/month (7,000 credits). IP indemnification for paid Firefly and Creative Cloud plans. Source: https://fluxnote.io/guides/adobe-firefly-ai-video-generator-review · https://business.adobe.com/products/firefly-business/firefly-ai-approach.html (official, on indemnification)

Sources: adobe.com · business.adobe.com · licenseorg.com · fluxnote.io

OpenAI GPT Image 2

OpenAI's current image model, in ChatGPT and via the API; per blind arena results, long the number one for prompt adherence.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
Details

Images that need to show exactly what the prompt says — complex scenes, many elements, text in the image. The most reliable "I describe it, you deliver it" generator.

For it

  • Best prompt adherence in the field — debuted with the largest lead in the history of the Artificial Analysis image arena (Elo 1,339 from 13,405 blind comparisons)
  • Very strong text rendering
  • Usable via ChatGPT with no technical hurdle — the lowest barrier to entry there is
  • The low quality tier is extremely cheap (roughly $0.005/image) — good for mass iteration

Against it

  • Reference images are always processed at high fidelity → edit workflows quickly cost 2–3x
  • The high quality tier is expensive at up to ~$0.21/image
  • Aesthetically often "safe"; for art direction many people still reach for Midjourney

Pricing: API is token-based: $5/M text input, $8/M image input, $10/M text output, $30/M image output. Per image in practice roughly $0.005 (low), roughly $0.04–0.05 (medium), roughly $0.165–0.211 (high). Batch API −50%. Consumer access via ChatGPT subscription. Source: OpenAI docs + pricing calculators (costgoat, WaveSpeed).

Sources: platform.openai.com · costgoat.com · wavespeed.ai · llm-stats.com

Ideogram

The typography specialist: the model that first genuinely mastered text in images — logos, posters, packaging, anything with text.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

Anything with letters: posters, ad creatives with a claim, logo drafts, packaging mockups.

For it

  • Historically the best text rendering; still strong today on logo and poster layouts
  • Very cheap entry (Basic from approx. $7–8/month)
  • Free tier available (10 slow credits/week)
  • Good balance of design understanding and image quality

Against it

  • The lead on text is gone — Nano Banana Pro, GPT Image 2 and Riverflow now render type just as well or better. Ideogram needs to reposition.
  • Pricing figures differ by source (Basic $7 vs. $8, Plus $15 vs. $20, Pro $42 vs. $60) — Ideogram changes its plans frequently
  • Free tier with 10 credits/week is practically useless

Pricing: INCONSISTENT across sources — Ideogram changes its plans often. Cited figures: Free (10 slow credits/week, resets Saturdays 00:00 UTC), Basic approx. $7–8/month, Plus approx. $15–20/month, Team approx. $20/user/month, Pro approx. $42–60/month (incl. API). Annual plan saves 25–30%. Ideogram itself explicitly warns in its docs against trusting static pricing tables — only ideogram.ai/pricing is binding. For the site: link to the live pricing page, don't write a hard figure.

Sources: ideogram.ai · docs.ideogram.ai · openaffiliate.dev · ideogram.ai

Recraft

The designer's generator: the only one seriously producing real VECTORS (SVG) instead of pixels — plus consistent brand styles.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

Logos, icons, illustrations, and anything that has to scale infinitely. The only generator whose output lives on directly in Illustrator.

For it

  • Real vector output (SVG) — unmatched in this list
  • Trainable custom styles → consistent visual language across an entire brand world
  • Very strong at icon sets and illustration systems
  • Cheap entry point (Basic $10/month)

Against it

  • ⚠️ THE FREE PLAN IS A TRAP: images from the free plan BELONG TO RECRAFT, are publicly visible in the community gallery, and may NOT be used commercially. Highlight this in bold on the page.
  • Photorealism weaker than the frontier models — Recraft is a design tool, not a photo tool
  • Credit system burns through fast

Pricing: Free: 50 credits/day — BUT WITHOUT commercial rights, images belong to Recraft. Basic $10/month (1,000 credits, annually $120/year) incl. commercial rights + private generation. Advanced $27/month (4,000 credits). Pro $48/month (8,400 credits, incl. video, priority). Extra credits $2 per 200. Annual billing up to −20%. Teams/Enterprise on request. Source: recraft.ai/pricing + recraft.ai/docs/plans-and-billing/paid-plans.

Sources: recraft.ai · recraft.ai · recraft.ai · recraft.ai

Leonardo.ai

Once one of the most popular all-round tools with a strong free tier, increasingly absorbed into Canva since the Canva acquisition.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Beginners with a Canva subscription; game assets and concept art.

For it

  • Generous free tier with daily free credits
  • Train your own models (Elements, Custom Models) — good for consistent styles
  • Full access to the Leonardo Essential plan is included in Canva Business/Enterprise — free for Canva users
  • Good community, many presets, low barrier to entry

Against it

  • Quality-wise left behind by the frontier models
  • Unclear product future after the Canva acquisition — much is migrating into Canva
  • Confusing credit mechanics

Pricing: Free tier with daily credits; paid tiers above it. Leonardo Essential is included in Canva Business/Enterprise. I could not verify concrete current subscription prices from an official source — unverified, check leonardo.ai/pricing before publishing.

Sources: intercom.help · leonardo.ai · canva.com · canva.com

Reve

Layout-oriented image model with native 4K output — thinks in composition and text blocks rather than just subjects.

  • Free tier
Details

Graphics-heavy work: posters, ad layouts, anything with a lot of text and defined image architecture. Native 4K without upscaling.

For it

  • Native 4K output — saves the upscaling step
  • Layout-first: understands image structure, not just subjects
  • Very cheap: Pro at $19.99/mo undercuts nearly the whole field
  • Transparent API pricing (Create approx. $0.024/image)

Against it

  • Small provider, low profile — thin community, little learning material
  • The "energy" system as a billing unit is less transparent than plain credits
  • No top spot in the major blind arenas

Pricing: Free (starting allowance + daily refresh), Lite $7.99/mo (approx. 5× the Free energy), Pro $19.99/mo (approx. 100× the Free energy + a monthly video allowance). API separate via the Reve console: minimum purchase $10 = 7,500 credits; Create 18 credits (approx. $0.024), Edit 30 credits (approx. $0.04), Remix 30 credits (approx. $0.04). Source: app.reve.com/pricing + help.reve.com.

Sources: app.reve.com · help.reve.com · eesel.ai · eesel.ai

ImagineArt

  • Free tier
Details

Substantively, a solid all-round point of access to several models for price-sensitive beginners.

For it

  • Explicitly open to small channels and new sites too — low barrier to entry
  • Handled via Impact (professional tracking, reliable payouts)
  • Wide price range ($6.99 to over $100/month) → high order values possible too

Against it

  • Not a leader on substance — anyone who wants the best goes straight to Nano Banana Pro, GPT Image 2 or Midjourney. That has to be stated honestly on the site.
  • Cookie duration stated inconsistently (30 vs. 60 days) — clarify before publishing
  • No models of its own

Pricing: Plans per the provider from $6.99/month to over $100/month. I was unable to verify the exact tiers from a reliable source — unsubstantiated, check on imagine.art before publishing.

Sources: imagine.art · imagine.art · app.impact.com · flexoffers.com

Photoroom

Photo editing for product shots and e-commerce: background removal, AI backgrounds, shadows, retouching — as an app and as an API.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
  • EU
Details

For it

  • Clean program via Awin — professional tracking, clear terms
  • Generous free tier: 250 exports/month
  • Startup program with 60,000 free images for qualifying companies

Against it

  • Double approval needed (Awin account AND Photoroom)
  • Only a 30-day cookie

Pricing: Free 250 exports/month (background remover, retouching, templates). Paid: Pro, Max, Ultra, Enterprise — the official pricing page loads the amounts via script and does not serve them statically; circulating figures (Pro ~$7.99, Max ~$26.99, Ultra from ~$99/month) are UNVERIFIED here and should be checked by hand before publication. API confirmed: Basic $0.02/image from $20/month, Plus $0.10/image from $100/month, Partner $0.01/image from $1,000/month. (Source: photoroom.com/api/pricing)

Sources: photoroom.com · ui.awin.com · photoroom.com · photoroom.com

Remini

Mass-market photo restoration via app: cleaning up old, blurry, or pixelated images and faces — known from the App Store charts.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • EU
Details

For it

  • About as low a barrier to entry as it gets: open the app, drop the image in, done
  • Very strong specifically on faces and old family photos
  • Free tier with daily credits available
  • Huge name recognition — people actively search for it

Against it

  • Billed WEEKLY, which adds up over a year
  • Free tier with watermark and ad interruptions
  • Tends to overcook: faces often look smoothed out and "AI-ish" — usually too crude for professional work (that's what Topaz is for)

Pricing: Free tier with daily credits, watermark, and ads. Paid: Personal approx. $6.99/WEEK, Business approx. $9.99/week (with bulk upload and commercial use). These amounts come from third-party sources and are not verifiable on an official pricing page (Remini bills through the app stores) — mark as UNVERIFIED on the page or leave out entirely.

Sources: remini.ai · en.wikipedia.org

Sourceful Riverflow 2.0 / 2.5

Agentic image and editing model that corrects itself — multiple iterations per job until the result lands.

  • Paid only
Details

Advertising and product images where reliability matters more than 20 attempts — plus anything requiring exact typography (font control).

For it

  • Agentic self-correction across multiple iterations → high first-try hit rate
  • Font control: real typeface control instead of guessed letters
  • 1K/2K/4K, 10+ aspect ratios, transparent backgrounds

Against it

  • Most expensive model in the comparison: $150/1000 images
  • Small vendor, little community, barely any tutorials — you have to work out the knowledge yourself
  • Prices/plans not openly listed, enterprise-heavy ("Talk to sales")

Pricing: $150/1000 images (= $0.15/image) according to Artificial Analysis — a premium position above GPT Image 1.5 ($133/1k), Nano Banana Pro ($134/1k), and FLUX.2 [max] ($70/1k generation). Access via riverflow.ai as well as API through Runware, Replicate, and OpenRouter. No subscription plans of its own are listed on the website — unverified.

Sources: riverflow.ai · riverflow.ai · x.com · artificialanalysis.ai

ByteDance Seedream 5.0

ByteDance's (TikTok) image model family — Pro since 2026-07-08, Lite since February 2026. Price-performance winner for high-quality images at volume.

  • Paid only
Details

A lot of output for little money — ad creatives in variants, infographics, multi-reference fusion (Lite handles up to 14 reference images).

For it

  • Very cheap for the quality: Lite $0.035/image, Pro $0.075/image
  • Lite takes up to 14 reference images — strong for product/character consistency at a bargain price
  • Pro targets dense infographics, precise editing and photographic realism
  • Reasoning-based — understands complex image briefs

Against it

  • ByteDance/China: a real compliance issue with brand and public-sector clients in Germany — data outflow, censorship questions. Name it honestly.
  • Documentation and usage rights thin in English; commercial terms less clear than with Western providers
  • Content filters of Chinese character (politically sensitive subjects)

Pricing: Seedream 5.0 Pro (released 2026-07-08): $0.075/image up to 2.36 MP; on WaveSpeed from $0.045/run, scales with parameters. Seedream 5.0 Lite: $0.035/image, up to 14 reference images. Source: seed.bytedance.com + WaveSpeed/OpenRouter/Vercel price lists.

Sources: seed.bytedance.com · seed.bytedance.com · wavespeed.ai · openrouter.ai

Krea AI

Creative suite for image, video and 3D with a real-time canvas — you paint roughly, the AI renders along live. The most tactile tool in the field.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

Iterative, hands-on creative work instead of prompt lottery: real-time canvas, style transfer, enhancement. Ideal for film people to find a look fast.

For it

  • Real-time generation on the canvas — you direct instead of rolling the dice on prompts
  • Image, video and 3D under one roof
  • Many third-party models integrated — one interface, several engines
  • Free tier with 100 compute units/day

Against it

  • Per the sources, the 25% is meant more as a discount on your own subscription than as a payout model — clarify before promoting
  • Compute units hard to budget for
  • No frontier models of its own — Krea is an interface, not a lab

Pricing: Free: 100 compute units/day. Basic $8/mo. (5,000 units/mo., $63 annually). Pro $28/mo. (20,000 units, $252 annually). Max $48/mo. (60,000 units, $756 annually). Business $40/seat/mo. (80,000 units, $1,920 annually, up to 50 seats). Annual plan −40% on the consumer plans. Enterprise on request. Source: krea.ai/pricing.

Sources: krea.ai · krea.ai · krea.ai · x.com

getimg.ai Advertising *

  • Free tier
Details

Pragmatic access to several models incl.

For it

  • 20% on ALL payments for the first 3 months — not just the first one
  • Payout via PayPal and Wise — straightforward for Germany

Against it

  • Unremarkable on substance — no reason to pick it over the frontier models
  • Smaller provider, low brand recognition → expect low conversion
  • Concrete subscription prices not verified from an official source

Pricing: Subscription tiers not verified from an official source — unverified. Check getimg.ai before publishing.

Sources: getimg-ai.getrewardful.com · affiliateotter.com · rewardful.com · rewardful.com

Topaz Labs (Gigapixel · Photo · Video · Bloom · Astra)

The reference for upscaling and cleaning up image and video — subscription-only since 2026, with Bloom and Astra as two models built specifically for AI-generated material.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
  • local
Details

For it

  • Bloom (image) and Astra (video) are built explicitly for AI output: they bring generated clips up to real 4K quality — the last mile the video generators don't deliver themselves
  • Astra detects cuts automatically and applies its own settings per scene instead of steamrolling everything globally
  • The quality is the industry standard — Krea licenses Topaz models for its own upscaler
  • Broad range: desktop apps, cloud web apps and ComfyUI integration

Against it

  • Perpetual licenses were discontinued in September 2025 — it's subscriptions only now, existing owners keep their version
  • Expensive: the full Studio bundle costs $399/year, Studio Pro $799/year
  • No free tier on the pricing page
  • The product range (Photo, Video, Gigapixel, Astra, Bloom, Image Web, Mosaic) has become hard to keep track of

Pricing: Subscription only, no free tier. Desktop: Gigapixel $29/mo or $149/year · Photo $39/mo or $199/year · Video $59/mo or $299/year. Cloud: Astra (video upscale) from $19/mo · Bloom (creative image upscale) $39/mo or $229/year · Image Web from $12/mo. Bundle: Studio $69/mo or $399/year, Studio Pro $799/year. (Source: topazlabs.com/pricing)

Sources: topazlabs.com · topazlabs.com · topazlabs.com · topazlabs.com

Adobe (Photoshop · Firefly · Creative Cloud)

The dominant force in image editing, now with generative AI (Firefly) built directly into Photoshop — and with the most lucrative single-sale program in the industry.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
Details

For it

  • Huge, purchase-ready demand: "Photoshop" searches for itself
  • Firefly is trained on licensed material — the legal safe harbor for commercial work
  • Free to join, professional network handling via Partnerize

Against it

  • Only 30 days of attribution
  • On prepaid annual subscriptions only 8.33% instead of 85%

Pricing: Prices vary widely by country, product and promotion — deliberately not stated as a number here (unverified for Germany, July 2026).

Sources: adobe.com · adobe.com

Black Forest Labs FLUX.2

The leading open model ecosystem (German team, Freiburg). Small models under Apache 2.0, Pro/Max via API — the choice when you want to own the pipeline.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • EU
  • local
Details

Brand-specific asset libraries at scale: feed in several reference images, get out dozens of consistent variants. And anything that has to run self-hosted (privacy, cost, no filters).

For it

  • Multi-reference consistency — per testing, the open world's answer to character/product fidelity; exactly what a brand client needs for asset libraries

Against it

  • Pricing page only shows a calculator instead of a clear table — costs are hard to work out up front

Pricing: Credit-based, 1 credit = $0.01, API price = playground price. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B from $0.014/image, 9B from $0.015/image (first megapixel flat, each additional one +$0.001). FLUX.2 [pro] from $0.03 (text-to-image) or $0.045 (editing). FLUX.2 [flex] approx. $0.06. FLUX.2 [max] approx. $0.07/image ($70/1k per Artificial Analysis; editing $140/1k). Self-hosting licenses separate. Source: bfl.ai/pricing + docs.bfl.ai.

Sources: bfl.ai · docs.bfl.ai · bfl.ai · openrouter.ai

Stable Diffusion / Civitai (offene Modelle)

The open ecosystem: freely downloadable models plus Civitai as the largest platform for community models, LoRAs, and character training.

  • Free
  • EU
  • local
Details

Full control, zero running costs, no filters. And: training your own LoRAs for a face or a product — the cheapest path to real character consistency.

For it

  • Free self-hosted — after the hardware, there are no per-image costs
  • SD 3.5 is also free for commercial use for companies under $1M annual revenue (Community License)
  • LoRA training: burn a face or product permanently into the model — more consistent than any reference-image trick
  • Huge community, tens of thousands of models and styles on Civitai

Against it

  • ⚠️ LICENSE MINEFIELD: Commercial use depends on the license of EVERY SINGLE community model — many Civitai models have non-commercial clauses. Check before every commissioned job. Warn clearly on the page.
  • Civitai has had no credit card payment since May 2025 (Visa/Mastercard/PayPal pulled out over legal adult content) — Buzz only via crypto. For a reputable brand, a reputation issue; name it honestly.
  • Image quality trails the frontier models unless you put in a lot of work

Pricing: Stable Diffusion 3.5: free for non-commercial use AND free commercially for organizations under $1M annual revenue (Community License); above that an enterprise license is required. Stability API: 1 credit = $0.01; SD 3.5 approx. $0.065/generation, SD 3.5 Large Turbo approx. $0.04. Civitai memberships: Free, Bronze $10/month (10,000 Buzz), Silver $25/month (25,000), Gold $50/month (50,000). Source: stability.ai/license, platform.stability.ai/pricing, Civitai docs.

Sources: stability.ai · platform.stability.ai · stability.ai · civitai.com

FLUX / FLUX.1 Kontext (Black Forest Labs)

German model lab (Freiburg) behind the FLUX image models; Kontext is the image-to-image model that changes specific things in an image while keeping the character consistent.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
  • EU
  • local
Details

For it

  • Kontext is THE tool for character consistency across multiple images — style transfer, background swaps, product retouching
  • Pure usage model: no subscriptions, no seat fees
  • Open weights available in several license tiers

Against it

  • Not an end-user product: unusable without developer skills or a third-party frontend (fal, Replicate, Krea)
  • The pricing page only outputs the figures through a calculator, not as a list
  • Anyone passing the API output straight to end users must credit Magnific/BFL and display the logo

Pricing: Pure pay-as-you-go, explicitly "no subscriptions, no seat fees" (source: bfl.ai/pricing). Concrete rates: FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] $0.04/image, Kontext [max] $0.08/image; FLUX.2 Pro roughly $0.03 per generation and $0.045 per edit. These figures are NOT listed on bfl.ai (only a calculator there) — sourced from third parties hosting the same models (fal.ai, pricepertoken.com). Mark as "approx." on the site. Alongside this, license tiers for the open weights (Builder, Platform, Professional, Enterprise).

Sources: bfl.ai · fal.ai · pricepertoken.com

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

Create video

From text or a photo to moving image.

★ My pick Google Veo 3.1 (via Flow / Gemini API) — Beste Prompt-Treue im Feld, der Ton kommt direkt mit — und über Flow oder die Gemini-App legt man ohne jedes Vorwissen sofort los.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

29 tools

Google Veo 3.1 (via Flow / Gemini API)

Google's video model with native audio, currently regarded as the strongest all-rounder for narrative scenes and establishing shots; usable via the Flow interface or the Gemini API.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
Details

Hero shots and establishing shots in brand commercials, when the audio should come along with it and prompt adherence has to hold up.

For it

  • Best prompt adherence in the field — it does what you write
  • Native, synchronized audio (dialogue, ambience, effects) straight out of the model, no separate pass
  • 4K output in landscape and portrait
  • Three quality tiers (Lite/Fast/Quality) — you can iterate cheap and finalize expensive

Against it

  • Credits system: the 1,000 Flow credits in the Pro plan only cover ~10 videos at top quality
  • Full Veo 3.1 usage is effectively tied to the expensive Ultra tiers
  • Tied to a Google account, feature availability varies by region

Pricing: Subscription (as of 07/2026, official site): Free $0 · Google AI Plus $4.99/month (200 Flow credits) · Google AI Pro $19.99/month (1,000 credits) · Google AI Ultra from $99.99/month (10,000 credits) or $199.99/month (25,000 credits). Source: https://gemini.google/subscriptions/ — API (official price list, audio always included): Veo 3.1 Standard $0.40/sec (720p/1080p), $0.60/sec (4K) · Veo 3.1 Fast $0.10/sec (720p), $0.12/sec (1080p), $0.30/sec (4K) · Veo 3.1 Lite $0.05/sec (720p), $0.08/sec (1080p). Source: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing

Sources: gemini.google · ai.google.dev · aiviewer.ai

Replicate

Marketplace and hosting for thousands of public AI models you can run via API with one line of code — plus deploy your own models.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

Trying out a new model fast before you take it into production somewhere else. The catalog is the strength.

For it

  • Largest open model catalog in the category; the community pushes new models in very fast
  • Best documentation of the developer platforms
  • Your own models/fine-tunes can be hosted as a private deployment
  • Startup program with $1,000–10,000 in credits (non-dilutive, no VC needed)

Against it

  • Usually more expensive than fal for the same models
  • Private models also cost setup and idle time, not just compute time
  • No free tier on the pricing page

Pricing: Pay-per-use, two modes: (a) by time — CPU (Small) $0.000025/sec ($0.09/h) · Nvidia T4 $0.000225/sec ($0.81/h) · A100 80 GB $0.001400/sec ($5.04/h) · H100 $0.001525/sec ($5.49/h); (b) by input/output — e.g. Claude 3.7 Sonnet $3.00 per million input tokens. Private models: the entire instance runtime is billed.

Sources: replicate.com · replicate.com · ycombinator.com

Higgsfield AI

Video-first aggregator: bundles 15+ video and image models (Sora, Veo, Kling, Wan, Seedance, Hailuo …) under one subscription, with camera movements and effect presets as its differentiator.

  • Free tier
  • watermark
Details

AI video production without code, when you want to compare several models and control camera moves.

For it

  • One subscription for the major video models instead of five separate ones
  • Camera presets and motion controls — exactly the language film people speak
  • Plus "Higgsfield Earn": pays creators directly for high-performing AI videos on Instagram (up to $1,000 on day one, max. $2,500 lifetime per video, per the official site)

Against it

  • Per third-party sources, credits expire 90 days after purchase and don't roll into the following month — an expensive trap
  • Per third-party sources, monthly billing costs 50–60% more than annual
  • The pricing page serves no machine-readable figures — everything below is sourced from third parties

Pricing: ⚠️ Not officially verifiable — higgsfield.ai/pricing serves no pricing table when fetched. Per third-party sources (annual billing): Starter $15/month (200 credits), Plus $39/month (1,000 credits), Ultra $99/month (3,000 credits, scalable up to 9,000), plus team plans. Credit packs approx. $5 per 100 credits, valid for 90 days. Check for yourself before recommending.

Sources: higgsfield.ai · higgsfield.ai · higgsfield.ai · startuphub.ai

Pollo AI

Consumer aggregator for AI video: bundles Kling, Runway, Hailuo, Vidu, Hunyuan, and its own models in one interface, plus an API platform.

  • Free tier
Details

For it

  • One subscription for the major video models, without paying each provider separately
  • Also usable as an API platform (pollo.ai/api-platform)
  • Free credits on sign-up

Against it

  • Cookie duration not findable
  • Minimum payout $100, billing only between the 10th and 15th of the following month
  • Brand is less established than Higgsfield or Krea — a trust question when recommending it

Pricing: Subscription model with credits, tiers at pollo.ai/pricing (free credits on sign-up). Concrete amounts not machine-retrievable — check yourself before recommending. No figures here because unverified.

Sources: pollo.ai · polloai.tapfiliate.com · pollo.ai · pollo.ai

Kling 3.0 (Kuaishou)

Chinese frontier model that matches Veo on cinematic lighting and complex motion (hair, fluids, fabric) — with multi-shot storyboard and beat-synced cuts.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

Motion-heavy brand shots — flowing fabric, water, hair — and multi-shot sequences when cost per second matters.

For it

  • Physically convincing motion — hair, fabric, fluids are its signature discipline
  • Cinematic lighting on par with Veo 3.1
  • Multi-shot storyboard mode with audio sync across the cuts
  • Generous free tier: 66 credits daily, no credit card

Against it

  • Broad license-back to Kuaishou: you grant a worldwide, sublicensable use of your own material — a real issue on sensitive brand projects
  • Attribution requirement: without written special permission you must credit "Kling AI" when sharing
  • Free tier: 720p only, watermark, NO commercial use

Pricing: WARNING: The official membership page blocks external requests (HTTP 446), the following figures come from secondary sources. Free: 66 credits/day, expire after 24h, 720p only, watermark, non-commercial. Standard: list price ~$10/mo, introductory offer ~$6.99/mo (~660 credits). Higher tiers up to Ultra (~26,000 credits/mo). API/usage Kling 3.0: ~$0.084/sec (Standard, without video input) to ~$0.168/sec (Pro mode with video input). Sources: https://www.eesel.ai/blog/kling-ai-pricing · https://kling.ai/app/membership/membership-plan (official, but blocked)

Sources: app.klingai.com · app.klingai.com · eesel.ai · kling.ai

Luma Dream Machine (Ray3)

Video model with one differentiator that matters in post: a real HDR pipeline with EXR output.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

Shots that go into a real grade afterwards — when AI material has to fit into a professional post workflow instead of ending as a finished MP4.

For it

  • HDR pipeline with EXR export — the only major model that plugs into a real grading/VFX workflow
  • Ray 3.14 (Jan 2026) is 4× faster and 3× cheaper at 720p than base Ray 3
  • Commercial use explicitly included in the Plus plan
  • Relaxed mode on higher plans for generating without consuming credits

Against it

  • Expensive: entry into the officially listed individual plan is $30/mo
  • HDR eats credits: 720p HDR costs 1,280 credits for 5 seconds — the Plus plan (10,000) covers ~39 seconds
  • Ray 3.14 does NOT support HDR/EXR of all things — for grading you have to fall back to the slower, more expensive base Ray 3

Pricing: Official pricing page (as of 07/2026): Plus $30/mo (or $25/mo at $300 annually) with 10,000 credits, commercial use included · Pro $90/mo (or $75/mo annually) with 40,000 credits · Ultra $300/mo (or $250/mo annually) with 150,000 credits · Team/Enterprise on request. Source: https://lumalabs.ai/pricing — credit costs Ray3 HDR: 540p HDR 640 credits/5 sec, 720p HDR 1,280 credits/5 sec, HDR with EXR 1,120 credits/5 sec at 540p. Source: https://lumalabs.ai/learning-hub/dream-machine-support-pricing-information (Note: third-party sources also mention a Lite plan from $9.99 — not listed on the official page, therefore unverified.)

Sources: lumalabs.ai · lumalabs.ai · lumalabs.ai · openaffiliate.dev

Higgsfield

Aggregator platform focused on cinematic camera movement and VFX for social content — bundles third-party top models (Kling, Veo, Nano Banana Pro) under one interface.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

For it

  • Camera movement presets that otherwise have to be laboriously prompted
  • One subscription, many models — Kling 3.0, Veo, Nano Banana Pro under one roof
  • Plus "Higgsfield Earn": pays creators directly for posting AI videos (up to $2,500 lifetime per video)

Against it

  • It's a layer on top, not a frontier model of its own — you pay a markup on other people's models
  • Credits expire monthly, no rollover
  • Very social-/short-form-heavy — less deep than Runway for long brand commercials

Pricing: WARNING: the official pricing page serves no content to automated clients; figures from secondary sources (as of 2026, after the rename from Basic/Pro/Ultimate to Starter/Plus/Ultra): Starter ~$15/month (annual) with 200 credits/month · Plus ~$39/month (annual) with 1,000 credits, all models, parallel generations · Ultra ~$99/month (annual) with 3,000 credits · additional credit packs ~$5/100 credits. Credits expire monthly. Sources: https://www.scopeful.org/tools/higgsfield · https://flowith.io/blog/higgsfield-pricing-2026-free-vs-creator-vs-studio/ · https://higgsfield.ai/pricing (official)

Sources: higgsfield.ai · x.com · adskull.io · startuphub.ai

PixVerse

  • Free tier
  • watermark
Details

For it

  • No minimum follower threshold, no fees, approval usually within 24 h
  • Cheap entry point, actively developed

Against it

  • Clearly below Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0, and Seedance 2.0 in quality — not a tool for a high-end brand commercial
  • The incentive to recommend it is financial, not qualitative. Separating that honestly is the actual challenge
  • Exact pricing tiers inconsistent across sources, official figures not cleanly verifiable

Pricing: unverified — the official pricing tiers could not be cleanly verified in this research. A free tier exists. Check https://pixverse.ai/ yourself before publishing and back the numbers up with a date.

Sources: pixverse.ai · pixverse.ai

Freepik (AI Video Suite)

Aggregator that bundles the top models (Veo 3, Kling, Runway Gen-4

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
  • EU
Details

For it

  • You don't need five subscriptions to compare the models
  • Routing engine sends a shot to whichever model fits it

Against it

  • Markup over using the models directly; power users are better off with a direct subscription
  • Less granular control than the original interfaces (Runway/Flow)
  • Cookie duration also stated inconsistently (30 vs. 60 days)

Pricing: unverified — the current subscription tiers for the Freepik AI suite could not be cleanly verified in this research. Check https://www.freepik.com/pricing before publishing and cite with a date. Only the feature scope is verified: the subscription includes Google Veo 3, Kling, Runway Gen-4.5, MiniMax Hailuo, PixVerse, Wan and LTX-2 Pro, among others. Source: https://freepik.app/en

Sources: freepik.app · affiliateprogramdb.com · openaffiliate.dev · affiliateotter.com

Adobe Firefly (Video)

Adobe's video generation — not the best image quality, but the only one with real IP indemnification. For brand commercials, it's the rights argument.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
Details

For it

  • The ONLY model with real IP indemnification: Adobe defends paying customers against copyright lawsuits over generated content
  • Trained on licensed and public domain material — no stolen training set
  • Does NOT train on customer data
  • Embedded directly in the Creative Cloud workflow (Premiere, After Effects)

Against it

  • Quality clearly below Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0 — you're buying legal certainty, not image quality
  • The indemnification has holes: it does NOT apply if the prompt names a third-party brand or a named artist, or if you upload a reference image you don't have rights to
  • Cookie only 30 days

Pricing: Firefly Standard $9.99/month (2,000 generative credits) · Firefly Pro $29.99/month (7,000 credits). IP indemnification for paid Firefly and Creative Cloud plans. Source: https://fluxnote.io/guides/adobe-firefly-ai-video-generator-review · https://business.adobe.com/products/firefly-business/firefly-ai-approach.html (official, on indemnification)

Sources: adobe.com · business.adobe.com · licenseorg.com · fluxnote.io

MiniMax Hailuo 2.3

The price-performance winner among the Chinese models — solid motion and 1080p at prices where iterating doesn't hurt.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

High volume and fast iteration — when you need 30 variants of a shot before one lands.

For it

  • Best price-performance ratio in the field — API from ~$0.19 per video
  • Hailuo 2.3 Fast cuts the cost of mass production by up to 50%
  • Solid motion rendering in complex scenes
  • 1080p available

Against it

  • Credit system punishes experimentation: failed generations still burn credits
  • Unused credits expire monthly
  • Not at the quality level of Veo 3.1 or Kling 3.0

Pricing: Subscription: $9.99 to $199.99/mo; Pro tier for creators at ~$34.99–54.99/mo. Credit consumption (official API docs): MiniMax-Hailuo-2.3 — 768p/6 sec = 1 video point, 768p/10 sec = 2 points, 1080p/6 sec = 2 points. API from ~$0.19 per video. Sources: https://platform.minimax.io/docs/guides/pricing-video · https://magichour.ai/blog/hailuo-23-pricing

Sources: platform.minimax.io · minimax.io · magichour.ai · hailuoai.video

Pika

The specialist for playful effects — Pikaffects (melt, explode, crush), Pikaswaps, lip-sync. Social content, not cinema.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

Social spots with an effect gag — when a product needs to melt, explode, or transform.

For it

  • Pikaffects: physics-breaking effects other models don't offer — melt, explode, crush
  • Pikaswaps and Pikadditions for targeted object manipulation
  • Commercial use from the cheapest paid plan up ($8/month annually)
  • Free tier with 80 credits/month

Against it

  • Not in the running quality-wise for a cinematic look
  • Effect-driven rather than narrative — rarely the right tool for brand commercials
  • All Pikaffects only from the Pro plan up ($28/month annually)

Pricing: Free: 80 credits/month · Standard $8/month annually or $10 monthly (700 credits, commercial use) · Pro $28/month annually or $35 monthly (2,300 credits, all Pikaffects) · Fancy $76/month annually or $95 monthly (6,000 credits). Sources: https://pika.art/pricing · https://www.eesel.ai/blog/pika-ai-pricing

Sources: pika.art · eesel.ai · magichour.ai

ImagineArt

  • Free tier
Details

Substantively, a solid all-round point of access to several models for price-sensitive beginners.

For it

  • Explicitly open to small channels and new sites too — low barrier to entry
  • Handled via Impact (professional tracking, reliable payouts)
  • Wide price range ($6.99 to over $100/month) → high order values possible too

Against it

  • Not a leader on substance — anyone who wants the best goes straight to Nano Banana Pro, GPT Image 2 or Midjourney. That has to be stated honestly on the site.
  • Cookie duration stated inconsistently (30 vs. 60 days) — clarify before publishing
  • No models of its own

Pricing: Plans per the provider from $6.99/month to over $100/month. I was unable to verify the exact tiers from a reliable source — unsubstantiated, check on imagine.art before publishing.

Sources: imagine.art · imagine.art · app.impact.com · flexoffers.com

Luma AI

Video and image generation (Ray models, formerly "Dream Machine") plus 3D capture/NeRF — now positioned as an agentic creative platform.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

For it

  • Bundles its own and third-party models (Kling, Veo, Seedance, Seedream, ElevenLabs) under one interface — one subscription, many models
  • Includes utilities like background removal, upscaling, reframing
  • The 3D capture roots (NeRF) are still relevant for film people
  • Annual payment saves around 20%

Against it

  • NO free tier on the pricing page anymore — entry starts at $30/month
  • Expensive at the top end: Ultra costs $300/month

Pricing: No free tier listed. Plus $30/mo or $25/mo on the annual plan ($300/year) = 10,000 credits · Pro $90/mo or $75/mo annually ($900/year) = 40,000 credits · Ultra $300/mo or $250/mo annually ($3,000/year) = 150,000 credits · Team and Enterprise on request. (Source: lumalabs.ai/pricing)

Sources: lumalabs.ai · lumalabs.ai · openaffiliate.dev

Pictory

Turns text, a blog post, or a long video into a finished video with stock footage, an AI voice, and subtitles — classic content repurposing.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Grinding a blog post or script into a series of videos — marketing repurposing, not craft.

For it

  • Very fast from text to video — efficient for marketing repurposing
  • Free trial available

Against it

  • Useless for real film work; honestly classifiable only as a repurposing tool, not as a recommendation
  • Monthly prices are almost double the advertised annual prices

Pricing: Starter $29/month (annual $25, 200 min/month) · Professional $59/month (annual $35, 600 min/month) · Team $199/month (annual $119) · Enterprise on request · free trial. Source: https://pictory.ai/pricing/

Sources: pictory.ai · pictory.ai · pictory.ai · aiaffiliateprograms.ai

InVideo AI Advertising *

Prompt in, finished video out: script, stock footage, AI voice and edit in one pass, plus an editor to fix things up.

  • Free tier
  • watermark
Details

Getting a lot of video out of text fast — volume over signature.

For it

  • 120-day tracking window — by far the longest here
  • Runs through Impact.com (clean reporting, predictable payouts)

Against it

  • Results are generic and stock-heavy

Pricing: unverified — not confirmed against the official pricing page in this research; pull from https://invideo.io/pricing/ before publishing

Sources: invideo.io · help.invideo.io

Krea

Creative interface that bundles many image, video and 3D models under one UI — with real-time canvas, upscaling and your own LoRA training.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

The one subscription if you're a creative who wants to try many image/video models without coding.

For it

  • Over 60 models in one interface, one shared credit currency ("compute units") instead of 10 subscriptions
  • Real-time generation (realtime canvas) — you watch the image come into being as you draw
  • Generous free tier: 100 compute units per day, refreshed daily, no credit card
  • Covers image, video, 3D, lipsync, LoRA training and upscaling — the complete package for film people

Against it

  • Credit system obscures what a generation actually costs
  • Monthly credits expire; purchased packs after 90 days
  • Pricing page blocks automated requests — the figures below are partly only backed by secondary sources

Pricing: Free: 100 compute units per day (refilled daily). Paid according to third-party sources: Basic ~$9/month, Pro ~$35/month, Max ~$70/month, Business ~$200/month, plus Enterprise. ⚠️ The included unit amounts contradict each other between third-party sources (Max: 40,000 vs. 60,000 units) — the official page krea.ai/pricing blocks bots. Check yourself before recommending; do NOT present the numbers as verified.

Sources: krea.ai · costbench.com · tooljunction.io

Runway (Gen-4.5)

The pro platform for controlled AI video: camera controls, Motion Brush, reference-based character consistency — plus a built-in editor. Now also hosts third-party models.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Brand commercials where a character or product has to look identical across multiple shots and the camera can't be random.

For it

  • Granular creative control — camera moves, Motion Brush, reference images for consistent characters
  • Reference image control makes brand characters recognizable across multiple shots
  • Now bundles third-party frontier models into the subscription (Kling 3.0, Nano Banana Pro)
  • 4K upscaling and no watermark already on the cheapest paid plan (from $12)

Against it

  • Credits go fast: 625 credits on the Standard plan = ~52 seconds of Gen-4.5 for the entire month
  • Raw image quality now trails Veo 3.1 and Kling 3.0
  • Free tier with 125 one-time credits is barely more than a look

Pricing: Official pricing page (as of 07/2026): Free $0 (125 one-time credits) · Standard $12/month billed annually or $15 monthly (625 credits/month, ~52 sec of Gen-4.5) · Pro $28 annually or $35 monthly (2,250 credits) · Max $76 annually or $95 monthly (9,500 credits, 1 month rollover) · Enterprise on request. Standard and up: no watermark, 4K upscaling. Source: https://runwayml.com/pricing

Sources: runwayml.com · affiliates.runwayml.com · runwayml.com · zplatform.ai

Vidu (Q2/Q3, Shengshu)

The specialist for character consistency: you upload a character sheet from multiple angles, and the figure stays the same across every shot.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

When a brand character or a product has to look identical across an entire spot sequence — exactly the point where most AI commercials fall apart.

For it

  • Strongest reference-to-video control in the field: three or more images of a character/object from different angles as reference
  • The character stays consistent even when turning their head — arguably the best tool for narrative formats
  • Consistency also applies to objects and environments (multi-entity)
  • Very cheap: Vidu Q3 reference-to-video from ~$0.042/sec

Against it

  • Less well known, smaller community, fewer tutorials
  • Chinese platform — check rights questions as with Kling/Hailuo
  • Overall image quality below Veo 3.1 / Kling 3.0

Pricing: Free: 80 credits/month (~20 standard generations) plus unlimited generation outside peak hours (slower queue, no credit usage). Usage: Vidu Q3 reference-to-video from ~$0.042/sec, Vidu Q3-Mix ~$0.106/sec. Sources: https://www.vidu.com/pricing · https://www.atlascloud.ai/blog/guides/ai-video-model-cinematic-motion-control-storytelling-low-cost-2026

Sources: vidu.com · vidu.com · morphic.com · atlascloud.ai

Midjourney (Video)

The image market leader with a video model bolted on: unmatched aesthetics in stills, video as animation derived from them — no audio, short clips.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

Designing the look: Midjourney for the perfect source image, then image-to-video in Kling or Veo. That's actually how most good AI spots are made.

For it

  • Aesthetically the most distinctive visual language on the market — unbeatable as a source image for image-to-video
  • GPU-time model instead of credits: unlimited in Relax mode (Standard/Pro/Mega), just slower
  • Stealth mode (Pro/Mega) for private generation — relevant for NDA brand projects
  • Unused extra hours don't expire ($4/hour)

Against it

  • No native audio — unlike Veo, Kling, Seedance, LTX-2
  • Short clips (~5 sec per job)
  • Video costs ~8× as much GPU time as an image job — the Basic plan (3.3 GPU hours) is practically useless for video

Pricing: Basic $10/mo (3.3 fast GPU hours) · Standard $30/mo (15 hrs) · Pro $60/mo (30 hrs) · Mega $120/mo (60 hrs). Annual billing −20% ($8/24/48/96). Billed by GPU time, not per image: one still ≈ 1 GPU minute, one HD video batch ≈ 26 GPU minutes. Extra hours $4/hr, never expire. Sources: https://docs.midjourney.com/hc/en-us/articles/27870484040333-Comparing-Midjourney-Plans · https://www.eesel.ai/blog/midjourney-pricing

Sources: docs.midjourney.com · eesel.ai · fluxnote.io

Krea AI

Creative suite for image, video and 3D with a real-time canvas — you paint roughly, the AI renders along live. The most tactile tool in the field.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

Iterative, hands-on creative work instead of prompt lottery: real-time canvas, style transfer, enhancement. Ideal for film people to find a look fast.

For it

  • Real-time generation on the canvas — you direct instead of rolling the dice on prompts
  • Image, video and 3D under one roof
  • Many third-party models integrated — one interface, several engines
  • Free tier with 100 compute units/day

Against it

  • Per the sources, the 25% is meant more as a discount on your own subscription than as a payout model — clarify before promoting
  • Compute units hard to budget for
  • No frontier models of its own — Krea is an interface, not a lab

Pricing: Free: 100 compute units/day. Basic $8/mo. (5,000 units/mo., $63 annually). Pro $28/mo. (20,000 units, $252 annually). Max $48/mo. (60,000 units, $756 annually). Business $40/seat/mo. (80,000 units, $1,920 annually, up to 50 seats). Annual plan −40% on the consumer plans. Enterprise on request. Source: krea.ai/pricing.

Sources: krea.ai · krea.ai · krea.ai · x.com

fal.ai (fal)

Serverless inference platform built specifically for generative media — image, video, audio, 3D — with its own fast GPUs and billing per output.

  • Paid only
Details

When you're building image/video/audio models into your own tools via API and speed matters. The default building block for media AI in the backend.

For it

  • Media focus: Flux, Veo, Kling, Wan, Seedream, Nano Banana etc. through one API
  • Billing per successful output — no cost for server errors or queue time (official docs)
  • Noticeably faster on video than the generalists; low cold starts
  • Plain GPU rental also possible: H100 from $1.89/h, B200 from $3.49/h (discount prices per the pricing page)

Against it

  • Docs are considered messier than Replicate's
  • Costs run up fast on video (Veo 3: $0.40/second)

Pricing: Pure pay-per-use, no subscription. Examples per fal.ai/pricing: Seedream V4 $0.03/image · Flux Kontext Pro $0.04/image · Nano Banana $0.0398/image · Wan 2.5 $0.05/sec · Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro $0.07/sec · Veo 3 $0.40/sec. GPU rental (discount/list price): H100 $1.89/$3.99 · H200 $2.10/$4.50 · B200 $3.49/$6.25 · B300 $4.49/$8.50 · RTX PRO 6000 $1.10/$2.99 per hour.

Sources: fal.ai · fal.ai · fal.ai

Comfy Cloud (comfy.org)

ComfyUI in the cloud — straight from the ComfyUI makers: the node editor runs in the browser on rented GPUs, without a local install.

  • Paid only
  • local
Details

Running ComfyUI workflows without owning a machine with a beefy GPU — and with the original team behind it.

For it

  • From the original team — not a third-party copy; updates land here first
  • You're only billed for active GPU time while the workflow runs, not idle time
  • Extra credits valid for a year (not 90 days like with the consumer aggregators)

Against it

  • No free tier — entry is $20/month
  • Node editor: steep learning curve, nothing for occasional users
  • Minimum payout $100 — with little traffic the first payout takes a while

Pricing: No free tier. Standard $20/month (4,200 credits/month, ~380 videos of 5 sec., 30 min. max runtime per workflow, 1 parallel workflow via API) · Creator $35/month (7,400 credits, ~670 videos, custom LoRAs importable, 3 parallel workflows) · Pro $100/month (21,100 credits, ~1,915 videos, 1 h max runtime, 5 parallel workflows) · Enterprise on request. Extra credits purchasable anytime, valid 1 year.

Sources: comfy.org · comfy.org

RunComfy

Hosted ComfyUI plus a model playground and trainer — a third-party cloud that rents out ComfyUI machines by the hour and offers ready-made model APIs alongside.

  • Paid only
Details

When you want to run ComfyUI by the hour on large GPUs (up to H200) and also need ready-made model endpoints.

For it

  • Three things on one balance: ready-made models, ComfyUI machines and a trainer
  • Broad GPU selection from T4/A4000 up to H200
  • The Pro subscription brings a noticeable discount (20%+) plus $10 monthly credit and 200 GB persistent storage
  • Serverless API for ComfyUI workflows (docs.runcomfy.com) — you can run your own workflows as an endpoint

Against it

  • Purchased credit expires after 365 days
  • The Pro subscription does NOT replace the credit — you still need a balance to use it
  • Since Comfy.org runs its own cloud, the case for third-party providers has gotten narrower

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go without a subscription, shared balance across Models/ComfyUI/Trainer. GPU examples: Medium (T4, A4000) $0.99/h standard or $0.79/h with Pro · 3X-Large (H200) $9.59/h standard or $7.66/h with Pro. Model APIs: image $0.03–0.04/image, video $0.03–0.10/second. Pro subscription $19.99/month (annual $239.90, 33% savings): 20%+ GPU discount, 20 free CPU hours/month, $10 monthly credit, 200 GB persistent storage. Credit expires after 365 days.

Sources: runcomfy.com · docs.runcomfy.com

Runware

Price-aggressive inference API for image and video with a very large model catalog — the cheap alternative to fal and Replicate.

  • Paid only
Details

Image generation at volume, when price per image is the deciding criterion.

For it

  • By far the cheapest provider in the category for images (FLUX Schnell from $0.0006/image)
  • Very large model catalog (their own figure: 300,000+ models)
  • Failed requests are not billed

Against it

  • Less well known — recommending it takes more explaining
  • API only, no interface for non-developers
  • Price range very wide ($0.0006–0.24/image) — the cheap numbers apply to the small models

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go. Image generation $0.0006–0.24 per image depending on model, resolution and quality (examples: FLUX Schnell $0.0006, SD 3 $0.0019). Failed requests are free. Details: runware.ai/pricing or runware.ai/docs/platform/pricing.

Sources: runware.ai · runware.ai · techsy.io

OpenAI Sora 2 — WIRD ABGESCHALTET

OpenAI's video model that set off the hype in 2024 — and is being shut down in 2026. Listed here as a warning, not a recommendation.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

Nothing anymore. Anyone still sitting on the Sora API should migrate to Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0 or Seedance 2.0 before 2026-09-24.

For it

  • Historically: the thing that made the field popular in the first place
  • Strong physical plausibility and prompt understanding for its time
  • The API was widely available through aggregators

Against it

  • DEAD: the app and sora.com were shut down on 2026-04-26
  • The API ends on 2026-09-24 — any integration built on it is a dead end
  • All user data and generated videos will be deleted after the cutoff dates, with no guaranteed recovery window

Pricing: Of historical interest only, the API runs until 2026-09-24: Sora 2 Standard ~$0.10/sec (720p), Batch ~$0.05/sec. Sora 2 Pro ~$0.30/sec (720p), $0.50/sec (1024p), $0.70/sec (1080p), Batch roughly half. Sources: https://costgoat.com/pricing/sora · https://www.eesel.ai/blog/sora-2-pricing — DO NOT INVEST FURTHER.

Sources: help.openai.com · en.wikipedia.org · futurumgroup.com · costgoat.com

Seedance 2.0 (ByteDance)

ByteDance's flagship (Feb 2026): a multimodal model that takes up to 12 references and independently plans multi-shot sequences with camera moves, consistent characters, and lip-synced audio.

  • Paid only
Details

Entire commercial sequences from a single pass — when you need multiple shots with the same character and the same look, instead of painstakingly stitching individual shots together.

For it

  • Plans multi-shot sequences automatically — including camera movement and consistent characters throughout
  • Up to 12 reference inputs (text, image, audio, video) — the most comprehensive reference control in the field
  • Built-in physics engine for plausible motion
  • Native audio with correct lip sync

Against it

  • ByteDance origin: for brand and government clients, data provenance can be a dealbreaker
  • Pricing runs on tokens instead of seconds — hard to budget
  • Access outside China is primarily via third-party APIs, whose prices swing widely

Pricing: Official (Doubao-Seedance-2.0): 46 yuan (~$6.40) per million tokens for video generation only, 28 yuan (~$3.90) per million tokens for video editing. A 15-sec video consumes ~308,880 tokens = ~1 yuan or ~$0.14/sec. Source: https://technode.com/2026/03/05/bytedances-seedance-2-0-video-model-costs-about-0-14-per-second/ — Third-party APIs: from ~$0.045/sec (EvoLink) or $0.081–0.10/sec (AtlasCloud). Source: https://evolink.ai/seedance-2-0

Sources: seed.bytedance.com · technode.com · atlascloud.ai · evolink.ai

Wan 2.7 (Alibaba) — Open Source

Alibaba's open model line under Apache 2.0 — the legally cleanest option: weights, training code and inference free, commercial use with no license fees.

  • Free
  • commercial ok
  • EU
  • local
Details

Projects where the rights have to be uncompromisingly clean or the material can't leave the building — and for high volume, where per-second pricing hurts.

For it

  • Apache 2.0: commercial use with no license fees, no grant-back to the vendor — the best rights position in the entire field
  • Complete suite: text-to-video, image-to-video, reference-to-video with voice cloning, instruction-based video editing
  • Runs locally on your own hardware — material doesn't leave the building (relevant for NDA projects)
  • 1080p, 2–15 seconds, first/last frame control, multi-subject references

Against it

  • Self-hosting needs serious GPU hardware and a learning investment
  • Despite major progress, quality is below Veo 3.1 / Kling 3.0
  • Versions ship quarterly — documentation and tutorials go stale fast

Pricing: Model itself free (Apache 2.0, weights + training code + inference scripts open). Via API from ~$0.10/sec. Sources: https://www.cliprise.app/news/wan-2-7-video-release · https://www.alibabacloud.com/blog/alibaba-unveils-wan2-6-series-enabling-everyone-to-star-in-videos_602742

Sources: wan.video · cliprise.app · alibabacloud.com · technology.org

LTX-2 (Lightricks) — Open Source

First fully open model that generates native 4K AND synchronized audio in one pass — weights, training code and inference pipeline completely open.

  • Free
  • commercial ok
  • EU
  • local
Details

When a distinctive visual signature of your own is the goal: fine-tuning on your own material is simply not possible with the closed models.

For it

  • Native 4K up to 50 fps with synchronized audio in ONE pass — technically the most open frontier position
  • Fully open: not just weights, but training code and optimization tooling too — you can train your own variants
  • Picture and sound are generated together: motion, dialogue, ambience and music stay coherent
  • Up to 50% lower compute cost than comparable models; runs on consumer GPUs

Against it

  • Clip length limited (~10 sec, up to 20 sec depending on the source)
  • Requires technical ramp-up — not click-and-done
  • Prompt adherence and realism still below Veo 3.1

Pricing: Model free, open weights (released 01/06/2026). Operating cost = your own GPU time. Sources: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lightricks-releases-ltx-2-the-first-complete-open-source-ai-video-foundation-model-302593012.html · https://huggingface.co/Lightricks/LTX-2

Sources: ltx-2.ai · huggingface.co · github.com · prnewswire.com

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

Edit video

Shorts, subtitles, dubbing, avatars — the AI does the grunt work.

★ My pick ElevenLabs (Stimme + Eleven Music) — Beste Stimmqualität, dazu lizenzsichere Musik und Synchro — ein Abo, das man ohne Rechtsangst in echte Arbeit stecken kann.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

25 tools

ElevenLabs (Stimme + Eleven Music) Advertising *

The standard for AI voices — text-to-speech, voice cloning, dubbing — and since August 2025, with Eleven Music, also a licensed music generator.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

Voiceover, dubbing, audio drama, explainer video — and license-safe score for advertising. The workhorse of the category.

For it

  • Best voice quality on the market, many languages (incl. German)
  • Eleven Music is EXPLICITLY cleared for broad commercial use — licensing deals with Merlin (30,000 indie labels) and Kobalt
  • No lawsuit with the labels — the clean counter-model to Suno/Udio
  • ONE subscription covers voice and music

Against it

  • More expensive than Suno if you only want music
  • Eleven Music may NOT be used for commercial music libraries (stock music)
  • Industry exclusions in the Terms: weapons, tobacco, pharma, adult entertainment, religion, politics
  • Credits are used up fast if you iterate a lot

Pricing: Free $0 (10,000 credits, NO commercial license) · Starter $6/month (30,000 credits, commercial license from here on) · Creator $22/month (121,000 credits; first month 50% off) · Pro $99/month (600,000) · Scale $299/month · Business $990/month · Enterprise on request. Source: elevenlabs.io/pricing (as of July 2026).

Sources: elevenlabs.io · elevenlabs.io · techcrunch.com · businesswire.com

DaVinci Resolve (Blackmagic Design)

Full NLE plus color grading, Fairlight audio and Fusion VFX in one program, with AI via the "DaVinci Neural Engine" (Smart Reframe, Magic Mask, Voice Isolation, Super Scale, IntelliSearch, CineFocus).

  • Free tier
  • no sign-up
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
  • local
Details

Serious editing and color without a subscription — and for anything that must not leave the building.

For it

  • The free version is absurdly powerful — for many projects it's all you need
  • Studio costs $295 ONCE instead of a subscription — calculated over three years, the cheapest professional route
  • Best color grading on the market, no discussion
  • AI runs locally on your own machine: no cloud, no credits, no upload — GDPR-friendly and the only clean route for material under NDA

Against it

  • Steep learning curve; this is not a weekend tool
  • Hardware-hungry (GPU)
  • No long→short automation, no social auto-posting, no subtitle templates at Submagic level

Pricing: Free $0 · DaVinci Resolve Studio $295 one-time (perpetual license). Source: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve

Sources: blackmagicdesign.com · blackmagicdesign.com · blackmagicdesign.com

Murf.AI

Text-to-speech studio for voiceover, focused on business and explainer-video voices.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

For it

  • PartnerStack, low payout threshold ($5)
  • 90-day cookie that restarts on a repeat click
  • Solid, tidy studio interface with video sync

Against it

  • Voice quality trails ElevenLabs — hard to recommend when you're listing ElevenLabs alongside it
  • Prices not officially retrievable (JS-only)

Pricing: unsourced — murf.ai/pricing renders via JavaScript only, no reliable figures available for July 2026. Check yourself before publishing.

Sources: murf.ai · help.murf.ai · market.partnerstack.com

Opus Clip Advertising *

Upload a long video (file, YouTube, Zoom) and it automatically cuts vertical clips out of it with captions, auto-reframe and an estimated "Virality Score".

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Podcast or long video into a series of shorts, without hunting for the good bits yourself.

For it

  • The benchmark for long→short — most competitors describe themselves as an "Opus alternative"
  • ClipAnything: clips by image, object, emotion and genre, not just by spoken word (Starter and up)
  • Auto-reframe with speaker detection, usable for podcasts with several people
  • Direct posting to YouTube Shorts, TikTok, Instagram; brand kit with your own fonts

Against it

  • Credits = minutes of the SOURCE video: a 60-minute podcast eats 60 credits, whether 3 or 30 clips come out of it
  • Free exports carry a watermark and expire after 3 days
  • Starter storage expires after 29 days
  • The "Virality Score" is an estimate from the model, not evidence — don't resell it as a number

Pricing: Free $0 (60 processing minutes/month, watermark, exports expire after 3 days) · Starter $15/month · Pro $29/month · Business on request. Source: https://www.opus.pro/pricing

Sources: opus.pro · opus.pro · help.opus.pro · rewardful.com

Submagic Advertising *

Automatically adds animated captions, B-roll, zooms and sound effects to Shorts; the "Magic Clips" add-on additionally turns long videos into Shorts.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
  • EU
Details

Shorts that need to look like something — captions, B-roll and cutting rhythm in a single pass.

For it

  • The caption styles are the look half of TikTok runs — that's the actual reason you'd pick it
  • Very fast, very simple; no learning curve
  • B-roll, zooms and sound effects are placed automatically
  • API on the Business plan (100 min/month)

Against it

  • The core is captions/polish — the long→short automation costs $19/month extra (Magic Clips)
  • Hard unit limits: Starter only 15 videos/month, max 2 minutes per video
  • Free plan only 3 videos/month, max 1:30, with watermark
  • No real timeline editor — you fix mistakes elsewhere

Pricing: Free $0 (3 videos/month, max 200 MB / 1:30, watermark) · Starter $19/user/month (15 videos, max 2 min) · Pro $39/user/month (40 videos, max 5 min, 2K) · Business + API $69/user/month (100 videos, max 30 min, 4K/60 fps) · 41% cheaper annually · Magic Clips add-on +$19/month. Source: https://www.submagic.co/pricing

Sources: submagic.co · submagic.co · affiliate.submagic.co

Descript

Edit video by editing the transcript — delete a word in the text and it's out of the video. Plus Studio Sound, filler-word removal, Eye Contact, voice cloning and the AI co-editor "Underlord".

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Podcast/interview/talking head, when you want a clean cut fast and without fiddling around in a timeline.

For it

  • Text-based editing is a genuine workflow leap for talking head, interview, podcast
  • Studio Sound rescues mediocre audio surprisingly far
  • Filler words and pauses gone in one click
  • Translation/dubbing in 30+ languages (Business plan)

Against it

  • No substitute for an NLE on narrative work — no serious color grading, no node grading
  • Media hours AND AI credits are capped separately; you run into both limits
  • Gets noticeably sluggish on long projects

Pricing: Free $0 (60 min/month, 720p, 100 one-time AI credits) · Hobbyist $24/month ($16 annually) · Creator $35/month ($24 annually, 30 h/month, Underlord) · Business $65/month ($50 annually, 40 h, Dubbing) · Enterprise on request. Source: https://www.descript.com/pricing

Sources: descript.com · descript.com · descript.com · help.descript.com

CapCut

ByteDance's free editor (mobile, desktop, web) with a full AI toolkit: auto captions, auto reframe, background removal, AI tools, huge template library.

  • Free tier
  • German
Details

Fast social editing, especially on the phone, and anything headed for TikTok.

For it

  • Free version already gets you very far — the de facto standard for social editing
  • Hooked directly into TikTok; templates that work there are one click away
  • Mobile-first: editing on the phone is not a compromise

Against it

  • ByteDance — for a German audience a privacy and platform risk that should be named on the page
  • Pricing overhaul in early 2026: the former Pro is now called Standard (~$10), the new Pro costs $19.99
  • Prices differ by region and platform; iOS/Android are more expensive than the web checkout because of app store fees
  • No long→short automation at Opus level

Pricing: Free $0 · Standard approx. $10/month · Pro $19.99/month or $179.99/year · Team $24.99/user/month. On iOS/Android the in-app prices are higher (~$21.99–22.99). Prices vary by region/platform/promotion. Sources: https://www.capcut.com/help/how-much-does-capcut-pro-cost + https://costbench.com/software/video-editing/capcut/ — verify against the DE checkout before publishing

Sources: capcut.com · capcut.com · costbench.com · capcut.com

HeyGen

AI avatars, voice cloning and video translation with lip sync — including a digital twin of yourself.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

Getting one video into twelve languages without shooting twelve times — and explainer/marketing content without a camera.

For it

  • Best lip sync on translations — the video looks like you spoke the language yourself
  • Your own digital twin from a few minutes of material
  • 175+ languages, API available
  • Free tier (3 videos/month) for testing

Against it

  • Avatars still look synthetic on close inspection — useless for narrative cinema
  • Credit system is opaque: 3–20 credits per minute depending on the avatar engine
  • Pro plan scales steeply (up to $4,300/month)

Pricing: Free $0 (3 videos/month, max. 1 min) · Creator $29/month ($24 billed annually, 600 credits) · Pro from $49/month · Business $149/month + $20/seat · Enterprise on request. Source: https://www.heygen.com/pricing

Sources: heygen.com · heygen.com · heygen.getrewardful.com · uppromote.com

Synthesia Advertising *

AI avatar videos from text for companies — training, onboarding, explainers; 240+ avatars, 140+ languages, SCORM export for learning platforms.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • EU
Details

Corporate content in many languages — training, product, onboarding — when nobody wants to go on camera.

For it

  • Enterprise-ready: SOC 2, SCORM export, team management — that's what companies buy, not hobbyists
  • Very clean translations and voices
  • Free tier with 10 minutes of video/month

Against it

  • Corporate look — the wrong tool for storytelling, film or personality
  • The Creator plan at $89/month is expensive
  • The credit logic (1,200 credits ≈ 10 min) takes some figuring out

Pricing: Basic/Free $0 (1,200 credits ≈ 10 min/month, 9 avatars, no download) · Starter $29/month ($18 annually) · Creator $89/month ($64 annually) · Enterprise on request. Source: https://www.synthesia.io/pricing

Sources: synthesia.io · synthesia.io · synthesia.io · synthesia.getrewardful.com

Argil Advertising *

You clone yourself once via video and then have the clone speak your shorts daily — built for creator content, not corporate.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
  • EU
Details

Posting shorts daily without standing in front of the camera daily.

For it

  • The clones come across as more creator-like/alive than classic corporate avatars
  • Built exactly for the faceless/daily-shorts case, including magic editing
  • API access even on the cheapest tier
  • 30% over 12 months via Tolt — one of the better programs

Against it

  • Expensive: Classic $39, Pro $149
  • Clone quality depends heavily on the training material — bad light, bad clone
  • Young company (YC/Seedcamp) — platform risk

Pricing: 5-day free trial · Classic $39/month ($27 annually, 1,600 credits ≈ 25 min) · Pro $149/month ($104 annually, 6,000 credits ≈ 100 min) · Scale $499/month ($349 annually) · Enterprise on request. Source: https://www.argil.ai/pricing

Sources: argil.ai · docs.argil.ai · ycombinator.com

Vizard Advertising *

Long→short clipper with an editor: cuts clips out of long videos, reframes them to 9:16 automatically, adds subtitles and posts directly.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Long→short with post-editing, when Opus is too expensive.

For it

  • Free tier without a card (60 credits, 1 credit = 1 minute of source video)
  • Cheaper entry point than Opus, with a real post-editing editor
  • Team/workspace features already in the Business plan

Against it

  • Significantly smaller than Opus/Submagic — model quality at finding clips lags behind Opus
  • Free export only 720p, storage 3 days
  • The official pricing page renders the amounts dynamically — prices are hard to pin down and fluctuate with promotions

Pricing: Free $0 (60 credits/month, 720p, 1 social account, 3 days storage) · Creator approx. $29/user/month · Business approx. $39/user/month (source for the amounts: https://www.capterra.com/p/10009818/Vizard/pricing/ — the official page https://vizard.ai/pricing only shows prices dynamically; up to 50% off annually). VERIFY YOURSELF IN THE BROWSER BEFORE PUBLISHING.

Sources: vizard.ai · vizard.ai · vizard-corp.getrewardful.com · help.vizard.ai

VEED

Fully browser-based video editor with AI: subtitles, translation, eye-contact correction, clean audio, avatars, Magic Cut.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
  • EU
Details

Subtitles, translation and quick edits straight in the browser — even from someone else's machine.

For it

  • Runs in the browser, nothing to install — the lowest barrier to entry in the category
  • Very good subtitle and translation workflow (50+ languages on Pro)

Against it

  • Credit system: annual credits expire at the end of the year, unused = gone
  • Pricing structure reworked in 2026 (Free/Creator/Pro/Studio/Enterprise) — the official page loads prices dynamically, the numbers are hard to substantiate
  • Cookie duration not officially documented anywhere; third-party sources contradict each other (7 vs. 30 days)
  • Too lightweight for serious editing

Pricing: Free $0 · Creator approx. $10/user/month · Pro approx. $21/user/month · Studio approx. $35/user/month (each billed annually) · Enterprise on request. Source: https://checkthat.ai/brands/veed/pricing — the official page https://www.veed.io/pricing renders the amounts dynamically. VERIFY YOURSELF BEFORE PUBLISHING.

Sources: veed.io · veed.io · checkthat.ai · support.veed.io

Kapwing

Browser editor with AI tools: auto captions, clip maker from long video, repurposing and real team collaboration in the workspace.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Team editing in the browser and fast repurposing when several people are cutting together.

For it

  • Collaboration in the browser — several people on the same project without shuffling files
  • Approval within 24 hours
  • Good value on Pro

Against it

  • Free export is 720p only and watermarked
  • The Pro price ($16) only applies with annual billing
  • The AI clip feature is weaker than Opus/Submagic — Kapwing is an editor first, an automat second
  • Platinum/VIP additionally require collaboration videos, not just revenue

Pricing: Free $0 (720p, watermark) · Pro $16/month billed annually ($192/year) · Business $50/month billed annually ($600/year). Source: https://www.kapwing.com/pricing (amounts also at https://checkthat.ai/brands/kapwing/pricing) — double-check before publishing

Sources: kapwing.com · kapwing.com · checkthat.ai

Filmora (Wondershare)

Beginner-friendly desktop editor with a thick AI package (Smart Cutout, AI Copilot, Text-to-Video, Auto Reframe, AI music).

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
Details

For it

  • Considerably cheaper than Adobe, faster to learn for beginners
  • Huge tutorial/YouTube niche — converts well
  • Choice of networks (CJ, Awin, LinkConnector, Rakuten) — you can go with whichever you already have an account on

Against it

  • Consumer reputation: not a professional NLE, XML exchange with a production is a crutch
  • Aggressive upsells and permanent discount campaigns
  • Prices change so often that a fixed figure on the page is quickly wrong

Pricing: unverified — Wondershare runs constantly changing promotional prices; for the index, pull the current figure directly from https://filmora.wondershare.com/store/ and date it

Sources: filmora.wondershare.com · wondershare.com · uppromote.com

Pictory

Turns text, a blog post, or a long video into a finished video with stock footage, an AI voice, and subtitles — classic content repurposing.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Grinding a blog post or script into a series of videos — marketing repurposing, not craft.

For it

  • Very fast from text to video — efficient for marketing repurposing
  • Free trial available

Against it

  • Useless for real film work; honestly classifiable only as a repurposing tool, not as a recommendation
  • Monthly prices are almost double the advertised annual prices

Pricing: Starter $29/month (annual $25, 200 min/month) · Professional $59/month (annual $35, 600 min/month) · Team $199/month (annual $119) · Enterprise on request · free trial. Source: https://pictory.ai/pricing/

Sources: pictory.ai · pictory.ai · pictory.ai · aiaffiliateprograms.ai

InVideo AI Advertising *

Prompt in, finished video out: script, stock footage, AI voice and edit in one pass, plus an editor to fix things up.

  • Free tier
  • watermark
Details

Getting a lot of video out of text fast — volume over signature.

For it

  • 120-day tracking window — by far the longest here
  • Runs through Impact.com (clean reporting, predictable payouts)

Against it

  • Results are generic and stock-heavy

Pricing: unverified — not confirmed against the official pricing page in this research; pull from https://invideo.io/pricing/ before publishing

Sources: invideo.io · help.invideo.io

Riverside

Studio-quality remote recording (every track is recorded locally, not over the connection) plus AI editing and "Magic Clips", which turn the recording straight into shorts.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Recording interviews and podcasts remotely without dying on audio quality — and pulling shorts straight out of them.

For it

  • Best remote interview recording on the market — up to 4K locally, no Zoom mush
  • Magic Clips cuts shorts straight out of the recording, no tool switch
  • Text-based editing integrated

Against it

  • The editing is an add-on — no NLE, just tidying up
  • The $200 payout threshold is the highest on this list
  • Magic Clips only usable in any meaningful way from the Pro plan up

Pricing: Free tier available (Magic Clips limited) · Pro $29/month (includes Magic Clips). Source: https://riverside.com/pricing (figure confirmed through third-party sources) — double-check yourself before publishing

Sources: riverside.com · riverside.com · support.riverside.com · rewardful.com

Klap Advertising *

Long→short clipper: upload a long video, it cuts clips, reframes, captions, dubs into 29 languages (Pro and up).

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Long→short including dubbing, when the clip also needs to run in Spanish, French, Thai.

For it

  • 30% recurring for life — on par with Submagic in terms of conditions
  • AI dubbing in 29 languages from Pro up
  • Low payout threshold ($20)
  • Free tier to try it out

Against it

  • Small vendor, smaller team — platform risk
  • Pricing structure hard to verify: the official pricing page renders the amounts dynamically
  • Cookie duration not documented

Pricing: Free tier available; Starter approx. $29/month, Pro approx. $79/month, Pro+ approx. $189/month (annual roughly 20% cheaper) — amounts from third-party sources (https://dupple.com/tools/klap-ai, https://superdirector.app/compare/opusclip-vs-klap); the official page https://klap.app/pricing renders prices dynamically only. CHECK YOURSELF BEFORE PUBLISHING.

Sources: klap.app · klap.app · dupple.com

Runway (Gen-4.5)

The pro platform for controlled AI video: camera controls, Motion Brush, reference-based character consistency — plus a built-in editor. Now also hosts third-party models.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Brand commercials where a character or product has to look identical across multiple shots and the camera can't be random.

For it

  • Granular creative control — camera moves, Motion Brush, reference images for consistent characters
  • Reference image control makes brand characters recognizable across multiple shots
  • Now bundles third-party frontier models into the subscription (Kling 3.0, Nano Banana Pro)
  • 4K upscaling and no watermark already on the cheapest paid plan (from $12)

Against it

  • Credits go fast: 625 credits on the Standard plan = ~52 seconds of Gen-4.5 for the entire month
  • Raw image quality now trails Veo 3.1 and Kling 3.0
  • Free tier with 125 one-time credits is barely more than a look

Pricing: Official pricing page (as of 07/2026): Free $0 (125 one-time credits) · Standard $12/month billed annually or $15 monthly (625 credits/month, ~52 sec of Gen-4.5) · Pro $28 annually or $35 monthly (2,250 credits) · Max $76 annually or $95 monthly (9,500 credits, 1 month rollover) · Enterprise on request. Standard and up: no watermark, 4K upscaling. Source: https://runwayml.com/pricing

Sources: runwayml.com · affiliates.runwayml.com · runwayml.com · zplatform.ai

Topaz Labs (Gigapixel · Photo · Video · Bloom · Astra)

The reference for upscaling and cleaning up image and video — subscription-only since 2026, with Bloom and Astra as two models built specifically for AI-generated material.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
  • local
Details

For it

  • Bloom (image) and Astra (video) are built explicitly for AI output: they bring generated clips up to real 4K quality — the last mile the video generators don't deliver themselves
  • Astra detects cuts automatically and applies its own settings per scene instead of steamrolling everything globally
  • The quality is the industry standard — Krea licenses Topaz models for its own upscaler
  • Broad range: desktop apps, cloud web apps and ComfyUI integration

Against it

  • Perpetual licenses were discontinued in September 2025 — it's subscriptions only now, existing owners keep their version
  • Expensive: the full Studio bundle costs $399/year, Studio Pro $799/year
  • No free tier on the pricing page
  • The product range (Photo, Video, Gigapixel, Astra, Bloom, Image Web, Mosaic) has become hard to keep track of

Pricing: Subscription only, no free tier. Desktop: Gigapixel $29/mo or $149/year · Photo $39/mo or $199/year · Video $59/mo or $299/year. Cloud: Astra (video upscale) from $19/mo · Bloom (creative image upscale) $39/mo or $229/year · Image Web from $12/mo. Bundle: Studio $69/mo or $399/year, Studio Pro $799/year. (Source: topazlabs.com/pricing)

Sources: topazlabs.com · topazlabs.com · topazlabs.com · topazlabs.com

Autodesk Flow Studio (ehemals Wonder Studio / Wonder Dynamics)

Automatically turns live-action footage into editable CG scenes: actors are detected, tracked and replaced with 3D characters — including mocap, camera and lighting.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

For it

  • The most interesting tool on this list for a filmmaker in terms of content: VFX work that used to need a team, from a single file
  • Free tier since 2025 — also usable as a pure AI mocap service
  • Prices cut sharply: Lite from $20 to $10/mo., Pro from $99.99 to $95/mo.
  • The Pro tier is included in Autodesk's Media & Entertainment Collection at no extra cost

Against it

  • The free tier watermarks the output
  • The credit system noticeably limits runtime
  • Since the Autodesk acquisition an agile startup has become a corporate product — pace and community have suffered

Pricing: Free (watermarked output, usable as AI mocap) · Lite $10/mo. = 2,100 credits/mo. · Standard $45/mo. or $360/year = 6,000 credits/mo. · Pro $95/mo. or $765/year = 12,000 credits/mo. (Source: Autodesk investor announcement on the freemium launch + cgchannel.com/2025/08/autodesk-cuts-prices-of-flow-studio-subscriptions/)

Sources: autodesk.com · investors.autodesk.com · cgchannel.com · autodesk.com

Gling Advertising *

AI editor built specifically for YouTubers: automatically cuts silences, filler words and bad takes out of talking-head footage — and exports XML to Premiere, Final Cut or Resolve.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

The rough cut of a talking-head video — silences and "uhm" out — before you really edit in Premiere/Resolve.

For it

  • XML export: the rough cut lands in a real professional program, no lock-in — almost none of the competitors can do this
  • Free tier with 1 hour of footage per month
  • Actually used by large YouTube channels
  • Affordable (Plus $10/month annual)

Against it

  • Talking-head only — no reframe, no shorts automation, no caption templates at Submagic's level
  • Free exports carry a watermark
  • Cookie duration and payout threshold not documented

Pricing: Free $0 (1 h AI editing/month, watermark) · Plus $20/month (annual $10, 10 h) · Pro $40/month (annual $20, 30 h) · Elite $100/month (annual $50, 100 h). Source: https://www.gling.ai/pricing

Sources: gling.ai · affiliates.gling.ai · gling.ai

Seedance 2.0 (ByteDance)

ByteDance's flagship (Feb 2026): a multimodal model that takes up to 12 references and independently plans multi-shot sequences with camera moves, consistent characters, and lip-synced audio.

  • Paid only
Details

Entire commercial sequences from a single pass — when you need multiple shots with the same character and the same look, instead of painstakingly stitching individual shots together.

For it

  • Plans multi-shot sequences automatically — including camera movement and consistent characters throughout
  • Up to 12 reference inputs (text, image, audio, video) — the most comprehensive reference control in the field
  • Built-in physics engine for plausible motion
  • Native audio with correct lip sync

Against it

  • ByteDance origin: for brand and government clients, data provenance can be a dealbreaker
  • Pricing runs on tokens instead of seconds — hard to budget
  • Access outside China is primarily via third-party APIs, whose prices swing widely

Pricing: Official (Doubao-Seedance-2.0): 46 yuan (~$6.40) per million tokens for video generation only, 28 yuan (~$3.90) per million tokens for video editing. A 15-sec video consumes ~308,880 tokens = ~1 yuan or ~$0.14/sec. Source: https://technode.com/2026/03/05/bytedances-seedance-2-0-video-model-costs-about-0-14-per-second/ — Third-party APIs: from ~$0.045/sec (EvoLink) or $0.081–0.10/sec (AtlasCloud). Source: https://evolink.ai/seedance-2-0

Sources: seed.bytedance.com · technode.com · atlascloud.ai · evolink.ai

Wan 2.7 (Alibaba) — Open Source

Alibaba's open model line under Apache 2.0 — the legally cleanest option: weights, training code and inference free, commercial use with no license fees.

  • Free
  • commercial ok
  • EU
  • local
Details

Projects where the rights have to be uncompromisingly clean or the material can't leave the building — and for high volume, where per-second pricing hurts.

For it

  • Apache 2.0: commercial use with no license fees, no grant-back to the vendor — the best rights position in the entire field
  • Complete suite: text-to-video, image-to-video, reference-to-video with voice cloning, instruction-based video editing
  • Runs locally on your own hardware — material doesn't leave the building (relevant for NDA projects)
  • 1080p, 2–15 seconds, first/last frame control, multi-subject references

Against it

  • Self-hosting needs serious GPU hardware and a learning investment
  • Despite major progress, quality is below Veo 3.1 / Kling 3.0
  • Versions ship quarterly — documentation and tutorials go stale fast

Pricing: Model itself free (Apache 2.0, weights + training code + inference scripts open). Via API from ~$0.10/sec. Sources: https://www.cliprise.app/news/wan-2-7-video-release · https://www.alibabacloud.com/blog/alibaba-unveils-wan2-6-series-enabling-everyone-to-star-in-videos_602742

Sources: wan.video · cliprise.app · alibabacloud.com · technology.org

Adobe Premiere Pro (Firefly-AI)

The industry NLE, now with generative AI in the program: Generative Extend, Object Masking, Media Intelligence search; April 2026 added Color Mode (beta), refined Object Masking (Sharp/Smooth), Film Impact effects and a searchable Sequence Index.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
  • German
Details

Anything that's a real edit — commissioned work, film, advertising — with AI as an accelerator, not an autopilot.

For it

  • Industry standard — XML/exchange with everyone, every editor knows it
  • AI sits IN the editing program, not in a separate cloud app next to it
  • Firefly models are cleared for commercial use (legal certainty for commissioned work)
  • After Effects, Audition, Frame.io right alongside

Against it

  • Expensive as a subscription, and the AI features consume additional Firefly credits on top
  • No long→short automation, no social autoposting — too slow for shorts factories
  • Subscription lock-in; cancelling mid-year on an annual contract costs you

Pricing: Premiere Pro single app from $20.99/month on an annual plan, or $31.49/month month-to-month; Creative Cloud All Apps $54.99/month; Firefly add-on plans from $9.99/month (2,000 premium credits). Sources: https://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/plans.html + https://checkthat.ai/brands/adobe-premiere/pricing — the Adobe page loads the amounts dynamically; verify German prices (€) at the German checkout before publishing

Sources: adobe.com · adobe.com · blog.adobe.com · uppromote.com

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

Make music

Songs, beats, sound design. Careful: read the rights.

★ My pick ElevenLabs (Stimme + Eleven Music) — Beste Stimmqualität, dazu lizenzsichere Musik und Synchro — ein Abo, das man ohne Rechtsangst in echte Arbeit stecken kann.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

11 tools

ElevenLabs (Stimme + Eleven Music) Advertising *

The standard for AI voices — text-to-speech, voice cloning, dubbing — and since August 2025, with Eleven Music, also a licensed music generator.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

Voiceover, dubbing, audio drama, explainer video — and license-safe score for advertising. The workhorse of the category.

For it

  • Best voice quality on the market, many languages (incl. German)
  • Eleven Music is EXPLICITLY cleared for broad commercial use — licensing deals with Merlin (30,000 indie labels) and Kobalt
  • No lawsuit with the labels — the clean counter-model to Suno/Udio
  • ONE subscription covers voice and music

Against it

  • More expensive than Suno if you only want music
  • Eleven Music may NOT be used for commercial music libraries (stock music)
  • Industry exclusions in the Terms: weapons, tobacco, pharma, adult entertainment, religion, politics
  • Credits are used up fast if you iterate a lot

Pricing: Free $0 (10,000 credits, NO commercial license) · Starter $6/month (30,000 credits, commercial license from here on) · Creator $22/month (121,000 credits; first month 50% off) · Pro $99/month (600,000) · Scale $299/month · Business $990/month · Enterprise on request. Source: elevenlabs.io/pricing (as of July 2026).

Sources: elevenlabs.io · elevenlabs.io · techcrunch.com · businesswire.com

Suno

The best-known text-to-song generator: prompt in, finished track with vocals out.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

Quick song ideas, demos, moodtapes — with caution for paid advertising as long as UMG/Sony are suing.

For it

  • Best song quality with vocals in the mass market
  • Very cheap (Pro $8/month per the pricing page)
  • Warner Music deal signed (Nov 2025) — first licensing partnership
  • Huge community, plenty of learning material

Against it

  • UMG and Sony are STILL suing — settlement talks collapsed in April 2026; the legal risk is not resolved
  • Terms quietly softened: per the updated docs, users are 'generally not considered the owner' of the songs, even though commercial use is permitted
  • Download restrictions announced: free tier to lose downloads, paid tiers to get a monthly download cap
  • No retroactive commercial license: what you made for free does NOT become commercially usable through a later subscription

Pricing: Free $0 (50 credits daily, NO commercial use, attribution required) · Pro $8/month (2,500 credits, commercial rights) · Premier $24/month (10,000 credits, commercial rights). Source: suno.com/pricing (as of July 2026; the amounts likely correspond to the annual billing rate).

Sources: suno.com · suno.com · digitalmusicnews.com · digitalmusicnews.com

Udio

The second big song generator — a walled garden since the UMG settlement, with nothing coming out of it.

  • Free tier
Details

Currently NOT recommended for professional work — you can't export your tracks.

For it

  • Historically very good audio quality, popular with musicians
  • First provider to settle with UMG AND Warner — the future platform will be fully licensed
  • Artists are compensated for training and generation (opt-in)

Against it

  • DOWNLOAD SWITCHED OFF: after the UMG settlement (29 Oct 2025), users can no longer download their tracks — streaming only
  • Users got merely a 48-hour window (starting 3 Nov 2025) to rescue their back catalogue; after that it was over
  • 'Walled garden': what you generate may not leave the platform — no use in film, advertising, YouTube
  • The licensed relaunch was announced for 2026 but has (as of June 2026) NOT shipped

Pricing: unsourced — the pricing page is only retrievable via JavaScript, no reliable figures for July 2026 to be found. Given the missing export, secondary anyway.

Sources: musicbusinessworldwide.com · musicbusinessworldwide.com · billboard.com · dynamoi.com

Soundraw

Music generator for video people: pick mood, genre, length, tweak the track, download.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

YouTube, social, podcasts, livestreams — a fast score without license anxiety. For actual commercials: ask first.

For it

  • Very fast and usable without any music knowledge
  • Clear, readable license page (a rarity in this category)
  • Commercial use on all paid plans

Against it

  • Content ID registration prohibited, distribution of unmodified tracks prohibited
  • Streaming release (Spotify etc.) only after substantial editing — the track has to sound 'clearly different'
  • For meditation/lo-fi content with unmodified tracks: publication only for as long as the subscription runs

Pricing: unverified — the official pricing page isn't directly retrievable (404 or JS-only); third-party sources cite contradictory figures between roughly $11 and $32/month (Creator to Artist Unlimited plans). Check soundraw.io itself before publishing. Verified: all Artist plans include a perpetual commercial license.

Sources: soundraw.io · affiliates.soundraw.io · docs.channel.io · soundraw.io

Mubert Advertising *

Generative music stream and track generator, strong in the API/platform business.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

For it

  • Clear tier structure by type of use (social → advertising → agency)
  • Good API for developer integrations
  • Free entry tier (25 tracks/month, non-commercial)

Against it

  • Content ID registration explicitly prohibited
  • Release on streaming services (Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube Music …) explicitly prohibited
  • Resale/distribution prohibited
  • Advertising requires at least the Pro tier ($39) — the Creator tier ($14) does NOT cover advertising

Pricing: Free/Ambassador $0 (25 tracks/month, personal use only) · Creator $14/month (social media, NO advertising) · Pro $39/month (digital advertising, TV/radio spots, freelance client work, indie games) · Business $199/month (in-app music, large games, agency work) · API/Enterprise on request. Source: mubert.com/render/license or /render/pricing.

Sources: mubert.com · mubert.com · mubert.com · mubert.getrewardful.com

Beatoven.ai

Music generator for videos and podcasts, focused on mood and scene length.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

Scores for YouTube videos, podcasts, advertising — with one of the most user-friendly licenses.

For it

  • PERPETUAL non-exclusive license: the rights to the downloaded track do NOT expire on cancellation — a real advantage over Soundraw/Suno
  • Advertising is explicitly named as a permitted use case
  • Stems available (for your own remixes/sampling)
  • Cheap

Against it

  • Direct release on Spotify/Apple Music not permitted
  • Beatoven retains ownership of the track (license, not a transfer of rights)
  • Musically less impressive than Suno — functional underscore, not songs

Pricing: unverified — the pricing page (beatoven.ai/pricing) returns 404 or renders only via JS; third-party sources cite contradictory figures (approx. $3 to $17/month). Verified from their own site: 'You get a non-exclusive perpetual licence for the generated and downloaded track.'

Sources: beatoven.ai · beatoven.ai

Loudly

AI music generator with stem export and built-in distribution, Berlin-based provider.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • EU
Details

Social media content and games; for TV/cinema only under a separate agreement.

For it

  • Cheap (Personal $8/month on the annual plan)
  • Stems, sample packs and stem splitter included
  • Distribution (Distro Plus) included
  • European provider

Against it

  • IMPORTANT: Physical products, out-of-home advertising, TV broadcast, IPTV, VOD, cinema and theatre are NOT covered by the standard license — those require a separate commercial agreement (usually within 24 h, according to Loudly)
  • Downloads capped (300 or 500/month)
  • Less well known than Suno

Pricing: Personal $8/month (billed annually; 900 track creations, 300 downloads, MP3+WAV, commercial license) · Pro $24/month (annually; 3,000 creations, 500 downloads, tracks up to 30 min). Source: loudly.com/music/pricing + loudly.com/license-agreement.

Sources: loudly.com · loudly.com · loudly.com

Stable Audio (Stability AI)

Music and sound design generator trained exclusively on licensed data — built for professional audio production.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • local
Details

Sound design, foley, atmos, and score when the chain of rights has to be watertight (agency and broadcast work).

For it

  • Trained on a fully licensed dataset — 'commercially safe' isn't marketing fluff here
  • Strategic alliances with Universal Music Group AND Warner Music Group
  • Strong at sound design/SFX, not just songs
  • New model (May 2026) generates pieces up to six minutes long

Against it

  • Companies with over $1M in revenue need an enterprise license
  • Less 'wow' on vocal songs than Suno
  • Pricing for end users poorly documented

Pricing: unverified — the pricing page (stableaudio.com/pricing) renders only via JavaScript, no reliable figures retrievable. The only thing verified: from $1M in company revenue, an enterprise license is required.

Sources: stability.ai · stability.ai · techcrunch.com · stableaudio.com

Kits.AI

Voice conversion and singing models for musicians: turn your own vocal take into another (licensed) voice.

  • Free tier
Details

Music production — demo vocals, harmonies, vocal doubles, without booking a singer.

For it

  • Voices are ETHICALLY licensed and bought directly from the artists; artists get a revenue share
  • Clear niche focus (singing, not speech)
  • Stem splitter and mastering tools on board as well
  • Cheap entry point

Against it

  • License/commercial terms are NOT stated on the pricing page — you have to read the terms or ask (ugly for a rights-sensitive tool)
  • Download minutes are capped (the conversions are not)
  • Niche — low search volume

Pricing: Free $0 (15 conversion minutes, 0 download minutes) · Starter $10/month (15 download minutes, 2 voice slots) · Producer $30/month (60 download minutes, unlimited slots) · Professional $60/month (unlimited downloads). Source: kits.ai/pricing (as of July 2026).

Sources: kits.ai · kits.ai

AIVA

AI composer focused on orchestral and cinematic music — the score specialist.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • EU
Details

Film music, trailers, games — and the only provider that transfers the copyright in the result to you.

For it

  • The Pro tier transfers FULL copyright in the track to the user — unique in this list
  • No attribution requirement on Pro
  • Editor for reworking the composition (not just prompt roulette)

Against it

  • The rights transfer only applies to individuals or small companies with less than $300,000 annual revenue OR fewer than 3 employees — larger companies need something else
  • Lower tiers have severely restricted commercial rights
  • No vocals

Pricing: Pro approx. €33/month billed annually (300 downloads/month, all formats incl. WAV, full copyright). Free and Standard tiers with restricted commercial rights. Source: aiva.ai/legal/1 + AIVA helpdesk; verify exact current prices before publishing.

Sources: aiva.ai · aiva.crisp.help

LANDR

AI mastering (the classic), plus distribution, samples and plugins — not a generator, a finisher.

  • Free tier
Details

Getting the finished track (an AI track too) to broadcast quality. Complements every generator instead of competing with it.

For it

  • Established and respected — the standard for fast mastering for years
  • Complements the generators perfectly: AI track out → LANDR over it → broadcast-ready
  • 'Fair Trade AI' program: training data with consent and compensation

Against it

  • Application required, LANDR reserves the right to reject without giving a reason
  • Not a music generator — only fits the list as a complement
  • Payout exclusively via PayPal

Pricing: unverified — subscription prices not reliably retrievable from the pricing page. Verified: referrals get 20% off the first subscription or the mastering plugin (first payment only, renewals at full price).

Sources: landr.com · landr.com

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

Voice & speech

Read aloud, clone, transcribe, dub.

★ My pick ElevenLabs (Stimme + Eleven Music) — Beste Stimmqualität, dazu lizenzsichere Musik und Synchro — ein Abo, das man ohne Rechtsangst in echte Arbeit stecken kann.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

14 tools

ElevenLabs (Stimme + Eleven Music) Advertising *

The standard for AI voices — text-to-speech, voice cloning, dubbing — and since August 2025, with Eleven Music, also a licensed music generator.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

Voiceover, dubbing, audio drama, explainer video — and license-safe score for advertising. The workhorse of the category.

For it

  • Best voice quality on the market, many languages (incl. German)
  • Eleven Music is EXPLICITLY cleared for broad commercial use — licensing deals with Merlin (30,000 indie labels) and Kobalt
  • No lawsuit with the labels — the clean counter-model to Suno/Udio
  • ONE subscription covers voice and music

Against it

  • More expensive than Suno if you only want music
  • Eleven Music may NOT be used for commercial music libraries (stock music)
  • Industry exclusions in the Terms: weapons, tobacco, pharma, adult entertainment, religion, politics
  • Credits are used up fast if you iterate a lot

Pricing: Free $0 (10,000 credits, NO commercial license) · Starter $6/month (30,000 credits, commercial license from here on) · Creator $22/month (121,000 credits; first month 50% off) · Pro $99/month (600,000) · Scale $299/month · Business $990/month · Enterprise on request. Source: elevenlabs.io/pricing (as of July 2026).

Sources: elevenlabs.io · elevenlabs.io · techcrunch.com · businesswire.com

Murf.AI

Text-to-speech studio for voiceover, focused on business and explainer-video voices.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

For it

  • PartnerStack, low payout threshold ($5)
  • 90-day cookie that restarts on a repeat click
  • Solid, tidy studio interface with video sync

Against it

  • Voice quality trails ElevenLabs — hard to recommend when you're listing ElevenLabs alongside it
  • Prices not officially retrievable (JS-only)

Pricing: unsourced — murf.ai/pricing renders via JavaScript only, no reliable figures available for July 2026. Check yourself before publishing.

Sources: murf.ai · help.murf.ai · market.partnerstack.com

Speechify

Read-aloud app (text-to-speech) for books, PDFs, and articles — plus a voiceover studio.

  • Free tier
Details

Consumption (listening to text), less so production.

For it

  • Very large audience and high brand recognition (also outside the creative niche)
  • Huge selection of voices and languages

Against it

  • Only a 30-day cookie — short; for an index site that banks on long-term research clicks, a real drawback
  • Commercial usage rights NOT clearly stated on the pricing page (the commercial product is 'Speechify Studio' with its own prices)
  • More a consumption than a production tool — only marginally fits media AI

Pricing: Free $0 (10 robotic voices, up to 1.5x speed) · Premium $29/month (1,000+ natural voices, 60+ languages, up to 5x; annual billing is cheaper). Speechify Studio and the API have their own pricing tiers. Source: speechify.com/pricing.

Sources: speechify.com · speechify.com · speechify.com

Otter.ai

Transcribes meetings and conversations live, summarizes them and pulls out action items — the classic among AI notetakers.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Having meetings written up when you need verbatim transcripts — not just a summary.

For it

  • Longest on the market, and correspondingly robust with Zoom/Teams/Meet
  • Free plan with 300 minutes/month — enough to test with
  • Live transcript during the conversation, not only afterwards

Against it

  • Under price pressure: Granola ($14) and Fireflies ($18) offer more for the money, Otter Business costs $30/user/month
  • The annual-payment discount is enormous (Pro $16.99 → $8.33) — pay monthly and you pay double
  • Transcription quality for German and for accents is weaker than with the newer competitors

Pricing: Basic $0 (300 transcription minutes/month). Pro $16.99/user/month, $8.33/user/month annually (1,200 minutes/month). Business $30/user/month, $19.99/user/month annually (unlimited meeting transcription, 6,000 import minutes/user/month). Enterprise on request. (Source: official pricing page otter.ai/pricing)

Sources: otter.ai · otter.ai · app.impact.com

Granola

An AI notepad for meetings that isn't a bot: it listens through the system microphone while you type yourself, and turns both into clean notes afterwards.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Meetings where a visible recording bot would be awkward — client conversations, first contacts, anything confidential.

For it

  • No bot that shows up in the call and asks for recording permission — that noticeably changes the atmosphere of the conversation
  • Combines your own keywords with the transcript instead of just minuting: you stay the author of the note
  • At $14/user/month, Business is the cheapest serious plan in the meeting category
  • Free plan usable indefinitely (with limited history)

Against it

  • No annual discount — $14 stays $14, however you pay
  • The free plan caps history (aggregators cite 25 notes) — useless as an archive, you're pushed to upgrade
  • Listening in without a visible bot is legally risky: in Germany, secretly recording non-public spoken words is a criminal offense (§ 201 StGB). Get consent — that belongs as a warning in every text about it
  • Distinctly US-/Mac-heavy; small company

Pricing: Basic $0 (AI notes, limited meeting history, chat, shared folders, templates, opt-out from model training). Business $14/user/month (unlimited history, better models, integrations with Notion/Slack/HubSpot/Zapier/Attio/Affinity, MCP, API). Enterprise $35/user/month (SSO, admin controls, org-wide auto-deletion). No annual discount. (Source: official pricing page granola.ai/pricing)

Sources: granola.ai · partners.dub.co · docs.granola.ai

Fireflies.ai Advertising *

Meeting assistant that joins the call as a bot, transcribes, summarizes, and pushes the results into your CRM.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Teams with a lot of calls that want meeting notes automatically in HubSpot/Salesforce & co.

For it

  • Unlimited transcription on ALL plans, including the free one — the cap is on storage and AI credits, not on the note-taking itself
  • Pro at $10/seat billed annually — the cheapest serious plan in the meeting category
  • Strong CRM and tool integrations — the actual reason companies buy it

Against it

  • The bot is visible in the call — the opposite of Granola's approach, and awkward in sensitive conversations
  • AI credits are tight (20 on Free and Pro, 30 on Business) — the real cap, and you only notice it once you're using it
  • The drop from $18 to $10 on annual billing is so steep that monthly billing almost never pays off

Pricing: Free $0 (unlimited transcription, 20 AI credits/month, 400 storage minutes for the team). Pro $18/seat/month, $10/seat/month billed annually (20 credits, 8,000 storage minutes/seat). Business $29/seat/month, $19/seat/month billed annually (30 credits, unlimited storage). Enterprise $39/seat/month, annual only (50 credits, SSO, SCIM, audit logs). (Source: official pricing page fireflies.ai/pricing)

Sources: fireflies.ai · fireflies.ai

Descript

Edit video by editing the transcript — delete a word in the text and it's out of the video. Plus Studio Sound, filler-word removal, Eye Contact, voice cloning and the AI co-editor "Underlord".

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Podcast/interview/talking head, when you want a clean cut fast and without fiddling around in a timeline.

For it

  • Text-based editing is a genuine workflow leap for talking head, interview, podcast
  • Studio Sound rescues mediocre audio surprisingly far
  • Filler words and pauses gone in one click
  • Translation/dubbing in 30+ languages (Business plan)

Against it

  • No substitute for an NLE on narrative work — no serious color grading, no node grading
  • Media hours AND AI credits are capped separately; you run into both limits
  • Gets noticeably sluggish on long projects

Pricing: Free $0 (60 min/month, 720p, 100 one-time AI credits) · Hobbyist $24/month ($16 annually) · Creator $35/month ($24 annually, 30 h/month, Underlord) · Business $65/month ($50 annually, 40 h, Dubbing) · Enterprise on request. Source: https://www.descript.com/pricing

Sources: descript.com · descript.com · descript.com · help.descript.com

HeyGen

AI avatars, voice cloning and video translation with lip sync — including a digital twin of yourself.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

Getting one video into twelve languages without shooting twelve times — and explainer/marketing content without a camera.

For it

  • Best lip sync on translations — the video looks like you spoke the language yourself
  • Your own digital twin from a few minutes of material
  • 175+ languages, API available
  • Free tier (3 videos/month) for testing

Against it

  • Avatars still look synthetic on close inspection — useless for narrative cinema
  • Credit system is opaque: 3–20 credits per minute depending on the avatar engine
  • Pro plan scales steeply (up to $4,300/month)

Pricing: Free $0 (3 videos/month, max. 1 min) · Creator $29/month ($24 billed annually, 600 credits) · Pro from $49/month · Business $149/month + $20/seat · Enterprise on request. Source: https://www.heygen.com/pricing

Sources: heygen.com · heygen.com · heygen.getrewardful.com · uppromote.com

Riverside

Studio-quality remote recording (every track is recorded locally, not over the connection) plus AI editing and "Magic Clips", which turn the recording straight into shorts.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Recording interviews and podcasts remotely without dying on audio quality — and pulling shorts straight out of them.

For it

  • Best remote interview recording on the market — up to 4K locally, no Zoom mush
  • Magic Clips cuts shorts straight out of the recording, no tool switch
  • Text-based editing integrated

Against it

  • The editing is an add-on — no NLE, just tidying up
  • The $200 payout threshold is the highest on this list
  • Magic Clips only usable in any meaningful way from the Pro plan up

Pricing: Free tier available (Magic Clips limited) · Pro $29/month (includes Magic Clips). Source: https://riverside.com/pricing (figure confirmed through third-party sources) — double-check yourself before publishing

Sources: riverside.com · riverside.com · support.riverside.com · rewardful.com

Wispr Flow Advertising *

Dictation tool: you speak, it types cleanly formatted text into ANY field — system-wide, with AI cleanup (fillers removed, self-corrections applied).

  • Free tier
Details

Writing by voice instead of typing — emails, notes, chats, prompts — everywhere in your system. Speaking is much faster than typing.

For it

  • System-wide in every app, not just the browser
  • AI cleans up stumbles/fillers and formats automatically
  • Many languages (100+ per the provider), even mixed in one sentence
  • Mac, Windows and iOS

Against it

  • Continuous, unlimited use requires the subscription
  • Cloud processing — your dictation leaves the device (consider for sensitive content)
  • Requires an install (not a pure web tool)

Pricing: Free tier with a monthly word quota · Pro subscription for unlimited dictation. Exact amounts from the provider (as of July 2026: see wisprflow.ai/pricing).

Sources: wisprflow.ai · wisprflow.ai

Kits.AI

Voice conversion and singing models for musicians: turn your own vocal take into another (licensed) voice.

  • Free tier
Details

Music production — demo vocals, harmonies, vocal doubles, without booking a singer.

For it

  • Voices are ETHICALLY licensed and bought directly from the artists; artists get a revenue share
  • Clear niche focus (singing, not speech)
  • Stem splitter and mastering tools on board as well
  • Cheap entry point

Against it

  • License/commercial terms are NOT stated on the pricing page — you have to read the terms or ask (ugly for a rights-sensitive tool)
  • Download minutes are capped (the conversions are not)
  • Niche — low search volume

Pricing: Free $0 (15 conversion minutes, 0 download minutes) · Starter $10/month (15 download minutes, 2 voice slots) · Producer $30/month (60 download minutes, unlimited slots) · Professional $60/month (unlimited downloads). Source: kits.ai/pricing (as of July 2026).

Sources: kits.ai · kits.ai

PlayHT / PlayAI — EINGESTELLT

Formerly well-known text-to-speech and voice cloning service; acquired by Meta and shut down.

  • Paid only
Details

Nothing anymore — the service no longer exists. Include only as a warning.

For it

  • Historically: good voice quality and a strong API, used by teams at Amazon/IBM/Salesforce

Against it

  • DEAD. Meta took on the team (approx. 35 people) in July 2025 (acquihire into Superintelligence Labs); the API was shut down on 26.07.2025, the platform on 31.12.2025
  • Accounts, voice clones, and stored audio were deleted — no export, no migration path
  • Subscriptions were, according to user reports, mostly terminated without pro-rata refunds
  • The domain play.ht no longer resolves (technically verified)

Pricing: n/a — service discontinued.

Sources: techcrunch.com · theplanettools.ai · cooley.com

Resemble AI

Voice cloning and speech platform for developers, including deepfake detection.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

Developer integrations and projects that want to bill by usage instead of a subscription.

For it

  • Pay-per-use instead of a rigid subscription — fair with fluctuating usage
  • Strong API, real-time speech conversion
  • Also offers deepfake detection (an interesting counterweight within its own portfolio)
  • Multilingual, cross-language cloning

Against it

  • Pricing model hard to grasp for non-developers
  • Pricing figures only verifiable through third-party sources
  • Voice quality behind ElevenLabs in everyday comparison

Pricing: According to a third-party source (checkthat.ai, 2026): Flex plan by usage, approx. $0.0005 per second of synthesis; voice clones $2/month (Rapid, from a 10-second sample) or $5/month (Professional, 10–25+ minutes of material); team seats $20/month. NOT confirmed by Resemble itself — the official pricing page (resemble.ai/pricing) was not reachable. Check before publishing.

Sources: resemble.ai · checkthat.ai

Respeecher

Professional speech-to-speech conversion for film, TV and games — one actor's voice becomes the voice of another character.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

The most professional tool on the list.

For it

  • Used by real studios — Lucasfilm, Blumhouse, Sony; Emmy, Webby and Clio awarded
  • Clear ethics framework: explicit consent from voice owners is mandatory; no voices of private individuals or actors without consent
  • Voice Marketplace makes licensed voices accessible to small productions too
  • Speech-to-speech preserves the acting performance (emphasis, timing) — unlike pure text-to-speech

Against it

  • Considerably more expensive than the consumer tools (Power plan $250/month according to a third-party source)
  • Pricing figures not officially verifiable
  • Higher barrier to entry, not a toy

Pricing: According to a third-party source (dailyaitools.io, 2026): TTS-only $9/month · Explorer $29/month · Creator $45/month · Power $250/month; API and real-time conversion on request. Marketplace with a 3-day free trial. NOT confirmed by Respeecher itself — check before publishing.

Sources: respeecher.com · respeecher.com · dailyaitools.io

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

Write & chat

The models you talk to.

★ My pick Anthropic Claude — Beste Textqualität und der mit Abstand stärkste Coding-Agent — wenn du dir nur EINE KI einrichtest, dann diese.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

19 tools

Anthropic Claude

The model provider developers and writers most often choose when text quality and long, reliable work on code matter more than price.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

Coding, agents, long documents, anything where text quality counts

For it

  • Strongest model family for coding and agents (Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5); Claude Code is included in the Pro subscription
  • 1M token context on Opus 4.8, Opus 4.7/4.6, Sonnet 5 and 4.6 — at the normal token price, no surcharge
  • Prompt caching: a cache hit costs 10% of the input price; the Batch API halves everything
  • Sonnet 5 runs at the introductory price of $2/$10 instead of $3/$15 until 08/31/2026

Against it

  • Hidden price increase: Opus 4.7+, Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 use a new tokenizer that produces ~30% more tokens for the same text (officially documented). So the list price is not the effective price
  • Considerably more expensive than DeepSeek/Qwen for simple tasks
  • Fast Mode (Opus 4.8) doubles the price to $10/$50

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input/output): Claude Opus 4.8 $5/$25 · Claude Sonnet 5 $2/$10 (introductory price until 08/31/2026, then $3/$15) · Claude Haiku 4.5 $1/$5 · Claude Fable 5 $10/$50 · Claude Mythos 5 $10/$50 (limited availability). Cache hits = 0.1×, batch = −50%. Web search $10/1,000 searches. — Subscriptions: Free $0 · Pro $20/month ($17 billed annually) · Max from $100/month · Team $25/seat ($20 annually), premium seat $125 ($100 annually) · Enterprise on request. Source: platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing + claude.com/pricing

Sources: platform.claude.com · claude.com · anthropic.com

Poe (Quora)

Chat interface that makes thousands of AI models and bots accessible under one subscription — LLMs, image and video models via a shared points system.

  • Free tier
Details

One subscription to test all the major chat models side by side without paying for five subscriptions.

For it

  • One subscription for GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.5, Veo, Sora, and thousands of other bots
  • Very fine-grained pricing tiers — entry from $4.17/month (annual billing)
  • Build and publish your own bots; bot creators can earn a share
  • Group chats with several models at once

Against it

  • Compute points are hard to keep track of — you don't know in advance how far you'll get
  • Second choice for media production: it's a chat interface, not a production tool
  • No visible free tier on the plan page

Pricing: Per poe.com/subscription_plans (annual billing, 17% savings): Basic $4.17/month (10,000 points) · Standard $16.67/month (660,000 points) · Professional $41.67/month (1.65M) · Business $83.33/month (3.3M) · Enterprise $208.33/month (8.25M). Monthly billing is more expensive (third-party sources cite, among others, $19.99 for the Standard tier). Different models consume different amounts of points per message.

Sources: poe.com · poe.com · costbench.com

OpenAI (ChatGPT / GPT-API)

The best-known provider — largest user base, broadest ecosystem, and the name everyone searching for "AI" already knows.

  • Free tier
  • no sign-up
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

All-rounder, largest user base, cheapest entry point (Go $8)

For it

  • Widest reach and the broadest tool ecosystem; for many people the entry point into AI at all
  • Clear price ladder from gpt-5.4-nano ($0.20) to gpt-5.6-sol ($5) — a price point for every task
  • Cached input costs only 10% ($0.50 instead of $5 on Sol); Batch and Flex −50%
  • Cheap entry for users: "Go" plan at $8/month

Against it

  • The free plan now shows ads (per the pricing page, also in the $8 Go plan in the US) — for privacy-conscious readers, an argument against
  • Confusing model names (Sol/Terra/Luna alongside 5.5, 5.4, mini, nano, pro) — hard to explain
  • Priority processing doubles the price

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input / cached input / output): gpt-5.6-sol $5 / $0.50 / $30 · gpt-5.6-terra $2.50 / $0.25 / $15 · gpt-5.6-luna $1 / $0.10 / $6 · gpt-5.5 $5 / $0.50 / $30 · gpt-5.4 $2.50 / $0.25 / $15 · gpt-5.4-mini $0.75 / $0.075 / $4.50 · gpt-5.4-nano $0.20 / $0.02 / $1.25. Batch and Flex −50%, Priority +100%. Source: developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing. — Subscriptions (per chatgpt.com/pricing, via search results; the page blocks automated retrieval): Free $0 (with ads) · Go $8 · Plus $20 · Pro $100 · Pro $200 · Business $25/seat ($20 annual) · Enterprise on request.

Sources: developers.openai.com · chatgpt.com · channeldive.com

Google Gemini

Google's model family — the cheapest usable models on the market and the largest free allowance for trying things out.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

Cheapest API, biggest free tier, Office integration

For it

  • A genuine free API tier via Google AI Studio (on nearly all models) — unbeatable for learning and prototyping
  • Flash-Lite from $0.25 input: by far the cheapest tier among the Western providers
  • Deeply integrated into Workspace (Docs, Gmail, Sheets) — the smallest switch for non-technical users
  • Batch and Flex −50%; very strong multimodality (image, video, audio in the same model)

Against it

  • Price jump on long prompts: Gemini 3.1 Pro costs double above 200k tokens ($4/$18 instead of $2/$12)
  • Model naming changes fast (2.5 / 3 / 3.1 / 3.5 all side by side)

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input/output), paid tier: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $2/$12 (≤200k tokens), $4/$18 (>200k) — no free tier · Gemini 3.5 Flash $1.50/$9 · Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite $0.25/$1.50 · Gemini 2.5 Pro $1.25/$10 (≤200k), $2.50/$15 (>200k) · Gemini 2.5 Flash $0.30/$2.50 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite $0.10/$0.40. Batch/Flex −50%. Free tier on all except 3.1 Pro Preview. Source: ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing (as of 09.07.2026). — Subscriptions: Google AI Plus $7.99 · AI Pro $19.99 · AI Ultra $100 (new developer tier) or $200 (top tier, down from $250); announced at I/O 2026.

Sources: ai.google.dev · gemini.google · workspace.google.com · workspace.google.com

xAI Grok

Elon Musk's model family — technically competitive, very large context, and by far the cheapest frontier output ($6 per million output tokens with Grok 4.5).

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Output-heavy tasks at a low price, very large context

For it

  • Grok 4.5 costs only $6 per million output tokens — Opus 4.8 costs $25, GPT-5.6-sol $30. For output-heavy tasks a huge price advantage
  • 1M tokens of context with Grok 4.3 / 4.20; 500k with Grok 4.5
  • 75% cache discount on input ($0.50 instead of $2 with Grok 4.5, per third-party sources)
  • Its own code model (grok-build-0.1, $1/$2, 256k context)

Against it

  • The official pricing/subscription page (x.ai/pricing) blocks automated retrieval → subscription prices can only be sourced third-hand, and are correspondingly uncertain
  • Smaller tool ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic/Google

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input/output), source docs.x.ai/docs/models: grok-4.5 $2/$6 (500k context) · grok-4.3 $1.25/$2.50 (1M) · grok-4.20-0309 (reasoning / non-reasoning / multi-agent) $1.25/$2.50 each (1M) · grok-build-0.1 $1/$2 (256k context, code). Knowledge cutoff Grok 4.5: 01.02.2026. — SUBSCRIPTION PRICES: not substantiated first-hand. x.ai/pricing returns no machine-readable result. Third-party sources consistently state: X Premium $8 · SuperGrok Lite $10 · SuperGrok $30 · X Premium+ $40 · SuperGrok Heavy $300 · Grok Business $30/seat — verify on x.ai/pricing before publishing. Also only third-party sourced: up to $175/month in free API credit via a data-sharing program.

Sources: docs.x.ai · x.ai · felloai.com

Perplexity

  • Free tier
  • no sign-up
  • commercial from paid tier
  • German
Details

For it

  • Answers with footnotes/sources — more honest for research than a pure chatbot
  • The Comet browser and Comet Plus (publisher content in the answers) as differentiators
  • Its own APIs (Sonar, Search, Agentic Research) for developers

Against it

  • Free plan heavily limited (per third-party sources, 5 advanced queries/day)
  • Max at $200/month is very expensive
  • The former Comet referral program ($20/referral) ended on 2025-11-06 — but is still doing the rounds in many blogs. Don't point to it

Pricing: Free $0 (per third-party sources, limited to 5 advanced queries/day) · Pro $20/month or $200/year · Max $200/month or $2,000/year · Education Pro $10/month (verified students) · Enterprise Pro $40/seat/month · Enterprise Max $325/seat/month · Comet Plus $5/month as an add-on (included in Pro and Max). Plus the Sonar/Search/Agentic Research APIs. — Note: Perplexity does not publish a readily machine-readable pricing page; the subscription prices are consistently documented across several third-party sources, with Pro ($20) and Max ($200) considered confirmed.

Sources: perplexity.ai · partners.dub.co · perplexity.ai · taprefer.com

Monica AI Advertising *

  • Free tier
  • German
Details

For it

  • Free to join, runs through Tapfiliate (established platform)
  • The product itself converts well: browser extension, low barrier to entry, broad target audience

Against it

  • Paid advertising has been STRICTLY prohibited since 05/01/2025 — no keyword bidding, no direct linking from ads. If you're planning Google Ads, you're out here
  • $100 payout threshold — with small traffic, the first payout takes a while
  • Content-wise just a layer on top of other people's models; no technology of its own

Pricing: Free tier plus paid subscriptions (check prices on the official site — at monica.im/pricing; not cleanly readable, so deliberately left unsourced here).

Sources: monica.im · monica.im

Merlin AI

  • Free tier
  • German
Details

For it

  • Runs through Tapfiliate; free to join
  • Product with a broad audience (research, writing, summarizing directly on any website)
  • Low entry price for the subscription → easier to sell than a $200 Max tier

Against it

  • Cookie duration contradictory: third-party sources say 90 days in some places, 60 in others — check in the Tapfiliate portal before publication
  • $100 payout threshold
  • Like all wrappers: no model of its own, dependent on the labs whose prices it passes through

Pricing: Free tier plus paid subscriptions. $100 (annual plan) — that gives the entry price. Check exact tiers at getmerlin.in/pricing (page not machine-readable).

Sources: getmerlin.in · merlin.tapfiliate.com · aiaffiliateprograms.ai · taprefer.com

Sider AI Advertising *

  • Free tier
  • German
Details

For it

  • Payout threshold only $10 — the first real payout comes fast, good for starting out
  • NO website required to be accepted (manual approval, but a low bar) — the easiest entry point there is
  • Runs through Impact — an established, reputable network with good reporting
  • Up to $45 per referred subscription; creative assets (banners, text links, deep linking) are provided

Against it

  • Brand PPC bidding is prohibited
  • Product prices not properly verifiable

Pricing: Free tier plus paid subscriptions — check prices at sider.ai (the site blocks automated retrieval, deliberately left unverified here).

Sources: sider.ai · affiliateotter.com · involve.asia

Notion AI

Notes, database and wiki workspace where the AI now works alongside you as an agent — writes, fills databases, searches connected apps and transcribes meetings.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

The one tool where projects, notes and databases converge — and the AI works directly on that own knowledge instead of the open web.

For it

  • The AI sits ON your own data (pages, databases, connected apps) — no copy-paste into a separate chat window
  • Notion Agent handles multi-step tasks instead of just generating text; AI Meeting Notes transcribes and summarizes
  • Enterprise Search also searches connected services, not just Notion itself
  • Enterprise tier with Zero Data Retention at the LLM providers

Against it

  • As of 2025/26 the AI is effectively tied to the Business tier — Free and Plus only get a trial version. That's a noticeable price increase through the back door
  • Custom Agents cost credits ON TOP ($10 per 1,000/month, no rollover into the following month) — the bill is no longer predictable
  • Price is per member: a 5-person team on Business hits three figures a month fast

Pricing: Free $0. Plus $10/member/month (base price on the official pricing page; secondary sources quote $12 for monthly billing). Business $20/member/month ($24 monthly according to secondary sources) — this is where the full Notion Agent, AI Meeting Notes and Enterprise Search sit. Enterprise on request. Custom Agents metered on top: $10 per 1,000 Notion credits per month, no rollover (source: official pricing page).

Sources: notion.com · notion.com

Wispr Flow Advertising *

Dictation tool: you speak, it types cleanly formatted text into ANY field — system-wide, with AI cleanup (fillers removed, self-corrections applied).

  • Free tier
Details

Writing by voice instead of typing — emails, notes, chats, prompts — everywhere in your system. Speaking is much faster than typing.

For it

  • System-wide in every app, not just the browser
  • AI cleans up stumbles/fillers and formats automatically
  • Many languages (100+ per the provider), even mixed in one sentence
  • Mac, Windows and iOS

Against it

  • Continuous, unlimited use requires the subscription
  • Cloud processing — your dictation leaves the device (consider for sensitive content)
  • Requires an install (not a pure web tool)

Pricing: Free tier with a monthly word quota · Pro subscription for unlimited dictation. Exact amounts from the provider (as of July 2026: see wisprflow.ai/pricing).

Sources: wisprflow.ai · wisprflow.ai

DeepSeek

Chinese lab that delivers near-frontier quality at a fraction of Western prices — and publishes the weights.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • local
Details

Bulk processing, cost optimization, self-hosting

For it

  • By far the cheapest usable API: V4 Flash $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens — a factor of 20–100 cheaper than the top models
  • Cache hits cost almost nothing ($0.0028 per 1M) — practically free with repeated system prompts
  • 1M tokens of context on both V4 models; V4 Pro up to 384k tokens of output
  • Open weights → self-hostable, no vendor lock-in

Against it

  • Privacy/location: servers in China. For a German site with GDPR standards, that is something you have to tell the reader — not hide
  • deepseek-chat and deepseek-reasoner will be shut down on July 24, 2026 → anyone using the old model names has to migrate
  • Ecosystem/tooling thinner than at the big providers

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input cache hit / input cache miss / output), source api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing: deepseek-v4-flash $0.0028 / $0.14 / $0.28 · deepseek-v4-pro $0.003625 / $0.435 / $0.87. Context 1,048,576 tokens each. Old models deepseek-chat and deepseek-reasoner: deprecated as of July 24, 2026. Chat app: free.

Sources: api-docs.deepseek.com · openrouter.ai · openrouter.ai

Mistral AI

The European provider — models out of France, GDPR-friendly, with very cheap small models and its own consumer product (Vibe).

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • EU
  • local
Details

EU/GDPR projects, cheap small models, code

For it

  • EU provider → the simplest data protection argument for German projects (no US CLOUD Act, no China question)
  • Mistral Large 3 at $0.50/1.50 is strikingly cheap for a flagship
  • Very broad range: tiny Ministral models ($0.10), code (Codestral, Devstral 2), reasoning (Magistral), OCR, TTS
  • Open weights on several models; cached input −90%, batch −50%

Against it

  • Usually behind Anthropic/OpenAI/Google in benchmarks — the strength is price and location, not peak performance
  • Smaller ecosystem, fewer integrations
  • Product names keep changing (Le Chat → Vibe) — confusing for readers

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input/output), source mistral.ai/pricing/api: Mistral Medium 3.5 $1.50/7.50 · Mistral Large 3 $0.50/1.50 · Mistral Small 4 $0.15/0.60 · Ministral 3-3B $0.10/0.10 · Ministral 3-8B $0.15/0.15 · Ministral 3-14B $0.20/0.20 · Codestral $0.30/0.90 · Devstral 2 $0.40/2 · Magistral Medium $2/5 · Magistral Small $0.50/1.50 · Mistral Embed $0.10 (input only). OCR 4: $4 / 1,000 pages (Document AI $5). Voxtral TTS $0.016 / 1,000 characters; transcription $0.003 / audio minute. Batch −50%, cached input −90%. — Subscriptions (Vibe): Free $0 · Pro $14.99 · Team $24.99/user · Education $5.99 (verified students) · Enterprise on request.

Sources: mistral.ai · mistral.ai

Raycast (Pro / Advanced AI) Advertising *

Keyboard launcher that drives the machine — apps, windows, snippets, scripts — and pulls the AI right into that command field instead of a browser tab.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Anyone who sits at the keyboard all day and wants the AI where they already work — one shortcut away, no context switch.

For it

  • The AI is always one key combination away, not a window and tab switch — the day-to-day difference is bigger than it sounds
  • Huge extension store; the thing grows with what you do
  • Free version fully usable with no time limit (AI capped at 50 messages there)
  • Now available for Windows too, no longer macOS only

Against it

  • The good models cost double: Pro ($8–10) plus the Advanced AI add-on (+$8) — you end up at ~$16–18/month
  • Learning curve: anyone not keyboard-inclined uses 5% of it

Pricing: Free $0 (permanent, incl. 50 AI messages). Pro $10/month or $8/month with annual billing (20% discount). Advanced AI add-on: +$8/month on top — only bookable as an add-on to the paid Pro plan, unlocks the top models. Team Free $0/user, Team Pro $15/user/month or $12 annually (+$8 for Advanced AI). Enterprise on request. (Source: official pricing page raycast.com/pricing)

Sources: raycast.com · raycast.com · affiliates.raycast.com · manual.raycast.com

OpenRouter

A single API endpoint for over 400 language models from 70+ providers — you switch models without changing your code.

  • Free tier
Details

Comparing and switching language models without maintaining a separate account and key for every provider.

For it

  • 400+ models, 70+ providers via one OpenAI-compatible API (their own claim on the homepage)
  • NO markup on inference — you pay the provider price (official FAQ)
  • Automatic failover to other providers during outages → better availability
  • No subscription needed, credit-based model

Against it

  • Language models only — for image/video/audio it's the wrong place
  • Top-up fee: 5.5% (min. $0.80) via Stripe, 5% via crypto
  • BYOK (your own provider key) costs 5% of list price after 1M requests/month

Pricing: No subscription. Inference at provider price, explicitly with no markup (official FAQ). Fees: top-up via Stripe 5.5% (minimum $0.80), via crypto/Coinbase 5%. BYOK: first 1M requests/month free, then 5% of what the model would cost at OpenRouter.

Sources: openrouter.ai · openrouter.ai

Together AI

Inference and training platform for open models (Llama, DeepSeek, Qwen & co.) — serverless per token or as rented GPU clusters.

  • Free tier
Details

Running or fine-tuning open-weight language models in production when you want neither OpenAI nor Anthropic.

For it

  • Very broad: chat, vision, embeddings, image, video, transcription, fine-tuning, GPU clusters
  • Cheap at volume with open-weight models
  • Dedicated endpoints and real GPU clusters (not just an API)
  • Generous startup program: up to $50,000 in credits via the Startup Accelerator

Against it

  • Focused on text/open-weight — for media AI, fal is the better address
  • The pricing structure is complex (tokens, GPU hours, fine-tuning tokens, storage all separate)

Pricing: Serverless per token: $0.0015–4.50 per million tokens depending on model. Images $0.0006–0.134/image. Video $0.14–3.20/video. Transcription from $0.0015/minute. Dedicated endpoints: H100 $5.49/h, B200 $8.99/h. GPU clusters on-demand $3.99–8.19/GPU/h, reserved $3.09–7.99. Fine-tuning $0.48–8.00 per million tokens (minimum $4/job). Storage $0.16/GiB/month. Free tier available to get started.

Sources: together.ai · together.ai

Qwen (Alibaba)

Alibaba's model family — open weights, extremely popular in the open scene, plus paid cloud access via Alibaba Model Studio.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • local
Details

Open weights, your own fine-tuning, cost optimization

For it

  • Open weights in many sizes — the most-used base for custom fine-tuning (alongside Llama)
  • Considerably cheaper than Western providers; via the China endpoint (Beijing) another 60–70% cheaper than via Singapore
  • Chat app free to use
  • Very active open source community

Against it

  • Prices hard to verify cleanly: Alibaba Model Studio quotes different rates depending on endpoint (Singapore/Beijing) and promotion — deliberately marked here as partly unverified
  • Data protection/location China — the same issue as with DeepSeek
  • Practically irrelevant for non-technical users; this is a developer and self-hoster topic

Pricing: PARTLY UNVERIFIED — the official page (alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/model-pricing) could not be cleanly read, all figures below come from third-party sources and are to be checked before publishing: Qwen3-Max approx. $1.20/$6.00 per million tokens via DashScope (batch $0.60/$3.00). Current flagship Qwen3.7-Max allegedly $1.25/$3.75 as a 50% promotional price (list price $2.50/$7.50). All figures for the international endpoint Singapore; the China endpoint (Beijing) is 60–70% cheaper. Open weights: free to download, cost = your own hosting. Chat app: free.

Sources: alibabacloud.com · pricepertoken.com

Meta Llama

Meta's open model family — free to download, the foundation for most of the self-hosting scene.

  • Free
  • commercial ok
  • EU
  • local
Details

Self-hosting, full data control, fine-tuning

For it

  • Weights free — you only pay for hosting, no token fee to Meta
  • Largest ecosystem of tools, fine-tunes and guides among the open models
  • Full data control: runs on your own hardware, nothing leaves the machine
  • Cheap to rent across many providers (Together, Groq, Fireworks, Bedrock, etc.)

Against it

  • The license is NOT OSI open source but Meta's own community license: download, self-hosting and fine-tuning are permitted, commercial use at scale needs legal review. That has to be on the page
  • Self-hosting requires real skill and expensive hardware — not a realistic path for most readers
  • Meta's primary source (llama.com redirects to developer.meta.com/ai) was not machine-readable → current model claim only verifiable via reports

Pricing: Weights: free under Meta's community license (no token fee to Meta). Actual cost = hosting, either your own hardware or an inference provider (Together, Groq, Fireworks, AWS Bedrock …), whose prices vary widely. — MODEL STATUS UNVERIFIED FIRST-HAND: press reports mention Llama 5, released 04/08/2026 (600B parameters, 5M token context). The primary source was not retrievable — verify on llama.com before publication. The reports also contradict each other on the license (community license vs. Apache 2.0); when in doubt write "Meta's community license, not OSI open source".

Sources: llama.com · en.wikipedia.org · aiunpacking.com

TypingMind

Standalone chat interface for your own API keys — you pay once for the software and after that only the tokens to the labs.

  • Paid only
  • EU
Details

Developers with their own API keys who don't want a monthly subscription

For it

  • One-time purchase instead of a subscription — significantly cheaper over time than $20/month if you have API keys anyway
  • Your own keys = the data goes straight to the model provider, no additional middleman
  • All providers in one interface (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google …)

Against it

  • Requires your own API keys → too complicated for non-technical users
  • Small team, small ecosystem

Pricing: One-time purchase model for the software; ongoing costs arise only through your own API keys with the model providers. Check exact prices on typingmind.com (not cleanly readable → deliberately left unsourced here).

Sources: docs.typingmind.com · custom.typingmind.com · lemonsqueezy.com

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

Summarise & research

Make long things short — videos, PDFs, meetings.

★ My pick Anthropic Claude — Beste Textqualität und der mit Abstand stärkste Coding-Agent — wenn du dir nur EINE KI einrichtest, dann diese.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

12 tools

Anthropic Claude

The model provider developers and writers most often choose when text quality and long, reliable work on code matter more than price.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

Coding, agents, long documents, anything where text quality counts

For it

  • Strongest model family for coding and agents (Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5); Claude Code is included in the Pro subscription
  • 1M token context on Opus 4.8, Opus 4.7/4.6, Sonnet 5 and 4.6 — at the normal token price, no surcharge
  • Prompt caching: a cache hit costs 10% of the input price; the Batch API halves everything
  • Sonnet 5 runs at the introductory price of $2/$10 instead of $3/$15 until 08/31/2026

Against it

  • Hidden price increase: Opus 4.7+, Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 use a new tokenizer that produces ~30% more tokens for the same text (officially documented). So the list price is not the effective price
  • Considerably more expensive than DeepSeek/Qwen for simple tasks
  • Fast Mode (Opus 4.8) doubles the price to $10/$50

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input/output): Claude Opus 4.8 $5/$25 · Claude Sonnet 5 $2/$10 (introductory price until 08/31/2026, then $3/$15) · Claude Haiku 4.5 $1/$5 · Claude Fable 5 $10/$50 · Claude Mythos 5 $10/$50 (limited availability). Cache hits = 0.1×, batch = −50%. Web search $10/1,000 searches. — Subscriptions: Free $0 · Pro $20/month ($17 billed annually) · Max from $100/month · Team $25/seat ($20 annually), premium seat $125 ($100 annually) · Enterprise on request. Source: platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing + claude.com/pricing

Sources: platform.claude.com · claude.com · anthropic.com

NotebookLM (Google)

Research assistant that answers exclusively from the sources you upload yourself — with citations pointing to the spot in the document, plus audio and video summaries.

  • Free tier
  • German
Details

Working through a stack of PDFs, transcripts or scripts without the model making things up — every statement is clickable back to the source.

For it

  • Answers only from the uploaded sources and links to the passage — significantly less hallucination than an open chatbot
  • Audio Overview (two AI voices discussing the sources like a podcast) is still the best way to absorb material while driving; plus Video Overviews
  • The free tier is seriously usable: 100 notebooks, 50 sources per notebook, 50 questions a day
  • Deep Research reports in the paid Google AI tiers

Against it

  • No standalone subscription — paid limits only come via the Google AI subscriptions (Plus/Pro/Ultra). You always buy the whole Google package with it
  • Only uses what you upload — not a tool for open research on the web
  • Typically Google: features and limits change fast, data protection questions with company documents

Pricing: Free $0 (100 notebooks, 50 sources per notebook, ~50 questions/day). Paid limits come via the Google AI subscriptions: Google AI Plus $4.99/month, Google AI Pro $19.99/month, Google AI Ultra from $99.99/month (variant with 20× usage $199.99/month) — prices from gemini.google/subscriptions. No separate NotebookLM subscription.

Sources: gemini.google · notebooklm.google · workspace.google.com

OpenAI (ChatGPT / GPT-API)

The best-known provider — largest user base, broadest ecosystem, and the name everyone searching for "AI" already knows.

  • Free tier
  • no sign-up
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

All-rounder, largest user base, cheapest entry point (Go $8)

For it

  • Widest reach and the broadest tool ecosystem; for many people the entry point into AI at all
  • Clear price ladder from gpt-5.4-nano ($0.20) to gpt-5.6-sol ($5) — a price point for every task
  • Cached input costs only 10% ($0.50 instead of $5 on Sol); Batch and Flex −50%
  • Cheap entry for users: "Go" plan at $8/month

Against it

  • The free plan now shows ads (per the pricing page, also in the $8 Go plan in the US) — for privacy-conscious readers, an argument against
  • Confusing model names (Sol/Terra/Luna alongside 5.5, 5.4, mini, nano, pro) — hard to explain
  • Priority processing doubles the price

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input / cached input / output): gpt-5.6-sol $5 / $0.50 / $30 · gpt-5.6-terra $2.50 / $0.25 / $15 · gpt-5.6-luna $1 / $0.10 / $6 · gpt-5.5 $5 / $0.50 / $30 · gpt-5.4 $2.50 / $0.25 / $15 · gpt-5.4-mini $0.75 / $0.075 / $4.50 · gpt-5.4-nano $0.20 / $0.02 / $1.25. Batch and Flex −50%, Priority +100%. Source: developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing. — Subscriptions (per chatgpt.com/pricing, via search results; the page blocks automated retrieval): Free $0 (with ads) · Go $8 · Plus $20 · Pro $100 · Pro $200 · Business $25/seat ($20 annual) · Enterprise on request.

Sources: developers.openai.com · chatgpt.com · channeldive.com

Google Gemini

Google's model family — the cheapest usable models on the market and the largest free allowance for trying things out.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

Cheapest API, biggest free tier, Office integration

For it

  • A genuine free API tier via Google AI Studio (on nearly all models) — unbeatable for learning and prototyping
  • Flash-Lite from $0.25 input: by far the cheapest tier among the Western providers
  • Deeply integrated into Workspace (Docs, Gmail, Sheets) — the smallest switch for non-technical users
  • Batch and Flex −50%; very strong multimodality (image, video, audio in the same model)

Against it

  • Price jump on long prompts: Gemini 3.1 Pro costs double above 200k tokens ($4/$18 instead of $2/$12)
  • Model naming changes fast (2.5 / 3 / 3.1 / 3.5 all side by side)

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input/output), paid tier: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $2/$12 (≤200k tokens), $4/$18 (>200k) — no free tier · Gemini 3.5 Flash $1.50/$9 · Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite $0.25/$1.50 · Gemini 2.5 Pro $1.25/$10 (≤200k), $2.50/$15 (>200k) · Gemini 2.5 Flash $0.30/$2.50 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite $0.10/$0.40. Batch/Flex −50%. Free tier on all except 3.1 Pro Preview. Source: ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing (as of 09.07.2026). — Subscriptions: Google AI Plus $7.99 · AI Pro $19.99 · AI Ultra $100 (new developer tier) or $200 (top tier, down from $250); announced at I/O 2026.

Sources: ai.google.dev · gemini.google · workspace.google.com · workspace.google.com

xAI Grok

Elon Musk's model family — technically competitive, very large context, and by far the cheapest frontier output ($6 per million output tokens with Grok 4.5).

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Output-heavy tasks at a low price, very large context

For it

  • Grok 4.5 costs only $6 per million output tokens — Opus 4.8 costs $25, GPT-5.6-sol $30. For output-heavy tasks a huge price advantage
  • 1M tokens of context with Grok 4.3 / 4.20; 500k with Grok 4.5
  • 75% cache discount on input ($0.50 instead of $2 with Grok 4.5, per third-party sources)
  • Its own code model (grok-build-0.1, $1/$2, 256k context)

Against it

  • The official pricing/subscription page (x.ai/pricing) blocks automated retrieval → subscription prices can only be sourced third-hand, and are correspondingly uncertain
  • Smaller tool ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic/Google

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input/output), source docs.x.ai/docs/models: grok-4.5 $2/$6 (500k context) · grok-4.3 $1.25/$2.50 (1M) · grok-4.20-0309 (reasoning / non-reasoning / multi-agent) $1.25/$2.50 each (1M) · grok-build-0.1 $1/$2 (256k context, code). Knowledge cutoff Grok 4.5: 01.02.2026. — SUBSCRIPTION PRICES: not substantiated first-hand. x.ai/pricing returns no machine-readable result. Third-party sources consistently state: X Premium $8 · SuperGrok Lite $10 · SuperGrok $30 · X Premium+ $40 · SuperGrok Heavy $300 · Grok Business $30/seat — verify on x.ai/pricing before publishing. Also only third-party sourced: up to $175/month in free API credit via a data-sharing program.

Sources: docs.x.ai · x.ai · felloai.com

Perplexity

  • Free tier
  • no sign-up
  • commercial from paid tier
  • German
Details

For it

  • Answers with footnotes/sources — more honest for research than a pure chatbot
  • The Comet browser and Comet Plus (publisher content in the answers) as differentiators
  • Its own APIs (Sonar, Search, Agentic Research) for developers

Against it

  • Free plan heavily limited (per third-party sources, 5 advanced queries/day)
  • Max at $200/month is very expensive
  • The former Comet referral program ($20/referral) ended on 2025-11-06 — but is still doing the rounds in many blogs. Don't point to it

Pricing: Free $0 (per third-party sources, limited to 5 advanced queries/day) · Pro $20/month or $200/year · Max $200/month or $2,000/year · Education Pro $10/month (verified students) · Enterprise Pro $40/seat/month · Enterprise Max $325/seat/month · Comet Plus $5/month as an add-on (included in Pro and Max). Plus the Sonar/Search/Agentic Research APIs. — Note: Perplexity does not publish a readily machine-readable pricing page; the subscription prices are consistently documented across several third-party sources, with Pro ($20) and Max ($200) considered confirmed.

Sources: perplexity.ai · partners.dub.co · perplexity.ai · taprefer.com

Monica AI Advertising *

  • Free tier
  • German
Details

For it

  • Free to join, runs through Tapfiliate (established platform)
  • The product itself converts well: browser extension, low barrier to entry, broad target audience

Against it

  • Paid advertising has been STRICTLY prohibited since 05/01/2025 — no keyword bidding, no direct linking from ads. If you're planning Google Ads, you're out here
  • $100 payout threshold — with small traffic, the first payout takes a while
  • Content-wise just a layer on top of other people's models; no technology of its own

Pricing: Free tier plus paid subscriptions (check prices on the official site — at monica.im/pricing; not cleanly readable, so deliberately left unsourced here).

Sources: monica.im · monica.im

Merlin AI

  • Free tier
  • German
Details

For it

  • Runs through Tapfiliate; free to join
  • Product with a broad audience (research, writing, summarizing directly on any website)
  • Low entry price for the subscription → easier to sell than a $200 Max tier

Against it

  • Cookie duration contradictory: third-party sources say 90 days in some places, 60 in others — check in the Tapfiliate portal before publication
  • $100 payout threshold
  • Like all wrappers: no model of its own, dependent on the labs whose prices it passes through

Pricing: Free tier plus paid subscriptions. $100 (annual plan) — that gives the entry price. Check exact tiers at getmerlin.in/pricing (page not machine-readable).

Sources: getmerlin.in · merlin.tapfiliate.com · aiaffiliateprograms.ai · taprefer.com

Sider AI Advertising *

  • Free tier
  • German
Details

For it

  • Payout threshold only $10 — the first real payout comes fast, good for starting out
  • NO website required to be accepted (manual approval, but a low bar) — the easiest entry point there is
  • Runs through Impact — an established, reputable network with good reporting
  • Up to $45 per referred subscription; creative assets (banners, text links, deep linking) are provided

Against it

  • Brand PPC bidding is prohibited
  • Product prices not properly verifiable

Pricing: Free tier plus paid subscriptions — check prices at sider.ai (the site blocks automated retrieval, deliberately left unverified here).

Sources: sider.ai · affiliateotter.com · involve.asia

Manus

General autonomous AI agent (not just coding): researches, browses, writes code, creates files and delivers finished results.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Tasks that go beyond code — research, analysis, documents, small apps, all in one run.

For it

  • A real general-purpose agent, not just coding
  • Generous free tier: 300 daily credits
  • Up to 20 parallel tasks on paid plans

Against it

  • Credits are gone fast — every action (browsing, running code, analyzing a file) costs
  • Politically unsettled: a Meta acquisition happened and was unwound by China
  • Quality fluctuates on long autonomous runs
  • Data protection/jurisdiction tricky for European users

Pricing: Free $0 (300 daily credits) · Standard $20/month (4,000 credits) · Customizable $40/month (8,000 credits) · Extended $200/month (40,000 credits). All paid plans additionally include 300 daily refresh credits, up to 20 parallel tasks; annual payment approx. 17% cheaper. Team/Enterprise on request. Source: manus.im/pricing — CAUTION: the pricing table is loaded via JavaScript and was not directly retrievable; figures come from the search index of the same page and should be double-checked in the browser before publication.

Sources: manus.im · manus.im · manus.im · techcrunch.com

Notion AI

Notes, database and wiki workspace where the AI now works alongside you as an agent — writes, fills databases, searches connected apps and transcribes meetings.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

The one tool where projects, notes and databases converge — and the AI works directly on that own knowledge instead of the open web.

For it

  • The AI sits ON your own data (pages, databases, connected apps) — no copy-paste into a separate chat window
  • Notion Agent handles multi-step tasks instead of just generating text; AI Meeting Notes transcribes and summarizes
  • Enterprise Search also searches connected services, not just Notion itself
  • Enterprise tier with Zero Data Retention at the LLM providers

Against it

  • As of 2025/26 the AI is effectively tied to the Business tier — Free and Plus only get a trial version. That's a noticeable price increase through the back door
  • Custom Agents cost credits ON TOP ($10 per 1,000/month, no rollover into the following month) — the bill is no longer predictable
  • Price is per member: a 5-person team on Business hits three figures a month fast

Pricing: Free $0. Plus $10/member/month (base price on the official pricing page; secondary sources quote $12 for monthly billing). Business $20/member/month ($24 monthly according to secondary sources) — this is where the full Notion Agent, AI Meeting Notes and Enterprise Search sit. Enterprise on request. Custom Agents metered on top: $10 per 1,000 Notion credits per month, no rollover (source: official pricing page).

Sources: notion.com · notion.com

Copilot for Obsidian (Plugin, Brevilabs)

AI assistant INSIDE the Obsidian vault: chats with your own notes, searches semantically, works agentically — either with your own API keys or on a subscription with a built-in model.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • local
Details

Anyone who wants to query their Obsidian archive ("what did I note about X back then?") — with the option that nothing leaves the machine.

For it

  • Can run with LOCAL models (Ollama, LM Studio) — then the entire vault stays on the device. Notion can't do that by design
  • Free version fully usable with your own API keys from OpenAI/Anthropic/Google — you only pay for what you use
  • Plus reads beyond Markdown: PDFs, EPUBs, 50+ file types alongside the notes
  • Agentic features and web search on the Plus tier

Against it

  • NOT from Obsidian — Brevilabs LLC is a third party. Continuity risk if a one-person project stops
  • Plus at $14.99/month is more expensive than Notion's Plus tier — a bold move for a plugin
  • The self-host tier ($349.99 one-time) only includes 2 years of the Plus subscription; after that either renew or switch to your own API keys

Pricing: Free $0 (LLM chat with YOUR OWN API keys, image support, local vault search — Markdown files only). Plus $14.99/month or $139.99/year (= $11.67/month, 22% cheaper): built-in copilot-plus-flash model, AI agents, web search, chat with PDFs/EPUBs/50+ file types. Self-host/Supporter: one-time $349.99 (lifetime self-host access incl. 2 years of Plus). 14-day refund window. The "Believer" tier has been discontinued. (Source: obsidiancopilot.com/en/pricing)

Sources: obsidiancopilot.com · obsidiancopilot.com · github.com

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

Slides & office

Slides, notes, meetings, spreadsheets.

★ My pick NotebookLM (Google) — Antwortet nur aus den Quellen, die man selbst hochlädt, und verlinkt jede Aussage zurück auf die Fundstelle — gratis, ohne Einarbeitung, und man merkt sofort, wenn etwas nicht im Material steht.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

12 tools

NotebookLM (Google)

Research assistant that answers exclusively from the sources you upload yourself — with citations pointing to the spot in the document, plus audio and video summaries.

  • Free tier
  • German
Details

Working through a stack of PDFs, transcripts or scripts without the model making things up — every statement is clickable back to the source.

For it

  • Answers only from the uploaded sources and links to the passage — significantly less hallucination than an open chatbot
  • Audio Overview (two AI voices discussing the sources like a podcast) is still the best way to absorb material while driving; plus Video Overviews
  • The free tier is seriously usable: 100 notebooks, 50 sources per notebook, 50 questions a day
  • Deep Research reports in the paid Google AI tiers

Against it

  • No standalone subscription — paid limits only come via the Google AI subscriptions (Plus/Pro/Ultra). You always buy the whole Google package with it
  • Only uses what you upload — not a tool for open research on the web
  • Typically Google: features and limits change fast, data protection questions with company documents

Pricing: Free $0 (100 notebooks, 50 sources per notebook, ~50 questions/day). Paid limits come via the Google AI subscriptions: Google AI Plus $4.99/month, Google AI Pro $19.99/month, Google AI Ultra from $99.99/month (variant with 20× usage $199.99/month) — prices from gemini.google/subscriptions. No separate NotebookLM subscription.

Sources: gemini.google · notebooklm.google · workspace.google.com

Google Gemini

Google's model family — the cheapest usable models on the market and the largest free allowance for trying things out.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

Cheapest API, biggest free tier, Office integration

For it

  • A genuine free API tier via Google AI Studio (on nearly all models) — unbeatable for learning and prototyping
  • Flash-Lite from $0.25 input: by far the cheapest tier among the Western providers
  • Deeply integrated into Workspace (Docs, Gmail, Sheets) — the smallest switch for non-technical users
  • Batch and Flex −50%; very strong multimodality (image, video, audio in the same model)

Against it

  • Price jump on long prompts: Gemini 3.1 Pro costs double above 200k tokens ($4/$18 instead of $2/$12)
  • Model naming changes fast (2.5 / 3 / 3.1 / 3.5 all side by side)

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input/output), paid tier: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $2/$12 (≤200k tokens), $4/$18 (>200k) — no free tier · Gemini 3.5 Flash $1.50/$9 · Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite $0.25/$1.50 · Gemini 2.5 Pro $1.25/$10 (≤200k), $2.50/$15 (>200k) · Gemini 2.5 Flash $0.30/$2.50 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite $0.10/$0.40. Batch/Flex −50%. Free tier on all except 3.1 Pro Preview. Source: ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing (as of 09.07.2026). — Subscriptions: Google AI Plus $7.99 · AI Pro $19.99 · AI Ultra $100 (new developer tier) or $200 (top tier, down from $250); announced at I/O 2026.

Sources: ai.google.dev · gemini.google · workspace.google.com · workspace.google.com

Notion AI

Notes, database and wiki workspace where the AI now works alongside you as an agent — writes, fills databases, searches connected apps and transcribes meetings.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

The one tool where projects, notes and databases converge — and the AI works directly on that own knowledge instead of the open web.

For it

  • The AI sits ON your own data (pages, databases, connected apps) — no copy-paste into a separate chat window
  • Notion Agent handles multi-step tasks instead of just generating text; AI Meeting Notes transcribes and summarizes
  • Enterprise Search also searches connected services, not just Notion itself
  • Enterprise tier with Zero Data Retention at the LLM providers

Against it

  • As of 2025/26 the AI is effectively tied to the Business tier — Free and Plus only get a trial version. That's a noticeable price increase through the back door
  • Custom Agents cost credits ON TOP ($10 per 1,000/month, no rollover into the following month) — the bill is no longer predictable
  • Price is per member: a 5-person team on Business hits three figures a month fast

Pricing: Free $0. Plus $10/member/month (base price on the official pricing page; secondary sources quote $12 for monthly billing). Business $20/member/month ($24 monthly according to secondary sources) — this is where the full Notion Agent, AI Meeting Notes and Enterprise Search sit. Enterprise on request. Custom Agents metered on top: $10 per 1,000 Notion credits per month, no rollover (source: official pricing page).

Sources: notion.com · notion.com

Gamma

Turns a prompt or a document into finished presentations, web pages and documents — with image models, and now video models too.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

A presentable deck or a quick one-pager site in twenty minutes, without touching PowerPoint.

For it

  • From idea to a decent-looking deck in minutes; the result is shareable by link (not just as a file)
  • Can also output web pages and documents, not just slides — including custom domains on the higher plans
  • Free plan to try it out; credits instead of a hard cap
  • Clearly the best search volume in the presentation niche — the traffic anchor for an index

Against it

  • The credit system is opaque: image and video models eat different amounts, and you only find out what 4,000 credits actually mean by using them
  • The typical Gamma look is recognizable — often too generic for brands with their own design language
  • Ultra ($100/month) is monthly only, with no annual discount

Pricing: Free $0. Plus $10/month (annual ~$8/month), 1,000 credits/month. Pro $20/month (annual ~$15–18/month depending on source), 4,000 credits/month. Ultra $100/month (monthly only, no annual plan), 20,000 credits/month. ⚠️ The credit amounts are officially verified (help.gamma.app); the dollar figures come from secondary sources because gamma.app/pricing blocks automated requests (HTTP 403). The help center states the annual discount as up to 28%.

Sources: help.gamma.app · gamma-partners-y9y8f3m.gamma.site · help.gamma.app · gamma.app

Beautiful.ai

Presentation tool with "Smart Slides": the slides re-layout themselves as soon as you add content — design rules are built in.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

Company decks that should look designed without anyone knowing design — sales, pitch, report.

For it

  • The auto-layout logic systematically prevents ugly slides — you can barely break the grid
  • Clean for brand guidelines (shared libraries, team templates) on the Team tiers
  • One year free for students with a .edu address
  • Longer on the market and more stable than many AI deck generators

Against it

  • NO free tier anymore — only a 14-day trial, and it requires a credit card that gets charged automatically when it expires. That costs conversions and goodwill
  • Considerably less AI-driven than Gamma: intelligent layout rather than generation from a prompt
  • Team from $40/user/month (annually) is expensive by comparison

Pricing: No free tier, only a 14-day trial with a credit card required. Pro $12/month billed annually or $45 billed monthly. Team (2–20 seats) $40/user/month annually or $50/user/month monthly. Enterprise (20+) on request. Students with a .edu address: 1 year free. (Source: official pricing page beautiful.ai/pricing)

Sources: beautiful.ai · beautiful.ai

Napkin AI

Turns written text into diagrams, charts and visualizations automatically — you write the thought, Napkin suggests the matching image.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Adding visuals to an explanatory text (blog post, concept, pitch) without opening Figma.

For it

  • Solves a real problem: text → visual, without a design tool. Exactly what a blog author needs
  • Free tier with 500 AI credits per week (resets Mondays) is surprisingly generous; PNG and PDF export included
  • Import from PPT, DOC, PDF, HTML, MD — you can throw existing material at it

Against it

  • Free visuals carry Napkin branding; SVG and PPT export only from Plus up
  • The suggestions are cookie-cutter — too inflexible for very idiosyncratic diagram logic
  • Credit system: 500/week free, 10,000/month on Plus — what a visual costs, you only learn by using it

Pricing: Free $0 (500 AI credits/week, unlimited editing and importing, PNG/PDF export, with Napkin branding). Plus $9/person/month, annually $6.75/month (10,000 credits/month, PPT and SVG export, 3 Brand Styles, no branding). Pro $22/person/month, annually $16.50/month (30,000 credits/month, custom fonts, unlimited custom branding, credit top-ups). Enterprise on request. Annual billing saves 25%. (Source: official pricing page napkin.ai/pricing)

Sources: napkin.ai · napkinone.notion.site

Otter.ai

Transcribes meetings and conversations live, summarizes them and pulls out action items — the classic among AI notetakers.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Having meetings written up when you need verbatim transcripts — not just a summary.

For it

  • Longest on the market, and correspondingly robust with Zoom/Teams/Meet
  • Free plan with 300 minutes/month — enough to test with
  • Live transcript during the conversation, not only afterwards

Against it

  • Under price pressure: Granola ($14) and Fireflies ($18) offer more for the money, Otter Business costs $30/user/month
  • The annual-payment discount is enormous (Pro $16.99 → $8.33) — pay monthly and you pay double
  • Transcription quality for German and for accents is weaker than with the newer competitors

Pricing: Basic $0 (300 transcription minutes/month). Pro $16.99/user/month, $8.33/user/month annually (1,200 minutes/month). Business $30/user/month, $19.99/user/month annually (unlimited meeting transcription, 6,000 import minutes/user/month). Enterprise on request. (Source: official pricing page otter.ai/pricing)

Sources: otter.ai · otter.ai · app.impact.com

Granola

An AI notepad for meetings that isn't a bot: it listens through the system microphone while you type yourself, and turns both into clean notes afterwards.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Meetings where a visible recording bot would be awkward — client conversations, first contacts, anything confidential.

For it

  • No bot that shows up in the call and asks for recording permission — that noticeably changes the atmosphere of the conversation
  • Combines your own keywords with the transcript instead of just minuting: you stay the author of the note
  • At $14/user/month, Business is the cheapest serious plan in the meeting category
  • Free plan usable indefinitely (with limited history)

Against it

  • No annual discount — $14 stays $14, however you pay
  • The free plan caps history (aggregators cite 25 notes) — useless as an archive, you're pushed to upgrade
  • Listening in without a visible bot is legally risky: in Germany, secretly recording non-public spoken words is a criminal offense (§ 201 StGB). Get consent — that belongs as a warning in every text about it
  • Distinctly US-/Mac-heavy; small company

Pricing: Basic $0 (AI notes, limited meeting history, chat, shared folders, templates, opt-out from model training). Business $14/user/month (unlimited history, better models, integrations with Notion/Slack/HubSpot/Zapier/Attio/Affinity, MCP, API). Enterprise $35/user/month (SSO, admin controls, org-wide auto-deletion). No annual discount. (Source: official pricing page granola.ai/pricing)

Sources: granola.ai · partners.dub.co · docs.granola.ai

Fireflies.ai Advertising *

Meeting assistant that joins the call as a bot, transcribes, summarizes, and pushes the results into your CRM.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Teams with a lot of calls that want meeting notes automatically in HubSpot/Salesforce & co.

For it

  • Unlimited transcription on ALL plans, including the free one — the cap is on storage and AI credits, not on the note-taking itself
  • Pro at $10/seat billed annually — the cheapest serious plan in the meeting category
  • Strong CRM and tool integrations — the actual reason companies buy it

Against it

  • The bot is visible in the call — the opposite of Granola's approach, and awkward in sensitive conversations
  • AI credits are tight (20 on Free and Pro, 30 on Business) — the real cap, and you only notice it once you're using it
  • The drop from $18 to $10 on annual billing is so steep that monthly billing almost never pays off

Pricing: Free $0 (unlimited transcription, 20 AI credits/month, 400 storage minutes for the team). Pro $18/seat/month, $10/seat/month billed annually (20 credits, 8,000 storage minutes/seat). Business $29/seat/month, $19/seat/month billed annually (30 credits, unlimited storage). Enterprise $39/seat/month, annual only (50 credits, SSO, SCIM, audit logs). (Source: official pricing page fireflies.ai/pricing)

Sources: fireflies.ai · fireflies.ai

Raycast (Pro / Advanced AI) Advertising *

Keyboard launcher that drives the machine — apps, windows, snippets, scripts — and pulls the AI right into that command field instead of a browser tab.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Anyone who sits at the keyboard all day and wants the AI where they already work — one shortcut away, no context switch.

For it

  • The AI is always one key combination away, not a window and tab switch — the day-to-day difference is bigger than it sounds
  • Huge extension store; the thing grows with what you do
  • Free version fully usable with no time limit (AI capped at 50 messages there)
  • Now available for Windows too, no longer macOS only

Against it

  • The good models cost double: Pro ($8–10) plus the Advanced AI add-on (+$8) — you end up at ~$16–18/month
  • Learning curve: anyone not keyboard-inclined uses 5% of it

Pricing: Free $0 (permanent, incl. 50 AI messages). Pro $10/month or $8/month with annual billing (20% discount). Advanced AI add-on: +$8/month on top — only bookable as an add-on to the paid Pro plan, unlocks the top models. Team Free $0/user, Team Pro $15/user/month or $12 annually (+$8 for Advanced AI). Enterprise on request. (Source: official pricing page raycast.com/pricing)

Sources: raycast.com · raycast.com · affiliates.raycast.com · manual.raycast.com

Obsidian

Local note storage made of plain Markdown files on your own hard drive — AI comes in via plugins, not out of the box.

  • Free
  • no sign-up
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
  • local
Details

A knowledge store you actually own and can still read in ten years — files, not a cloud account.

For it

  • The notes are plain Markdown files on your own drive. No vendor can take them away, no pricing model can lock them in
  • Free for personal use — no sign-up, no account
  • AI is your choice via plugins (Copilot, Smart Connections, Text Generator) — including fully local via Ollama/LM Studio, in which case not a word leaves your machine
  • Sync is end-to-end encrypted

Against it

  • AI out of the box: none. You have to install and configure plugins — a considerably higher barrier to entry than Notion
  • The good AI plugins are third-party products with their own subscriptions (see Copilot for Obsidian) — which takes the shine off the "free"
  • Team collaboration is not a strength — Obsidian is a single-player tool

Pricing: Personal use: free, no sign-up. Obsidian Sync $4/month (annual) or $5/month (monthly). Obsidian Publish $8/month (annual) or $10/month (monthly). Commercial license $50/user/year (per the vendor, not mandatory). Catalyst (voluntary support, beta access): $25 one-time. (Source: official pricing page obsidian.md/pricing)

Sources: obsidian.md · forum.obsidian.md

Copilot for Obsidian (Plugin, Brevilabs)

AI assistant INSIDE the Obsidian vault: chats with your own notes, searches semantically, works agentically — either with your own API keys or on a subscription with a built-in model.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • local
Details

Anyone who wants to query their Obsidian archive ("what did I note about X back then?") — with the option that nothing leaves the machine.

For it

  • Can run with LOCAL models (Ollama, LM Studio) — then the entire vault stays on the device. Notion can't do that by design
  • Free version fully usable with your own API keys from OpenAI/Anthropic/Google — you only pay for what you use
  • Plus reads beyond Markdown: PDFs, EPUBs, 50+ file types alongside the notes
  • Agentic features and web search on the Plus tier

Against it

  • NOT from Obsidian — Brevilabs LLC is a third party. Continuity risk if a one-person project stops
  • Plus at $14.99/month is more expensive than Notion's Plus tier — a bold move for a plugin
  • The self-host tier ($349.99 one-time) only includes 2 years of the Plus subscription; after that either renew or switch to your own API keys

Pricing: Free $0 (LLM chat with YOUR OWN API keys, image support, local vault search — Markdown files only). Plus $14.99/month or $139.99/year (= $11.67/month, 22% cheaper): built-in copilot-plus-flash model, AI agents, web search, chat with PDFs/EPUBs/50+ file types. Self-host/Supporter: one-time $349.99 (lifetime self-host access incl. 2 years of Plus). 14-day refund window. The "Believer" tier has been discontinued. (Source: obsidiancopilot.com/en/pricing)

Sources: obsidiancopilot.com · obsidiancopilot.com · github.com

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

Automate & code

Agents that work on their own instead of just answering.

★ My pick Anthropic Claude — Beste Textqualität und der mit Abstand stärkste Coding-Agent — wenn du dir nur EINE KI einrichtest, dann diese.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

20 tools

Anthropic Claude

The model provider developers and writers most often choose when text quality and long, reliable work on code matter more than price.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

Coding, agents, long documents, anything where text quality counts

For it

  • Strongest model family for coding and agents (Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5); Claude Code is included in the Pro subscription
  • 1M token context on Opus 4.8, Opus 4.7/4.6, Sonnet 5 and 4.6 — at the normal token price, no surcharge
  • Prompt caching: a cache hit costs 10% of the input price; the Batch API halves everything
  • Sonnet 5 runs at the introductory price of $2/$10 instead of $3/$15 until 08/31/2026

Against it

  • Hidden price increase: Opus 4.7+, Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 use a new tokenizer that produces ~30% more tokens for the same text (officially documented). So the list price is not the effective price
  • Considerably more expensive than DeepSeek/Qwen for simple tasks
  • Fast Mode (Opus 4.8) doubles the price to $10/$50

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input/output): Claude Opus 4.8 $5/$25 · Claude Sonnet 5 $2/$10 (introductory price until 08/31/2026, then $3/$15) · Claude Haiku 4.5 $1/$5 · Claude Fable 5 $10/$50 · Claude Mythos 5 $10/$50 (limited availability). Cache hits = 0.1×, batch = −50%. Web search $10/1,000 searches. — Subscriptions: Free $0 · Pro $20/month ($17 billed annually) · Max from $100/month · Team $25/seat ($20 annually), premium seat $125 ($100 annually) · Enterprise on request. Source: platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing + claude.com/pricing

Sources: platform.claude.com · claude.com · anthropic.com

Claude Code (Anthropic)

Agentic coding assistant in the terminal (plus IDE and web integration) that independently reads files, edits them, runs tests and commits.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

Serious work on real codebases in the terminal — multi-step refactors, bug fixes, migrations.

For it

  • Very strong on long, multi-step tasks in large repos
  • Terminal-native: fits into existing workflows, no IDE switch needed
  • Included in all paid Claude plans (no separate subscription)
  • MCP ecosystem: can be hooked into your own systems

Against it

  • On the Pro plan ($20) the limits for continuous use are hit fast — realistically you need Max from $100
  • Consumption is hard to predict
  • No free access (the Free plan does not include Claude Code)

Pricing: Free $0 (Claude Code NOT included) · Pro $20/month ($17 billed annually, Claude Code included) · Max from $100/month (5x or 20x Pro usage) · Team seat $25/month ($20 annually) · Premium seat $125 ($100 annually) · Enterprise on request. Source: claude.com/pricing (July 2026).

Sources: claude.com · anthropic.com · anthropic.com · growsurf.com

OpenAI (ChatGPT / GPT-API)

The best-known provider — largest user base, broadest ecosystem, and the name everyone searching for "AI" already knows.

  • Free tier
  • no sign-up
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

All-rounder, largest user base, cheapest entry point (Go $8)

For it

  • Widest reach and the broadest tool ecosystem; for many people the entry point into AI at all
  • Clear price ladder from gpt-5.4-nano ($0.20) to gpt-5.6-sol ($5) — a price point for every task
  • Cached input costs only 10% ($0.50 instead of $5 on Sol); Batch and Flex −50%
  • Cheap entry for users: "Go" plan at $8/month

Against it

  • The free plan now shows ads (per the pricing page, also in the $8 Go plan in the US) — for privacy-conscious readers, an argument against
  • Confusing model names (Sol/Terra/Luna alongside 5.5, 5.4, mini, nano, pro) — hard to explain
  • Priority processing doubles the price

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input / cached input / output): gpt-5.6-sol $5 / $0.50 / $30 · gpt-5.6-terra $2.50 / $0.25 / $15 · gpt-5.6-luna $1 / $0.10 / $6 · gpt-5.5 $5 / $0.50 / $30 · gpt-5.4 $2.50 / $0.25 / $15 · gpt-5.4-mini $0.75 / $0.075 / $4.50 · gpt-5.4-nano $0.20 / $0.02 / $1.25. Batch and Flex −50%, Priority +100%. Source: developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing. — Subscriptions (per chatgpt.com/pricing, via search results; the page blocks automated retrieval): Free $0 (with ads) · Go $8 · Plus $20 · Pro $100 · Pro $200 · Business $25/seat ($20 annual) · Enterprise on request.

Sources: developers.openai.com · chatgpt.com · channeldive.com

Manus

General autonomous AI agent (not just coding): researches, browses, writes code, creates files and delivers finished results.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Tasks that go beyond code — research, analysis, documents, small apps, all in one run.

For it

  • A real general-purpose agent, not just coding
  • Generous free tier: 300 daily credits
  • Up to 20 parallel tasks on paid plans

Against it

  • Credits are gone fast — every action (browsing, running code, analyzing a file) costs
  • Politically unsettled: a Meta acquisition happened and was unwound by China
  • Quality fluctuates on long autonomous runs
  • Data protection/jurisdiction tricky for European users

Pricing: Free $0 (300 daily credits) · Standard $20/month (4,000 credits) · Customizable $40/month (8,000 credits) · Extended $200/month (40,000 credits). All paid plans additionally include 300 daily refresh credits, up to 20 parallel tasks; annual payment approx. 17% cheaper. Team/Enterprise on request. Source: manus.im/pricing — CAUTION: the pricing table is loaded via JavaScript and was not directly retrievable; figures come from the search index of the same page and should be double-checked in the browser before publication.

Sources: manus.im · manus.im · manus.im · techcrunch.com

Emergent

Vibe coding platform: web and mobile apps out of a prompt, hosting included — competitor to Lovable and Replit.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

For it

  • Web AND mobile out of one prompt
  • Pro plan with 1M context window and custom AI agents
  • Enormous growth (over $100M ARR in 8 months) = the audience is looking for it

Against it

  • Free plan with 10 credits/month is really only for trying it out
  • Much less known than Lovable — lower search volume
  • The jump from Standard ($20) to Pro ($200) is brutal, nothing in between
  • Young company, terms can change fast

Pricing: Free $0 (10 credits/month, web and mobile building, extended models) · Standard $20/month ($17 annually, 100 credits, private projects, GitHub integration) · Pro $200/month ($167 annually, 750 credits, 1M context window, "Ultra thinking", custom AI agents) · Business and Enterprise on request. Extra credits per third-party sources $10 for 50 credits (unverified). Source: emergent.sh/pricing (July 2026).

Sources: emergent.sh · app.emergent.sh · techcrunch.com

DeepSeek

Chinese lab that delivers near-frontier quality at a fraction of Western prices — and publishes the weights.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • local
Details

Bulk processing, cost optimization, self-hosting

For it

  • By far the cheapest usable API: V4 Flash $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens — a factor of 20–100 cheaper than the top models
  • Cache hits cost almost nothing ($0.0028 per 1M) — practically free with repeated system prompts
  • 1M tokens of context on both V4 models; V4 Pro up to 384k tokens of output
  • Open weights → self-hostable, no vendor lock-in

Against it

  • Privacy/location: servers in China. For a German site with GDPR standards, that is something you have to tell the reader — not hide
  • deepseek-chat and deepseek-reasoner will be shut down on July 24, 2026 → anyone using the old model names has to migrate
  • Ecosystem/tooling thinner than at the big providers

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input cache hit / input cache miss / output), source api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing: deepseek-v4-flash $0.0028 / $0.14 / $0.28 · deepseek-v4-pro $0.003625 / $0.435 / $0.87. Context 1,048,576 tokens each. Old models deepseek-chat and deepseek-reasoner: deprecated as of July 24, 2026. Chat app: free.

Sources: api-docs.deepseek.com · openrouter.ai · openrouter.ai

Mistral AI

The European provider — models out of France, GDPR-friendly, with very cheap small models and its own consumer product (Vibe).

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • EU
  • local
Details

EU/GDPR projects, cheap small models, code

For it

  • EU provider → the simplest data protection argument for German projects (no US CLOUD Act, no China question)
  • Mistral Large 3 at $0.50/1.50 is strikingly cheap for a flagship
  • Very broad range: tiny Ministral models ($0.10), code (Codestral, Devstral 2), reasoning (Magistral), OCR, TTS
  • Open weights on several models; cached input −90%, batch −50%

Against it

  • Usually behind Anthropic/OpenAI/Google in benchmarks — the strength is price and location, not peak performance
  • Smaller ecosystem, fewer integrations
  • Product names keep changing (Le Chat → Vibe) — confusing for readers

Pricing: API per 1M tokens (input/output), source mistral.ai/pricing/api: Mistral Medium 3.5 $1.50/7.50 · Mistral Large 3 $0.50/1.50 · Mistral Small 4 $0.15/0.60 · Ministral 3-3B $0.10/0.10 · Ministral 3-8B $0.15/0.15 · Ministral 3-14B $0.20/0.20 · Codestral $0.30/0.90 · Devstral 2 $0.40/2 · Magistral Medium $2/5 · Magistral Small $0.50/1.50 · Mistral Embed $0.10 (input only). OCR 4: $4 / 1,000 pages (Document AI $5). Voxtral TTS $0.016 / 1,000 characters; transcription $0.003 / audio minute. Batch −50%, cached input −90%. — Subscriptions (Vibe): Free $0 · Pro $14.99 · Team $24.99/user · Education $5.99 (verified students) · Enterprise on request.

Sources: mistral.ai · mistral.ai

Cursor

AI IDE (VS Code fork) with tab autocomplete and an agent that works autonomously across multiple files.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Anyone who wants a real IDE instead of a terminal — the best compromise between autocomplete and agent.

For it

  • Best tab autocomplete on the market (the actual differentiator)
  • Familiar VS Code interface, extensions keep working
  • Access to frontier models from several providers
  • Cloud agents, MCPs, hooks, Bugbot code review

Against it

  • Pricing structure has been reworked several times; usage limits are opaque
  • Weaker than terminal agents on very large repos
  • Additional consumption is billed usage-based

Pricing: Hobby $0 (limited agent requests + tab completions, no credit card required) · Individual from $20/month, tiered as Pro / Pro+ / Ultra (Pro+ for daily agent use, Ultra for power users) · Teams $40/user/month · Enterprise on request. Source: cursor.com/pricing (July 2026).

Sources: cursor.com · forum.cursor.com · forum.cursor.com · cursor.com

GitHub Copilot

AI assistant from GitHub/Microsoft: autocomplete, chat, cloud agent and CLI, deeply integrated into GitHub and VS Code.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Teams already living on GitHub — Copilot is the path of least resistance.

For it

  • Deepest integration into GitHub (issues, PRs, code review, Actions)
  • Cheapest serious entry point: $10/month
  • A real free plan with 2,000 completions/month
  • Enterprise approval usually already in place at large companies

Against it

  • Agent weaker than Claude Code, Cursor or Codex
  • The new credit system makes costs hard to track
  • Slower pace of innovation than the startups

Pricing: Free $0 (2,000 completions/month, base models, CLI) · Pro $10/user/month (unlimited completions + $15 monthly AI credits) · Pro+ $39/month (premium models incl. Opus, $70 credits) · Max $100/month ($200 credits, priority access) · Business & Enterprise on request. Source: github.com/features/copilot/plans (July 2026).

Sources: github.com · github.com · github.com · dash.partnerstack.com

Devin / Devin Desktop (Cognition, ehemals Windsurf)

Autonomous AI software engineer from Cognition: gets assigned a task and works through it on its own — now as a desktop IDE, cloud agent, CLI and code review.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Delegating tasks instead of pair programming — tickets you want to hand off and check later.

For it

  • Real autonomy: works through tasks without constant follow-up
  • One product across four surfaces (desktop, cloud, CLI, review)
  • Cloud agent included in the $20 Pro plan since the rebrand (previously positioned closer to enterprise)
  • Own model SWE 1.7 included free

Against it

  • Results on complex tasks are still unreliable — checking afterwards is mandatory
  • Confusion from the rebrand: Windsurf guides and tutorials are now outdated
  • Expensive if you really let the agent work

Pricing: Free $0 (light quota, restricted model selection, unlimited inline edits + tab completions) · Pro $20/month (higher quotas, frontier models from OpenAI/Claude/Gemini, cloud agents, overage at API prices) · Max $200/month · Teams $80/month + $40/developer seat · Enterprise on request. Source: devin.ai/pricing (July 2026). IMPORTANT: This makes the old ACU model ($2.25/ACU, $500 team plan) obsolete. windsurf.com/pricing returns a 308 redirect to devin.ai/pricing.

Sources: devin.ai · cognition.com · market.partnerstack.com · docs.devin.ai

OpenAI Codex

OpenAI's coding agent — runs in the cloud, via CLI, as an IDE extension and on iOS; included in the ChatGPT subscriptions.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Anyone already paying for ChatGPT who wants the agent working through several tasks in parallel.

For it

  • No extra subscription needed — included in ChatGPT Plus/Pro
  • Runs everywhere: web, CLI, IDE, iOS, Slack integration, code review
  • Very strong at parallel, isolated tasks in the cloud
  • Cheap entry via ChatGPT Go ($8)

Against it

  • The token credit system introduced in April 2026 makes costs hard to predict (limits per 5-hour window PLUS a weekly limit)
  • Realistic costs under heavy use are well above the subscription price
  • Usage shares the same pool with other ChatGPT agent features

Pricing: Free $0 (basic Codex for small tasks) · Go $8/month · Plus $20/month · Pro from $100/month (5x or 20x Plus limits) · Business $20/user/month (annual, from 2 users) · Enterprise/Edu on request · or an API key with pure token billing. Since April 2, 2026, billing runs on token credits instead of per message. Source: learn.chatgpt.com/docs/pricing (July 2026).

Sources: learn.chatgpt.com · help.openai.com · chatgpt.com

Raycast (Pro / Advanced AI) Advertising *

Keyboard launcher that drives the machine — apps, windows, snippets, scripts — and pulls the AI right into that command field instead of a browser tab.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Anyone who sits at the keyboard all day and wants the AI where they already work — one shortcut away, no context switch.

For it

  • The AI is always one key combination away, not a window and tab switch — the day-to-day difference is bigger than it sounds
  • Huge extension store; the thing grows with what you do
  • Free version fully usable with no time limit (AI capped at 50 messages there)
  • Now available for Windows too, no longer macOS only

Against it

  • The good models cost double: Pro ($8–10) plus the Advanced AI add-on (+$8) — you end up at ~$16–18/month
  • Learning curve: anyone not keyboard-inclined uses 5% of it

Pricing: Free $0 (permanent, incl. 50 AI messages). Pro $10/month or $8/month with annual billing (20% discount). Advanced AI add-on: +$8/month on top — only bookable as an add-on to the paid Pro plan, unlocks the top models. Team Free $0/user, Team Pro $15/user/month or $12 annually (+$8 for Advanced AI). Enterprise on request. (Source: official pricing page raycast.com/pricing)

Sources: raycast.com · raycast.com · affiliates.raycast.com · manual.raycast.com

Replit Advertising *

Full cloud development environment with an AI agent: builds, tests, deploys and hosts applications — including a PostgreSQL database and production infrastructure.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Anyone who wants to grow into the code, needs languages other than JavaScript, or needs real production infrastructure (DB, deployments, scaling).

For it

  • The most complete infrastructure in the category: built-in PostgreSQL, deployments, hosting, secrets
  • Hybrid: you can prompt AND write code yourself — no black-box lock-in
  • Not limited to JavaScript (Python & co. run)
  • Up to two agents in parallel (Core plan)

Against it

  • Effort-based pricing makes costs unpredictable — heavy users report $100–300/month ON TOP of the base plan
  • Most complex pricing structure in the category — hard to explain, hard to budget
  • For pure non-developers, the steepest learning curve of the AI builders

Pricing: Core: $20/month (annual approx. $240, ~20% savings) — includes $25 in monthly credit, up to 5 collaborators, two concurrent agents, unlimited workspaces, badge removal. Above that Pro and Enterprise. The agent bills "effort-based": simple changes under $0.25 per checkpoint, complex tasks get bundled into a larger checkpoint that costs more. Credits feed AI, deployments and compute. Source: https://replit.com/pricing + https://blog.replit.com/effort-based-pricing + https://docs.replit.com/billing/ai-billing

Sources: replit.com · replit.com · blog.replit.com · docs.replit.com

OpenRouter

A single API endpoint for over 400 language models from 70+ providers — you switch models without changing your code.

  • Free tier
Details

Comparing and switching language models without maintaining a separate account and key for every provider.

For it

  • 400+ models, 70+ providers via one OpenAI-compatible API (their own claim on the homepage)
  • NO markup on inference — you pay the provider price (official FAQ)
  • Automatic failover to other providers during outages → better availability
  • No subscription needed, credit-based model

Against it

  • Language models only — for image/video/audio it's the wrong place
  • Top-up fee: 5.5% (min. $0.80) via Stripe, 5% via crypto
  • BYOK (your own provider key) costs 5% of list price after 1M requests/month

Pricing: No subscription. Inference at provider price, explicitly with no markup (official FAQ). Fees: top-up via Stripe 5.5% (minimum $0.80), via crypto/Coinbase 5%. BYOK: first 1M requests/month free, then 5% of what the model would cost at OpenRouter.

Sources: openrouter.ai · openrouter.ai

RunPod

GPU cloud for rent — pods (whole machines) and serverless endpoints; the layer UNDERNEATH many of the aggregators listed here.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
  • EU
Details

Anyone who needs a whole GPU machine (training, ComfyUI, own models) instead of a ready-made model API.

For it

  • Cheaper than the hyperscalers; the community cloud cheaper still
  • Serverless and pods from one source — ComfyUI templates run out of the box

Against it

  • Cash only from 25 paying referrals up (then 10% via PartnerStack) — a high bar
  • Credits expire after 90 days

Pricing: Pay-per-use by GPU type and hour (pods) or per second (serverless); prices vary widely by GPU and cloud type — check runpod.io/pricing for current figures.

Sources: docs.runpod.io · runpod.io · runpod.io

Qwen (Alibaba)

Alibaba's model family — open weights, extremely popular in the open scene, plus paid cloud access via Alibaba Model Studio.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • local
Details

Open weights, your own fine-tuning, cost optimization

For it

  • Open weights in many sizes — the most-used base for custom fine-tuning (alongside Llama)
  • Considerably cheaper than Western providers; via the China endpoint (Beijing) another 60–70% cheaper than via Singapore
  • Chat app free to use
  • Very active open source community

Against it

  • Prices hard to verify cleanly: Alibaba Model Studio quotes different rates depending on endpoint (Singapore/Beijing) and promotion — deliberately marked here as partly unverified
  • Data protection/location China — the same issue as with DeepSeek
  • Practically irrelevant for non-technical users; this is a developer and self-hoster topic

Pricing: PARTLY UNVERIFIED — the official page (alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/model-pricing) could not be cleanly read, all figures below come from third-party sources and are to be checked before publishing: Qwen3-Max approx. $1.20/$6.00 per million tokens via DashScope (batch $0.60/$3.00). Current flagship Qwen3.7-Max allegedly $1.25/$3.75 as a 50% promotional price (list price $2.50/$7.50). All figures for the international endpoint Singapore; the China endpoint (Beijing) is 60–70% cheaper. Open weights: free to download, cost = your own hosting. Chat app: free.

Sources: alibabacloud.com · pricepertoken.com

Meta Llama

Meta's open model family — free to download, the foundation for most of the self-hosting scene.

  • Free
  • commercial ok
  • EU
  • local
Details

Self-hosting, full data control, fine-tuning

For it

  • Weights free — you only pay for hosting, no token fee to Meta
  • Largest ecosystem of tools, fine-tunes and guides among the open models
  • Full data control: runs on your own hardware, nothing leaves the machine
  • Cheap to rent across many providers (Together, Groq, Fireworks, Bedrock, etc.)

Against it

  • The license is NOT OSI open source but Meta's own community license: download, self-hosting and fine-tuning are permitted, commercial use at scale needs legal review. That has to be on the page
  • Self-hosting requires real skill and expensive hardware — not a realistic path for most readers
  • Meta's primary source (llama.com redirects to developer.meta.com/ai) was not machine-readable → current model claim only verifiable via reports

Pricing: Weights: free under Meta's community license (no token fee to Meta). Actual cost = hosting, either your own hardware or an inference provider (Together, Groq, Fireworks, AWS Bedrock …), whose prices vary widely. — MODEL STATUS UNVERIFIED FIRST-HAND: press reports mention Llama 5, released 04/08/2026 (600B parameters, 5M token context). The primary source was not retrievable — verify on llama.com before publication. The reports also contradict each other on the license (community license vs. Apache 2.0); when in doubt write "Meta's community license, not OSI open source".

Sources: llama.com · en.wikipedia.org · aiunpacking.com

Warp

AI-native terminal that has grown into an “agentic workbench”: multiple agents in parallel, locally and in the cloud.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Anyone who lives in the terminal and wants to run several agents at once.

For it

  • Multiple agents in parallel — a real workbench instead of a single chat
  • BYOK: your own API key from OpenAI/Anthropic/Google doesn't consume Warp credits
  • The modern terminal is a win even without AI
  • Reload credits available for purchase with volume discounts

Against it

  • Referral only pays in swag — no cash, worthless for publishers
  • Credit system with three buckets (AI, compute, platform) is needlessly complicated
  • The pricing change was received critically by the community
  • Free plan is very tight

Pricing: Free $0 (modern terminal, limited cloud agent access, bring your own AI inference) · Build $20/month ($18 annually; 1,500 credits/month for cloud and local agents, frontier models) · Max $200/month ($180 annually; 12× the credits of Build) · Business $50/user/month ($45 annually, up to 25 seats, SAML SSO) · Enterprise on request (your own LLMs, self-hosted cloud agents). Source: warp.dev/pricing (July 2026).

Sources: warp.dev · docs.warp.dev · news.ycombinator.com

Cline

Open-source coding agent for VS Code and JetBrains, also available as a CLI and SDK — runs on your own API key (BYOK).

  • Free
  • commercial ok
  • EU
  • local
Details

Full control and cost transparency: you pay exactly the tokens the agent consumes — no markup.

For it

  • Completely free and open source for individual developers
  • BYOK: no middleman markup, no vendor lock-in
  • Client-side architecture — the code doesn't leave your own machine for Cline
  • Largest community among the VS Code coding agents, MCP marketplace

Against it

  • Token costs can quickly reach $20–50/month and more under heavy use — "free" refers only to the software
  • Setup with your own API key puts off beginners
  • No autocomplete like Cursor — pure agent

Pricing: Open source $0 for individual developers (VS Code extension, CLI, MCP marketplace, community support) — you only pay for AI inference on your own API keys, no subscription. Enterprise on request (JetBrains extension, SSO/OIDC, SLA, central billing, RBAC, team dashboard). Source: cline.bot/pricing (July 2026). Realistic token costs under active use per third-party sources approx. $20–50/month — not officially confirmed, only as an order of magnitude.

Sources: cline.bot · github.com

Factory (Droid)

Agent platform for enterprises: "Droids" work autonomously across desktop, CLI and SDK on multi-step development tasks.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

Professionals and teams who want terminal agents at enterprise level — with commitments on data protection and compliance.

For it

  • Very strong on terminal tasks (number 1 on Terminal-Bench, by its own account)
  • Clear commitment: customer code is not used as training data; SOC 2 Type II
  • All frontier models usable (GPT-5, Claude Opus/Sonnet, Gemini)
  • Droid Computers: cloud machines managed by Factory for remote agents

Against it

  • NO free tier — entry only from $20/month
  • Clearly aimed at enterprises, little pull with a hobby audience
  • Less known than Cursor/Copilot — lower search volume

Pricing: No free tier. Pro $20/month (desktop, CLI, SDK; cloud and local background agents; usage stats) · Plus $100/month (approx. 5x Pro limits, Droid Computers) · Max $200/month (approx. 10x Pro limits, early access) · Business on request (up to 150 seats, SSO, SAML/SCIM, Zero Data Retention) · Enterprise on request (on-premise, dedicated compute). Source: factory.ai/pricing (July 2026).

Sources: factory.ai · docs.factory.ai

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

Build sites & apps

Describe it, have it built, put it live.

★ My pick Lovable — Der kürzeste Weg von der Idee zur fertigen, teilbaren App — ohne eine Zeile Code, und der Code gehört trotzdem dir.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

16 tools

Lovable

Prompt-to-app builder: describe an app in chat and out comes a React application with database, login and hosting — deploy at the push of a button included.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
  • EU
Details

Non-developers who want to go from thought to a visible, shareable app in hours; the result is portable (real code, GitHub sync).

For it

  • Cleanest, most "presentable" output of the AI builders — polished UI with no rework
  • Backend/DB/auth are built along with it (Lovable Cloud, on Supabase), nothing to wire up yourself
  • Real code + GitHub sync → no lock-in, a developer can take over later
  • Free tier for trying it out (5 credits/day, max. 30/month)

Against it

  • Credits are the real price — a failed attempt costs the same as a hit; complex prompts eat the monthly budget fast
  • Unused monthly credits expire after 2 months
  • No mobile apps (no Expo/native)
  • With genuinely complex business logic the automation stops — then you need someone who reads the code

Pricing: Free: $0 — 5 build credits/day, max. 30/month, plus 20 cloud credits/month (source: lovable.dev/pricing). Pro from $25/month for 100 credits, Business from $50/month (team features, SSO); annually Pro ~$21, Business ~$42 (source: third-party analyses, incl. nocode.mba — Lovable's pricing page does not render the figures statically, so the amounts are marked as third-party sourced). Credit consumption varies with complexity (0.50 credits for a button change up to ~1.70 for a landing page with images, source: lovable.dev/pricing). Monthly credits expire after 2 months, top-up credits after 12 months.

Sources: lovable.dev · lovable.dev · lovable.dev · docs.lovable.dev

Claude Code (Anthropic)

Agentic coding assistant in the terminal (plus IDE and web integration) that independently reads files, edits them, runs tests and commits.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

Serious work on real codebases in the terminal — multi-step refactors, bug fixes, migrations.

For it

  • Very strong on long, multi-step tasks in large repos
  • Terminal-native: fits into existing workflows, no IDE switch needed
  • Included in all paid Claude plans (no separate subscription)
  • MCP ecosystem: can be hooked into your own systems

Against it

  • On the Pro plan ($20) the limits for continuous use are hit fast — realistically you need Max from $100
  • Consumption is hard to predict
  • No free access (the Free plan does not include Claude Code)

Pricing: Free $0 (Claude Code NOT included) · Pro $20/month ($17 billed annually, Claude Code included) · Max from $100/month (5x or 20x Pro usage) · Team seat $25/month ($20 annually) · Premium seat $125 ($100 annually) · Enterprise on request. Source: claude.com/pricing (July 2026).

Sources: claude.com · anthropic.com · anthropic.com · growsurf.com

Hostinger Horizons

AI app builder from the host Hostinger: prompt in, web app out — hosting, domain and email included in the price.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
  • German
  • EU
Details

For it

  • All-in-one: app builder, hosting, domain, professional email in one subscription
  • By far the cheapest entry prices in the category (from ~$6.99/month on renewal)
  • No daily message limit (only the monthly credit budget caps you)

Against it

  • Considerably less capable than Lovable/Replit — too thin for serious products
  • Heavy lock-in to the Hostinger ecosystem (limited portability of the result)
  • The advertised low prices are promo prices for 12/24 months — renewal costs considerably more

Pricing: Four tiers from ~$6.99 to $79.99/month (renewal price). Examples per the provider: Explorer 12 months for $83.88 (regular $119.88), renews at $6.99/month; Starter 12 months for $167.88 (regular $239.88), renews at $13.99/month; Hustler 12 months for $479.88 (regular $671.88), renews at $39.99/month. Every plan includes hosting, email, error fixer, no daily limit — the cap is the monthly credit allowance. Source: https://www.hostinger.com/horizons/pricing

Sources: hostinger.com · hostinger.com · hostinger.com · hostinger.com

Base44

AI app builder (acquired by Wix in 2025 for ~$80M): generates complete applications from prompts with database, auth and hosting — all in the provider's runtime.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Internal tools and business apps that need to stand up fast and don't need to move.

For it

  • Very fast path to a working app including database and user management
  • Wix behind it: engineering, support and cloud infrastructure of an established corporation
  • Permanently free plan (25 message credits + 100 integration credits, unlimited apps)
  • Clear one-time bounty of $100 per referral — higher than most AI builders

Against it

  • The runtime isn't yours — the app lives in Base44's environment; portability is the sore point (several 2026 reviews highlight exactly this)
  • Two separate credit types (message and integration credits) make costs hard to track
  • Only a 30-day lock-in window: the referred user must become a paying customer within a month

Pricing: Free: $0 (25 message credits + 100 integration credits, unlimited apps — permanent). Starter $16/month. Builder $40/month (custom domain, GitHub integration). Pro $80/month. Elite $160/month. Amounts as monthly equivalent when billed annually; annual billing saves ~20%. Separate credit pools: message credits for building, integration credits for running the live app. Source: https://base44.com/blog/how-much-does-base44-cost + https://www.nocode.mba/articles/base44-review

Sources: base44.com · base44.com · nocode.mba · future-stack-reviews.com

Manus

General autonomous AI agent (not just coding): researches, browses, writes code, creates files and delivers finished results.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Tasks that go beyond code — research, analysis, documents, small apps, all in one run.

For it

  • A real general-purpose agent, not just coding
  • Generous free tier: 300 daily credits
  • Up to 20 parallel tasks on paid plans

Against it

  • Credits are gone fast — every action (browsing, running code, analyzing a file) costs
  • Politically unsettled: a Meta acquisition happened and was unwound by China
  • Quality fluctuates on long autonomous runs
  • Data protection/jurisdiction tricky for European users

Pricing: Free $0 (300 daily credits) · Standard $20/month (4,000 credits) · Customizable $40/month (8,000 credits) · Extended $200/month (40,000 credits). All paid plans additionally include 300 daily refresh credits, up to 20 parallel tasks; annual payment approx. 17% cheaper. Team/Enterprise on request. Source: manus.im/pricing — CAUTION: the pricing table is loaded via JavaScript and was not directly retrievable; figures come from the search index of the same page and should be double-checked in the browser before publication.

Sources: manus.im · manus.im · manus.im · techcrunch.com

Emergent

Vibe coding platform: web and mobile apps out of a prompt, hosting included — competitor to Lovable and Replit.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

For it

  • Web AND mobile out of one prompt
  • Pro plan with 1M context window and custom AI agents
  • Enormous growth (over $100M ARR in 8 months) = the audience is looking for it

Against it

  • Free plan with 10 credits/month is really only for trying it out
  • Much less known than Lovable — lower search volume
  • The jump from Standard ($20) to Pro ($200) is brutal, nothing in between
  • Young company, terms can change fast

Pricing: Free $0 (10 credits/month, web and mobile building, extended models) · Standard $20/month ($17 annually, 100 credits, private projects, GitHub integration) · Pro $200/month ($167 annually, 750 credits, 1M context window, "Ultra thinking", custom AI agents) · Business and Enterprise on request. Extra credits per third-party sources $10 for 50 credits (unverified). Source: emergent.sh/pricing (July 2026).

Sources: emergent.sh · app.emergent.sh · techcrunch.com

Gamma

Turns a prompt or a document into finished presentations, web pages and documents — with image models, and now video models too.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

A presentable deck or a quick one-pager site in twenty minutes, without touching PowerPoint.

For it

  • From idea to a decent-looking deck in minutes; the result is shareable by link (not just as a file)
  • Can also output web pages and documents, not just slides — including custom domains on the higher plans
  • Free plan to try it out; credits instead of a hard cap
  • Clearly the best search volume in the presentation niche — the traffic anchor for an index

Against it

  • The credit system is opaque: image and video models eat different amounts, and you only find out what 4,000 credits actually mean by using them
  • The typical Gamma look is recognizable — often too generic for brands with their own design language
  • Ultra ($100/month) is monthly only, with no annual discount

Pricing: Free $0. Plus $10/month (annual ~$8/month), 1,000 credits/month. Pro $20/month (annual ~$15–18/month depending on source), 4,000 credits/month. Ultra $100/month (monthly only, no annual plan), 20,000 credits/month. ⚠️ The credit amounts are officially verified (help.gamma.app); the dollar figures come from secondary sources because gamma.app/pricing blocks automated requests (HTTP 403). The help center states the annual discount as up to 28%.

Sources: help.gamma.app · gamma-partners-y9y8f3m.gamma.site · help.gamma.app · gamma.app

Framer

Visual website builder with AI generation — design tool and hosting in one; you design like in Figma and publish straight to your own domain.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
  • EU
Details

For it

  • Pro-level design quality and animations, without code
  • Hosting, CMS, forms, analytics are built in — no server, no deploy step
  • AI generates entire pages, but the result stays visually editable (not a black box)

Against it

  • NO real app backend — database, login, business logic aren't possible; this is a site builder, not an app builder
  • Pricing is PER SITE, not per account — multiple projects multiply the cost
  • Editor seats have cost extra since May 2026 ($20/editor/month)

Pricing: Free: $0 (full editor + AI, Framer subdomain with branding only). Basic $10/month (annual) — custom domain. Pro $30/month (annual) — CMS, staging, analytics. Scale from $100/month (annual only). Enterprise on request. Prices are PER SITE. Editor seats $20/editor/month, content editor $10/month (as of May 2026). Source: https://www.framer.com/pricing and https://www.framer.com/blog/ai-credits-simpler-plans-and-lower-prices/

Sources: framer.com · framer.com · framer.com · framer.com

Webflow

Professional visual website builder with CMS and AI assistance — produces clean HTML/CSS and hosts the site itself.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Content-heavy brand and marketing sites with a CMS

For it

  • The established professional standard for visual web design with a real CMS
  • Very clean, semantic code output — no “AI debt pile”
  • 50% revenue share for 12 months + 90-day cookie; the Premium tier also pays on renewal
  • Huge audience (designers, marketers, agencies) — content about it finds readers

Against it

  • Steep learning curve — the editor assumes an understanding of HTML/CSS concepts (box model, flex)
  • No app backend: logic, user accounts, data processing only via third parties
  • The AI features are an add-on, not the core — anyone expecting “prompt in, app out” is in the wrong place

Pricing: Site plans 2026 (after the simplification in May 2026): Starter free (2 pages, 1 GB traffic, webflow.io subdomain). Basic $15/month annually or $25 monthly (up to 300 pages, no CMS). Premium $25/month annually or $39 monthly (CMS with 20,000 items, 40 collections) — replaces the former CMS and Business tiers. Workspace/seat costs come on top separately. Source: https://webflow.com/pricing + https://help.webflow.com/hc/en-us/articles/51059955082387-Updated-pricing-and-simplified-plans-for-May-2026

Sources: help.webflow.com · webflow.com · webflow.com · market.partnerstack.com

Bolt.new (StackBlitz)

Browser-based AI builder that generates entire web and mobile apps and deploys them directly — runs completely in the browser (WebContainers), terminal included.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Technically confident builders who want framework freedom (React, Vue, Svelte, Astro) or need mobile from day one (via Expo).

For it

  • Framework freedom: not nailed to React/Next
  • Mobile apps via Expo — Lovable and Framer can't do that
  • Full terminal + file system in the browser: you can intervene, not just prompt
  • Token rollover: unused tokens from paid plans roll over one month (valid up to two months)

Against it

  • Token consumption scales with PROJECT SIZE, not with the task — the bigger the project, the more expensive every single message gets; this is the notorious cost trap
  • Design output less polished than Lovable — it needs more steering
  • Teams pay $30 per seat, and tokens are NOT shared

Pricing: Free: 1M tokens/month, daily cap of 300,000 tokens. Pro: $25/month with 10M tokens. Teams: $30/member/month. Enterprise on request. 10% discount when paid annually. All paid plans: token rollover, custom domain, no Bolt branding. Source: https://bolt.new/pricing + https://support.bolt.new/release-notes

Sources: support.bolt.new · bolt.new · support.bolt.new · nocode.mba

Softr

AI app builder for business software: turns structured data (Airtable, Google Sheets, your own DB) into portals, dashboards, and internal tools — no code.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
  • EU
Details

Client portals, internal tools, and data-driven applications on top of existing tables/databases.

For it

  • The most pragmatic path from a spreadsheet to a real, access-controlled application
  • Unlimited apps on every plan — the pricing lever is USERS, not apps
  • User groups, permissions, and portals are core features, not workarounds

Against it

  • Considerably more expensive to start than the AI builders (from $49/month annually, $59 monthly)
  • No "prompt in, finished app out" like Lovable — Softr is a construction kit with AI assistance
  • The user cap bites: 20 app users on Basic, 100 on Professional, 500 on Business
  • Additionally capped on user groups, custom domains, AI credits, and data sources

Pricing: Free: $0 (10 app users, unlimited published apps). Basic from $49/month billed annually ($59 billed monthly) — 20 app users. Professional — 100 app users. Business — 500 app users. Enterprise on request (SSO, audit logs, advanced security). 30-day trial. The pricing lever is the number of APP USERS, not the number of apps (that's unlimited); on top of that there are limits on records, user groups, domains, AI credits, and data sources. Source: https://www.softr.io/pricing

Sources: docs.softr.io · market.partnerstack.com · softr.io · softr.io

Bubble

Visual no-code platform for full web apps with its own database and workflow logic; now combinable with AI prompting that you can keep editing visually.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

Complex, logic-heavy web applications where you still have to dig in deep after the AI start — Bubble's differentiator is switching between prompt and visual editor.

For it

  • The deepest no-code logic layer on the market — workflows, conditions, data relationships that AI builders can't represent this way
  • Can switch back and forth between AI prompting and visual editor (instead of a black box)
  • Huge ecosystem: plugins, agencies, templates, forums
  • Over a decade on the market, no risk of it disappearing

Against it

  • Workload units make costs unpredictable: around $0.30 per 1,000 additional WU above the allowance
  • Considerably more expensive than the AI builders (Starter $29, Growth $119/month)
  • Steep learning curve; feels dated next to Lovable/Bolt

Pricing: Starter: $29/month with 175,000 workload units (recurring workflows, basic version control). Growth: $119/month with 250,000 workload units (advanced version control, 2FA, two app editors, ten branches). Team/Enterprise above that. Overage costs around $0.30 per 1,000 additional workload units. Workload units measure server load: every database query, every workflow, every API call consumes some. Source: https://manual.bubble.io/account-and-marketplace/account-and-billing/pricing-plans + third-party analyses (nocode.mba, adalo.com) for the specific figures.

Sources: bubble.io · forum.bubble.io · forum.bubble.io · manual.bubble.io

Cursor

AI IDE (VS Code fork) with tab autocomplete and an agent that works autonomously across multiple files.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Anyone who wants a real IDE instead of a terminal — the best compromise between autocomplete and agent.

For it

  • Best tab autocomplete on the market (the actual differentiator)
  • Familiar VS Code interface, extensions keep working
  • Access to frontier models from several providers
  • Cloud agents, MCPs, hooks, Bugbot code review

Against it

  • Pricing structure has been reworked several times; usage limits are opaque
  • Weaker than terminal agents on very large repos
  • Additional consumption is billed usage-based

Pricing: Hobby $0 (limited agent requests + tab completions, no credit card required) · Individual from $20/month, tiered as Pro / Pro+ / Ultra (Pro+ for daily agent use, Ultra for power users) · Teams $40/user/month · Enterprise on request. Source: cursor.com/pricing (July 2026).

Sources: cursor.com · forum.cursor.com · forum.cursor.com · cursor.com

Devin / Devin Desktop (Cognition, ehemals Windsurf)

Autonomous AI software engineer from Cognition: gets assigned a task and works through it on its own — now as a desktop IDE, cloud agent, CLI and code review.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

Delegating tasks instead of pair programming — tickets you want to hand off and check later.

For it

  • Real autonomy: works through tasks without constant follow-up
  • One product across four surfaces (desktop, cloud, CLI, review)
  • Cloud agent included in the $20 Pro plan since the rebrand (previously positioned closer to enterprise)
  • Own model SWE 1.7 included free

Against it

  • Results on complex tasks are still unreliable — checking afterwards is mandatory
  • Confusion from the rebrand: Windsurf guides and tutorials are now outdated
  • Expensive if you really let the agent work

Pricing: Free $0 (light quota, restricted model selection, unlimited inline edits + tab completions) · Pro $20/month (higher quotas, frontier models from OpenAI/Claude/Gemini, cloud agents, overage at API prices) · Max $200/month · Teams $80/month + $40/developer seat · Enterprise on request. Source: devin.ai/pricing (July 2026). IMPORTANT: This makes the old ACU model ($2.25/ACU, $500 team plan) obsolete. windsurf.com/pricing returns a 308 redirect to devin.ai/pricing.

Sources: devin.ai · cognition.com · market.partnerstack.com · docs.devin.ai

Replit Advertising *

Full cloud development environment with an AI agent: builds, tests, deploys and hosts applications — including a PostgreSQL database and production infrastructure.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Anyone who wants to grow into the code, needs languages other than JavaScript, or needs real production infrastructure (DB, deployments, scaling).

For it

  • The most complete infrastructure in the category: built-in PostgreSQL, deployments, hosting, secrets
  • Hybrid: you can prompt AND write code yourself — no black-box lock-in
  • Not limited to JavaScript (Python & co. run)
  • Up to two agents in parallel (Core plan)

Against it

  • Effort-based pricing makes costs unpredictable — heavy users report $100–300/month ON TOP of the base plan
  • Most complex pricing structure in the category — hard to explain, hard to budget
  • For pure non-developers, the steepest learning curve of the AI builders

Pricing: Core: $20/month (annual approx. $240, ~20% savings) — includes $25 in monthly credit, up to 5 collaborators, two concurrent agents, unlimited workspaces, badge removal. Above that Pro and Enterprise. The agent bills "effort-based": simple changes under $0.25 per checkpoint, complex tasks get bundled into a larger checkpoint that costs more. Credits feed AI, deployments and compute. Source: https://replit.com/pricing + https://blog.replit.com/effort-based-pricing + https://docs.replit.com/billing/ai-billing

Sources: replit.com · replit.com · blog.replit.com · docs.replit.com

v0 (by Vercel)

AI generator from Vercel: turns prompts into complete Next.js applications (server components, API routes) and deploys them straight to Vercel.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
  • watermark
Details

Teams already sitting on Vercel/Next.js with at least one developer on board.

For it

  • Produces real, production-grade Next.js code — not toy output
  • Deploy to Vercel, GitHub sync, Figma import, Design Mode for visual tweaking
  • v0 API on paid plans (embeddable in your own tools)
  • Free tier with $5 in monthly credits for testing

Against it

  • Really only makes sense inside the Next.js/Vercel ecosystem — strong lock-in
  • Billing by input/output tokens instead of messages — hard to predict

Pricing: Free: $0 with $5 in monthly credits, deploy to Vercel, Design Mode, GitHub sync. Premium: $20/month with $20 in credits, purchasable extra credits, Figma import, v0 API. Team: $30/user/month with shared credits and centralized billing. Business: $100/user/month (data not used for training, SAML SSO, RBAC, SLA, SOC 2/ISO/GDPR/HIPAA). Enterprise on request. Billing runs on input/output tokens converted into credits; purchased credits expire after a year. Source: https://v0.app/pricing + https://vercel.com/blog/updated-v0-pricing

Sources: vercel.com · partners.dub.co · v0.app · vercel.com

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

3D & animation

Models, characters, motion.

★ My pick Meshy AI — Der 3D-Generator, den man jemandem als Erstes in die Hand drückt: Text oder Foto rein, texturiertes Modell raus — mit echter Gratis-Stufe und Exporten, mit denen man in Blender, Unity oder Unreal wirklich weiterarbeiten kann.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

10 tools

Meshy AI Advertising *

Text- and image-to-3D generator with PBR texturing, topology control and broad export formats — the most pipeline-ready of the generators.

  • Free tier
  • commercial ok
Details

For it

  • Most mature pipeline: text-to-3D, image-to-3D, PBR textures, topology control, broad exports — teams can do real work with it
  • Meshy-6 was preferred over Tripo 3.1 by 63.8% in a test with 1,331 senior 3D artists (NetEase, Tencent)
  • Free tier with 100 credits/month, no credit card
  • Clear value for money: Pro for $20/mo with API access

Against it

  • Free tier assets are under CC BY 4.0, so they require attribution; private ownership only from Pro up
  • 20 credits per full generation — the 100 free credits cover around five models

Pricing: Free 100 credits/mo (assets under CC BY 4.0, low queue priority) · Pro $20/mo or $240/year = 1,000 credits/mo, 60% faster generation, API, private assets, 10 parallel tasks · Studio $60/mo or $576/year (team tier) · Enterprise on request. A full generation costs 20 credits. (Source: meshy.ai/pricing)

Sources: meshy.ai · meshy.ai · help.meshy.ai

Tripo AI Advertising *

Text- and image-to-3D generator optimized for speed — usable models in about ten seconds.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
Details

For it

  • Fastest generator in the field (~10 seconds per model)
  • Generous free tier: 200 credits/month, roughly 8 models
  • The annual plan halves the price (Pro effectively $13.93/mo)

Against it

  • In a head-to-head test with 1,331 3D professionals, Tripo 3.1 lost to Meshy-6 (63.8% preferred Meshy)
  • The free tier limits downloads (v2.5 model, max 15/month)
  • Commercial use only on the paid tiers
  • The Team plan at $109.90/seat/mo is comparatively expensive

Pricing: Free 200 credits/mo (up to 8 models) · Pro $19.90/mo, $13.93/mo on the annual plan ($167.16/year) = 3,000 credits/mo · Max $89.90/mo, $53.94/mo on the annual plan ($647.28/year) = 25,000 credits/mo · Team $109.90/seat/mo, $54.93/seat/mo on the annual plan = 45,000 credits/mo. Paying annually saves 50%. (Source: tripo3d.ai/pricing)

Sources: tripo3d.ai · tripo3d.ai · meshy.ai

Luma AI

Video and image generation (Ray models, formerly "Dream Machine") plus 3D capture/NeRF — now positioned as an agentic creative platform.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

For it

  • Bundles its own and third-party models (Kling, Veo, Seedance, Seedream, ElevenLabs) under one interface — one subscription, many models
  • Includes utilities like background removal, upscaling, reframing
  • The 3D capture roots (NeRF) are still relevant for film people
  • Annual payment saves around 20%

Against it

  • NO free tier on the pricing page anymore — entry starts at $30/month
  • Expensive at the top end: Ultra costs $300/month

Pricing: No free tier listed. Plus $30/mo or $25/mo on the annual plan ($300/year) = 10,000 credits · Pro $90/mo or $75/mo annually ($900/year) = 40,000 credits · Ultra $300/mo or $250/mo annually ($3,000/year) = 150,000 credits · Team and Enterprise on request. (Source: lumalabs.ai/pricing)

Sources: lumalabs.ai · lumalabs.ai · openaffiliate.dev

Autodesk Flow Studio (ehemals Wonder Studio / Wonder Dynamics)

Automatically turns live-action footage into editable CG scenes: actors are detected, tracked and replaced with 3D characters — including mocap, camera and lighting.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

For it

  • The most interesting tool on this list for a filmmaker in terms of content: VFX work that used to need a team, from a single file
  • Free tier since 2025 — also usable as a pure AI mocap service
  • Prices cut sharply: Lite from $20 to $10/mo., Pro from $99.99 to $95/mo.
  • The Pro tier is included in Autodesk's Media & Entertainment Collection at no extra cost

Against it

  • The free tier watermarks the output
  • The credit system noticeably limits runtime
  • Since the Autodesk acquisition an agile startup has become a corporate product — pace and community have suffered

Pricing: Free (watermarked output, usable as AI mocap) · Lite $10/mo. = 2,100 credits/mo. · Standard $45/mo. or $360/year = 6,000 credits/mo. · Pro $95/mo. or $765/year = 12,000 credits/mo. (Source: Autodesk investor announcement on the freemium launch + cgchannel.com/2025/08/autodesk-cuts-prices-of-flow-studio-subscriptions/)

Sources: autodesk.com · investors.autodesk.com · cgchannel.com · autodesk.com

Move AI (Move One / Move Pro)

Markerless motion capture: ordinary video — even from an iPhone — becomes 3D motion data, no suit and no studio.

  • Free tier
Details

For it

  • Mocap without a suit and without markers: a phone camera is enough for Move One
  • Free tier with 30 one-time credits that don't expire
  • Move Pro captures up to 22 people simultaneously across 20×20 m
  • Genesis (on-premise, Nvidia GPUs) targets optical studio quality

Against it

  • Credits are consumed per person per second — with multi-person shoots it gets expensive fast
  • Monthly credits expire and don't roll over
  • Recording length is capped (60 seconds paid, 30 seconds free)

Pricing: Move One: Free = one-time 30 credits (don't expire, no top-up possible) · Starter $18 + VAT/mo = 60 credits · Standard $48 + VAT/mo = 180 credits · Plus $225 + VAT/mo = 240 credits · Advanced $490 + VAT/mo = 700 credits. Consumption: Gen 1 (s1) 1 credit per person per second, Gen 2 (s2) 2 credits. Move Pro / Move Live / Genesis: on request only. (Source: docs.move.ai/knowledge/move-one-pricing)

Sources: docs.move.ai · move.ai · developers.move.ai

Rokoko

Motion capture ecosystem of hardware (Smartsuit Pro, gloves) and software — plus Rokoko Vision, which does mocap from a normal webcam.

  • Free tier
  • EU
  • local
Details

For it

  • Rokoko Vision with one camera is free forever — the lowest barrier to entry into mocap there is
  • The combination of suit and software covers the whole path from the shoot to the engine
  • Established brand with a large community and plenty of learning material
  • Indie Creator bundle with a discount for freelancers and micro-studios (under $100,000 revenue, max. 3 full-time staff)

Against it

  • Serious use means buying hardware — four-figure amounts
  • Vision (webcam mocap) is considerably less accurate than the suit; dual-cam only as a 14-day trial

Pricing: Rokoko Vision single-cam: free forever, 15 seconds per recording; dual-cam only as a 14-day trial. Rokoko Studio subscriptions: according to third-party sources from approx. $20/mo — I could not verify the official pricing page (rokoko.com/pricing), so UNVERIFIED here. Hardware (Smartsuit Pro, Smartgloves) separate, prices likewise not verified.

Sources: rokoko.com · rokoko.com · support.rokoko.com · rokoko.com

Spline (+ Spline AI)

3D design in the browser — model, animate, make interactive, and embed directly into websites; Spline AI generates 3D objects from text and image.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

For it

  • Free tier available
  • The AI add-on costs only $5/seat/month on top
  • Code export and web embedding make it usable for developers

Against it

  • The commission rate isn't published anywhere
  • Free tier puts watermarks on web exports
  • Application with approval required

Pricing: Free $0 (limited files, unlimited viewers, watermark on web export) · Starter $12/seat/month billed annually or $15 monthly · Professional $20/seat/month billed annually or $25 monthly · Enterprise on request. Spline AI as an add-on: +$5/seat/month for 2,000 AI credits/month. (Source: spline.design/pricing)

Sources: spline.design · spline.design

Hyper3D Rodin

3D generator with an unusual payment model: generating is free and unlimited, you only pay when you download.

  • Free tier
Details

For it

  • Generating costs nothing — you only pay for what you actually want to keep; that's fairer than any credit subscription
  • Rated in comparison tests as one of the strongest generators for professional output quality
  • Annual plan saves 20%
  • Dedicated education tier

Against it

  • Single credits are expensive at $1.50
  • The Business tier (with API) jumps to $120/month
  • Smaller community and less learning material than Meshy or Tripo

Pricing: Free $0 — generating is free, you pay per result (single credits $1.50) · Creator $30/month or $24/month on the annual plan ($288/year) = credits for roughly 60 models · Business $120/month or $96/month on the annual plan ($1,152/year) = credits for roughly 416 models, incl. full API access · Education (verified students/teachers) with Creator scope · Enterprise on request. (Source: hyper3d.ai/pricing)

Sources: hyper3d.ai · buildmvpfast.com

Cascadeur

Keyframe animation software whose AI suggests physically plausible poses — built for fight, sports and action movement without a mocap suit.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • local
Details

For it

  • The Indie and Pro annual plans turn into PERPETUAL LICENSES after twelve months — in a world doing the exact opposite right now (see Topaz), a strong argument
  • Indie costs only $8/month on the annual plan
  • Real free tier, permanent
  • Physics-assisted AutoPosing is unique — no other tool does it this way

Against it

  • Free tier prohibits commercial use and only exports .casc (no FBX/DAE)
  • Indie license is tied to a revenue cap of $100,000/year
  • Steep learning curve — it's an animation tool, not a one-click generator

Pricing: Free $0 permanently (no commercial use; export limited to 300 frames and 120 joints per scene, .casc only) · Indie $19/mo. or $8/mo. on the annual plan ($96/year), commercial use up to $100,000 annual revenue · Pro $49/mo. or $33/mo. on the annual plan ($396/year), unlimited commercial · Teams $49 or $33 per user/mo. (2–6 users). Indie and Pro annual plans turn into perpetual licenses after one year. (Source: cascadeur.com/plans)

Sources: cascadeur.com · partners.cascadeur.com · cascadeur.com

Kaedim

2D-to-3D for game assets — no longer a self-serve tool but a production service for studios with human quality control.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

For it

  • Output is "production-ready" — Kaedim pushes AI results through human review instead of shipping them raw
  • Aimed at AAA studios and brands, not hobbyists
  • Transparent per-asset billing according to the vendor

Against it

  • Self-serve plans are GONE — only custom contracts via sales calls
  • Historically dogged by criticism (allegations that more manual labor is involved than communicated)

Pricing: No public plans anymore. Kaedim writes custom contracts as needed with per-asset billing and says it has temporarily closed its standard plans. Older figures ($299/mo for 30 models up to $7,700/mo for 1,000 models, 3-day trial for $6) are OUTDATED and must not go on the site in that form. (Source: kaedim3d.com/pricing)

Sources: kaedim3d.com · kaedim3d.com

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

All models in one place

One login, many models, one bill.

★ My pick Replicate — Größter Modell-Katalog, beste Doku — und als einzige der Plattformen räumt die AGB die Ausgabe ausdrücklich zur kommerziellen Nutzung frei.

Links marked with * are affiliate links. If you buy or subscribe through one, I receive a commission. The price stays the same for you. Which tool you choose is entirely up to you.

18 tools

Replicate

Marketplace and hosting for thousands of public AI models you can run via API with one line of code — plus deploy your own models.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
Details

Trying out a new model fast before you take it into production somewhere else. The catalog is the strength.

For it

  • Largest open model catalog in the category; the community pushes new models in very fast
  • Best documentation of the developer platforms
  • Your own models/fine-tunes can be hosted as a private deployment
  • Startup program with $1,000–10,000 in credits (non-dilutive, no VC needed)

Against it

  • Usually more expensive than fal for the same models
  • Private models also cost setup and idle time, not just compute time
  • No free tier on the pricing page

Pricing: Pay-per-use, two modes: (a) by time — CPU (Small) $0.000025/sec ($0.09/h) · Nvidia T4 $0.000225/sec ($0.81/h) · A100 80 GB $0.001400/sec ($5.04/h) · H100 $0.001525/sec ($5.49/h); (b) by input/output — e.g. Claude 3.7 Sonnet $3.00 per million input tokens. Private models: the entire instance runtime is billed.

Sources: replicate.com · replicate.com · ycombinator.com

Magnific (ehemals Freepik) Advertising *

The former Freepik platform: stock library plus a complete AI suite (image, video, audio, upscaling, editor) — united under the name Magnific since 04/28/2026.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
  • EU
Details

The all-rounder for people who need stock, image generation and upscaling in one subscription — agency and marketing day-to-day.

For it

  • ⚠️ IMPORTANT: Freepik has been called Magnific since 04/28/2026 — freepik.com redirects to magnific.com. Anyone still linking "Freepik" is linking a dead brand name
  • Combines stock assets (250M+), AI generation, the Magnific upscaler and a collaborative workspace
  • Over 1M paying subscribers, $230M ARR, bootstrapped and profitable — no startup failure risk
  • On Premium+/Pro around 10 image models generate without consuming credits

Against it

  • Credit system across the whole suite: video/audio always consume credits, even on the most expensive plan
  • The rebrand is fresh — docs, links and third-party sources are still inconsistent in places

Pricing: Free tier available (limited daily access, per the docs ~20 generations/day, 10 downloads/day, personal use only with attribution). Paid tiers per official docs (AI credits): Premium 20,000/month or 240,000/year · Premium+ 45,000/month or 600,000/year · Pro 300,000/month or 4M/year · Business 45,000 per seat/month · Enterprise custom. Prices per third-party sources approx. $14.50 (Premium), $33.75 (Premium+), $210 (Pro) monthly when paid annually — not officially retrievable, check yourself.

Sources: magnific.com · magnific.com · thenextweb.com · tech.eu

Higgsfield AI

Video-first aggregator: bundles 15+ video and image models (Sora, Veo, Kling, Wan, Seedance, Hailuo …) under one subscription, with camera movements and effect presets as its differentiator.

  • Free tier
  • watermark
Details

AI video production without code, when you want to compare several models and control camera moves.

For it

  • One subscription for the major video models instead of five separate ones
  • Camera presets and motion controls — exactly the language film people speak
  • Plus "Higgsfield Earn": pays creators directly for high-performing AI videos on Instagram (up to $1,000 on day one, max. $2,500 lifetime per video, per the official site)

Against it

  • Per third-party sources, credits expire 90 days after purchase and don't roll into the following month — an expensive trap
  • Per third-party sources, monthly billing costs 50–60% more than annual
  • The pricing page serves no machine-readable figures — everything below is sourced from third parties

Pricing: ⚠️ Not officially verifiable — higgsfield.ai/pricing serves no pricing table when fetched. Per third-party sources (annual billing): Starter $15/month (200 credits), Plus $39/month (1,000 credits), Ultra $99/month (3,000 credits, scalable up to 9,000), plus team plans. Credit packs approx. $5 per 100 credits, valid for 90 days. Check for yourself before recommending.

Sources: higgsfield.ai · higgsfield.ai · higgsfield.ai · startuphub.ai

Poe (Quora)

Chat interface that makes thousands of AI models and bots accessible under one subscription — LLMs, image and video models via a shared points system.

  • Free tier
Details

One subscription to test all the major chat models side by side without paying for five subscriptions.

For it

  • One subscription for GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.5, Veo, Sora, and thousands of other bots
  • Very fine-grained pricing tiers — entry from $4.17/month (annual billing)
  • Build and publish your own bots; bot creators can earn a share
  • Group chats with several models at once

Against it

  • Compute points are hard to keep track of — you don't know in advance how far you'll get
  • Second choice for media production: it's a chat interface, not a production tool
  • No visible free tier on the plan page

Pricing: Per poe.com/subscription_plans (annual billing, 17% savings): Basic $4.17/month (10,000 points) · Standard $16.67/month (660,000 points) · Professional $41.67/month (1.65M) · Business $83.33/month (3.3M) · Enterprise $208.33/month (8.25M). Monthly billing is more expensive (third-party sources cite, among others, $19.99 for the Standard tier). Different models consume different amounts of points per message.

Sources: poe.com · poe.com · costbench.com

Pollo AI

Consumer aggregator for AI video: bundles Kling, Runway, Hailuo, Vidu, Hunyuan, and its own models in one interface, plus an API platform.

  • Free tier
Details

For it

  • One subscription for the major video models, without paying each provider separately
  • Also usable as an API platform (pollo.ai/api-platform)
  • Free credits on sign-up

Against it

  • Cookie duration not findable
  • Minimum payout $100, billing only between the 10th and 15th of the following month
  • Brand is less established than Higgsfield or Krea — a trust question when recommending it

Pricing: Subscription model with credits, tiers at pollo.ai/pricing (free credits on sign-up). Concrete amounts not machine-retrievable — check yourself before recommending. No figures here because unverified.

Sources: pollo.ai · polloai.tapfiliate.com · pollo.ai · pollo.ai

Higgsfield

Aggregator platform focused on cinematic camera movement and VFX for social content — bundles third-party top models (Kling, Veo, Nano Banana Pro) under one interface.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

For it

  • Camera movement presets that otherwise have to be laboriously prompted
  • One subscription, many models — Kling 3.0, Veo, Nano Banana Pro under one roof
  • Plus "Higgsfield Earn": pays creators directly for posting AI videos (up to $2,500 lifetime per video)

Against it

  • It's a layer on top, not a frontier model of its own — you pay a markup on other people's models
  • Credits expire monthly, no rollover
  • Very social-/short-form-heavy — less deep than Runway for long brand commercials

Pricing: WARNING: the official pricing page serves no content to automated clients; figures from secondary sources (as of 2026, after the rename from Basic/Pro/Ultimate to Starter/Plus/Ultra): Starter ~$15/month (annual) with 200 credits/month · Plus ~$39/month (annual) with 1,000 credits, all models, parallel generations · Ultra ~$99/month (annual) with 3,000 credits · additional credit packs ~$5/100 credits. Credits expire monthly. Sources: https://www.scopeful.org/tools/higgsfield · https://flowith.io/blog/higgsfield-pricing-2026-free-vs-creator-vs-studio/ · https://higgsfield.ai/pricing (official)

Sources: higgsfield.ai · x.com · adskull.io · startuphub.ai

Freepik (AI Video Suite)

Aggregator that bundles the top models (Veo 3, Kling, Runway Gen-4

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
  • German
  • EU
Details

For it

  • You don't need five subscriptions to compare the models
  • Routing engine sends a shot to whichever model fits it

Against it

  • Markup over using the models directly; power users are better off with a direct subscription
  • Less granular control than the original interfaces (Runway/Flow)
  • Cookie duration also stated inconsistently (30 vs. 60 days)

Pricing: unverified — the current subscription tiers for the Freepik AI suite could not be cleanly verified in this research. Check https://www.freepik.com/pricing before publishing and cite with a date. Only the feature scope is verified: the subscription includes Google Veo 3, Kling, Runway Gen-4.5, MiniMax Hailuo, PixVerse, Wan and LTX-2 Pro, among others. Source: https://freepik.app/en

Sources: freepik.app · affiliateprogramdb.com · openaffiliate.dev · affiliateotter.com

Krea

Creative interface that bundles many image, video and 3D models under one UI — with real-time canvas, upscaling and your own LoRA training.

  • Free tier
  • commercial from paid tier
  • watermark
Details

The one subscription if you're a creative who wants to try many image/video models without coding.

For it

  • Over 60 models in one interface, one shared credit currency ("compute units") instead of 10 subscriptions
  • Real-time generation (realtime canvas) — you watch the image come into being as you draw
  • Generous free tier: 100 compute units per day, refreshed daily, no credit card
  • Covers image, video, 3D, lipsync, LoRA training and upscaling — the complete package for film people

Against it

  • Credit system obscures what a generation actually costs
  • Monthly credits expire; purchased packs after 90 days
  • Pricing page blocks automated requests — the figures below are partly only backed by secondary sources

Pricing: Free: 100 compute units per day (refilled daily). Paid according to third-party sources: Basic ~$9/month, Pro ~$35/month, Max ~$70/month, Business ~$200/month, plus Enterprise. ⚠️ The included unit amounts contradict each other between third-party sources (Max: 40,000 vs. 60,000 units) — the official page krea.ai/pricing blocks bots. Check yourself before recommending; do NOT present the numbers as verified.

Sources: krea.ai · costbench.com · tooljunction.io

fal.ai (fal)

Serverless inference platform built specifically for generative media — image, video, audio, 3D — with its own fast GPUs and billing per output.

  • Paid only
Details

When you're building image/video/audio models into your own tools via API and speed matters. The default building block for media AI in the backend.

For it

  • Media focus: Flux, Veo, Kling, Wan, Seedream, Nano Banana etc. through one API
  • Billing per successful output — no cost for server errors or queue time (official docs)
  • Noticeably faster on video than the generalists; low cold starts
  • Plain GPU rental also possible: H100 from $1.89/h, B200 from $3.49/h (discount prices per the pricing page)

Against it

  • Docs are considered messier than Replicate's
  • Costs run up fast on video (Veo 3: $0.40/second)

Pricing: Pure pay-per-use, no subscription. Examples per fal.ai/pricing: Seedream V4 $0.03/image · Flux Kontext Pro $0.04/image · Nano Banana $0.0398/image · Wan 2.5 $0.05/sec · Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro $0.07/sec · Veo 3 $0.40/sec. GPU rental (discount/list price): H100 $1.89/$3.99 · H200 $2.10/$4.50 · B200 $3.49/$6.25 · B300 $4.49/$8.50 · RTX PRO 6000 $1.10/$2.99 per hour.

Sources: fal.ai · fal.ai · fal.ai

OpenRouter

A single API endpoint for over 400 language models from 70+ providers — you switch models without changing your code.

  • Free tier
Details

Comparing and switching language models without maintaining a separate account and key for every provider.

For it

  • 400+ models, 70+ providers via one OpenAI-compatible API (their own claim on the homepage)
  • NO markup on inference — you pay the provider price (official FAQ)
  • Automatic failover to other providers during outages → better availability
  • No subscription needed, credit-based model

Against it

  • Language models only — for image/video/audio it's the wrong place
  • Top-up fee: 5.5% (min. $0.80) via Stripe, 5% via crypto
  • BYOK (your own provider key) costs 5% of list price after 1M requests/month

Pricing: No subscription. Inference at provider price, explicitly with no markup (official FAQ). Fees: top-up via Stripe 5.5% (minimum $0.80), via crypto/Coinbase 5%. BYOK: first 1M requests/month free, then 5% of what the model would cost at OpenRouter.

Sources: openrouter.ai · openrouter.ai

Together AI

Inference and training platform for open models (Llama, DeepSeek, Qwen & co.) — serverless per token or as rented GPU clusters.

  • Free tier
Details

Running or fine-tuning open-weight language models in production when you want neither OpenAI nor Anthropic.

For it

  • Very broad: chat, vision, embeddings, image, video, transcription, fine-tuning, GPU clusters
  • Cheap at volume with open-weight models
  • Dedicated endpoints and real GPU clusters (not just an API)
  • Generous startup program: up to $50,000 in credits via the Startup Accelerator

Against it

  • Focused on text/open-weight — for media AI, fal is the better address
  • The pricing structure is complex (tokens, GPU hours, fine-tuning tokens, storage all separate)

Pricing: Serverless per token: $0.0015–4.50 per million tokens depending on model. Images $0.0006–0.134/image. Video $0.14–3.20/video. Transcription from $0.0015/minute. Dedicated endpoints: H100 $5.49/h, B200 $8.99/h. GPU clusters on-demand $3.99–8.19/GPU/h, reserved $3.09–7.99. Fine-tuning $0.48–8.00 per million tokens (minimum $4/job). Storage $0.16/GiB/month. Free tier available to get started.

Sources: together.ai · together.ai

Hugging Face

The library of the open AI world: over a million models and datasets, plus hosted demos (Spaces) and a router to inference providers.

  • Free tier
  • no sign-up
  • local
Details

Looking up which open model exists and what it can do — and trying demos before paying anyone.

For it

  • The core index of open AI — practically every open model lives here
  • Spaces: demos run in the browser, many of them free (ZeroGPU)
  • Inference Providers: one point of access, many providers (fal, Together, Replicate and others behind it)
  • At $9/month, PRO is very cheap for what you get

Against it

  • Confusing for non-developers; the interface is a workbench, not a product
  • Spaces are often overloaded or broken (community demos)

Pricing: Free account available (Spaces CPU Basic: 2 vCPU / 16 GB, ZeroGPU with dynamic resources). PRO $9/month (10× private storage, 20× inference credits, 8× ZeroGPU allowance). Team $20/user/month. Enterprise $50/user/month. Spaces hardware $0.03/hr (CPU Upgrade) to $23.50/hr (8× L40S). Inference Endpoints from $0.033/hr (CPU) to $74/hr (B200). Storage $8–18/TB/month depending on volume and public/private.

Sources: huggingface.co

Comfy Cloud (comfy.org)

ComfyUI in the cloud — straight from the ComfyUI makers: the node editor runs in the browser on rented GPUs, without a local install.

  • Paid only
  • local
Details

Running ComfyUI workflows without owning a machine with a beefy GPU — and with the original team behind it.

For it

  • From the original team — not a third-party copy; updates land here first
  • You're only billed for active GPU time while the workflow runs, not idle time
  • Extra credits valid for a year (not 90 days like with the consumer aggregators)

Against it

  • No free tier — entry is $20/month
  • Node editor: steep learning curve, nothing for occasional users
  • Minimum payout $100 — with little traffic the first payout takes a while

Pricing: No free tier. Standard $20/month (4,200 credits/month, ~380 videos of 5 sec., 30 min. max runtime per workflow, 1 parallel workflow via API) · Creator $35/month (7,400 credits, ~670 videos, custom LoRAs importable, 3 parallel workflows) · Pro $100/month (21,100 credits, ~1,915 videos, 1 h max runtime, 5 parallel workflows) · Enterprise on request. Extra credits purchasable anytime, valid 1 year.

Sources: comfy.org · comfy.org

RunComfy

Hosted ComfyUI plus a model playground and trainer — a third-party cloud that rents out ComfyUI machines by the hour and offers ready-made model APIs alongside.

  • Paid only
Details

When you want to run ComfyUI by the hour on large GPUs (up to H200) and also need ready-made model endpoints.

For it

  • Three things on one balance: ready-made models, ComfyUI machines and a trainer
  • Broad GPU selection from T4/A4000 up to H200
  • The Pro subscription brings a noticeable discount (20%+) plus $10 monthly credit and 200 GB persistent storage
  • Serverless API for ComfyUI workflows (docs.runcomfy.com) — you can run your own workflows as an endpoint

Against it

  • Purchased credit expires after 365 days
  • The Pro subscription does NOT replace the credit — you still need a balance to use it
  • Since Comfy.org runs its own cloud, the case for third-party providers has gotten narrower

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go without a subscription, shared balance across Models/ComfyUI/Trainer. GPU examples: Medium (T4, A4000) $0.99/h standard or $0.79/h with Pro · 3X-Large (H200) $9.59/h standard or $7.66/h with Pro. Model APIs: image $0.03–0.04/image, video $0.03–0.10/second. Pro subscription $19.99/month (annual $239.90, 33% savings): 20%+ GPU discount, 20 free CPU hours/month, $10 monthly credit, 200 GB persistent storage. Credit expires after 365 days.

Sources: runcomfy.com · docs.runcomfy.com

ThinkDiffusion

Hosted Stable Diffusion interfaces (Automatic1111, ComfyUI) in the browser — spin up a machine, work, shut it down, pay by the hour.

  • Paid only
Details

For it

  • Cleanly handled via Rewardful, monthly payout via Wise
  • Application takes only 24–48 hours, participation is free
  • Low barrier to entry: hourly from under $1, no forced subscription

Against it

  • The focus is still heavily on Stable Diffusion interfaces; the model landscape has moved on
  • Hourly rates add up fast if you leave the machine running
  • Some of the prices below rest on secondary sources — double-check the pricing page yourself

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go, hourly by machine tier. Per third-party sources: FAST from $0.59/h · RAPID $0.99/h · TURBO $1.75/h. Cheaper with a TD Pro subscription (RAPID $0.79/h, TURBO $1.40/h). ⚠️ Figures from secondary sources — check thinkdiffusion.com/pricing yourself, the machine tiers change with the models.

Sources: thinkdiffusion.com · thinkdiffusion.com · aihungry.com

RunPod

GPU cloud for rent — pods (whole machines) and serverless endpoints; the layer UNDERNEATH many of the aggregators listed here.

  • Paid only
  • commercial ok
  • EU
Details

Anyone who needs a whole GPU machine (training, ComfyUI, own models) instead of a ready-made model API.

For it

  • Cheaper than the hyperscalers; the community cloud cheaper still
  • Serverless and pods from one source — ComfyUI templates run out of the box

Against it

  • Cash only from 25 paying referrals up (then 10% via PartnerStack) — a high bar
  • Credits expire after 90 days

Pricing: Pay-per-use by GPU type and hour (pods) or per second (serverless); prices vary widely by GPU and cloud type — check runpod.io/pricing for current figures.

Sources: docs.runpod.io · runpod.io · runpod.io

Runware

Price-aggressive inference API for image and video with a very large model catalog — the cheap alternative to fal and Replicate.

  • Paid only
Details

Image generation at volume, when price per image is the deciding criterion.

For it

  • By far the cheapest provider in the category for images (FLUX Schnell from $0.0006/image)
  • Very large model catalog (their own figure: 300,000+ models)
  • Failed requests are not billed

Against it

  • Less well known — recommending it takes more explaining
  • API only, no interface for non-developers
  • Price range very wide ($0.0006–0.24/image) — the cheap numbers apply to the small models

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go. Image generation $0.0006–0.24 per image depending on model, resolution and quality (examples: FLUX Schnell $0.0006, SD 3 $0.0019). Failed requests are free. Details: runware.ai/pricing or runware.ai/docs/platform/pricing.

Sources: runware.ai · runware.ai · techsy.io

TypingMind

Standalone chat interface for your own API keys — you pay once for the software and after that only the tokens to the labs.

  • Paid only
  • EU
Details

Developers with their own API keys who don't want a monthly subscription

For it

  • One-time purchase instead of a subscription — significantly cheaper over time than $20/month if you have API keys anyway
  • Your own keys = the data goes straight to the model provider, no additional middleman
  • All providers in one interface (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google …)

Against it

  • Requires your own API keys → too complicated for non-technical users
  • Small team, small ecosystem

Pricing: One-time purchase model for the software; ongoing costs arise only through your own API keys with the model providers. Check exact prices on typingmind.com (not cleanly readable → deliberately left unsourced here).

Sources: docs.typingmind.com · custom.typingmind.com · lemonsqueezy.com

As of July 2026 — prices change, check with the provider.

Who I follow

The people who actually shape this space — established names and newcomers. Filter by platform: different people are strong on each.

35 people

  • Sam Altman

    Sam Altman

    CEO von OpenAI (ChatGPT).

    Der meistbeachtete Firmenchef der Branche; setzt auf X regelmäßig die Agenda für die gesamte KI-Debatte.

  • Dario Amodei

    Dario Amodei

    Mitgründer und CEO von Anthropic (Claude).

    Prägt mit Essays und Interviews die Diskussion um Sicherheit, Skalierung und den Zeithorizont von KI.

  • Demis Hassabis

    Demis Hassabis

    Mitgründer und CEO von Google DeepMind, Nobelpreisträger für Chemie.

    Verbindet Spitzenforschung (AlphaFold, Gemini) mit Wissenschaft; eine der glaubwürdigsten Stimmen zur Forschungsseite.

  • Andrej Karpathy

    Andrej Karpathy

    KI-Forscher, ehemals OpenAI und Tesla-Autopilot-Chef.

    Erklärt neuronale Netze und LLMs von Grund auf; seine kostenlosen Deep-Dive-Videos sind Pflichtstoff für Einsteiger wie Profis.

  • Yann LeCun

    Yann LeCun

    KI-Pionier, Turing-Award-Träger, NYU-Professor (zuvor Metas Chef-KI-Wissenschaftler).

    Deep-Learning-Mitbegründer und prominenteste Gegenstimme zum reinen LLM-Hype; argumentiert für 'World Models'.

  • Fei-Fei Li

    Fei-Fei Li

    Stanford-Professorin und Mitgründerin/CEO von World Labs.

    'Mutter' von ImageNet; führende Stimme zu räumlicher Intelligenz sowie zu Ethik und Politik rund um KI.

  • Ilya Sutskever

    Ilya Sutskever

    OpenAI-Mitgründer, jetzt CEO von Safe Superintelligence Inc. (SSI).

    Einer der einflussreichsten Forscher der Ära; seine seltenen Posts zu 'safe superintelligence' werden branchenweit gelesen.

  • Andrew Ng

    Andrew Ng

    KI-Pionier, Gründer von DeepLearning.AI und Autor von „The Batch"

    Einer der einflussreichsten KI-Lehrer der Welt, nüchtern und fundiert.

  • Jim Fan (Linxi Fan)

    Director of AI bei NVIDIA, Co-Lead von Project GR00T und GEAR Lab.

    Eine der aktivsten Praktiker-Stimmen zu Robotik und 'Physical AI'; erklärt Forschung anschaulich auf X.

  • Two Minute Papers (Károly Zsolnai-Fehér)

    Unabhängiger KI-Erklärer, ehem. Forscher an der TU Wien.

    Macht aktuelle Forschungspapiere in kurzen, begeisterten Videos verständlich – der Klassiker unter den KI-Kanälen.

  • Matt Wolfe

    KI-YouTuber und Kurator (FutureTools.io).

    Praxisnahe Wochenüberblicke: was neu ist, was zählt und welche Tools man wirklich benutzen kann.

  • Fireship (Jeff Delaney)

    Entwickler-YouTuber mit KI- und Coding-Fokus.

    Schnelle, witzige 'Code Report'-Videos ordnen KI-News aus Entwicklersicht ein; riesige Reichweite unter Programmierern.

  • Lex Fridman

    Lex Fridman

    Podcast-Host mit langen KI-Interviews (u.a. Altman, Amodei, Hassabis)

    Bringt die Köpfe hinter der KI in langen, zugänglichen Gesprächen ans breite Publikum.

  • Yannic Kilcher

    ML-Forscher und Erklärer, promoviert an der ETH Zürich.

    Technische, ungeschönte Paper-Analysen für ein Publikum, das die Mathematik hinter den Modellen verstehen will.

  • AI Explained

    Anonymer KI-Erklärkanal.

    Ruhige, gründlich recherchierte Analysen neuer Modelle und Benchmarks – Substanz statt Hype, schnell gewachsen.

  • bycloud

    KI-Research-YouTuber und Newsletter-Autor.

    Aufstrebende Stimme, die aktuelle LLM-Forschung technisch aber zugänglich aufbereitet.

  • Matthew Berman

    KI-YouTuber (Forward Future), News und Tutorials.

    Schnell wachsender Kanal mit Modell-Tests, Agenten-Demos und täglichen News – gut für Einsteiger und Builder.

  • Simon Willison

    Simon Willison

    Entwickler und LLM-Kommentator, Django-Mitschöpfer.

    Einer der klarsten unabhängigen Beobachter: testet neue Modelle hands-on und dokumentiert Praxis-Erkenntnisse ungefiltert.

  • swyx (Shawn Wang)

    Mitgründer von AI Engineer, Co-Host des Latent-Space-Podcasts.

    Prägte den Begriff 'AI Engineer'; zentrale Stimme der Praktiker-Community, die KI-Produkte tatsächlich baut.

  • Rowan Cheung

    Gründer des meistgelesenen KI-Newsletters „The Rundown AI"

    Fasst die wichtigsten KI-News täglich in einen Fünf-Minuten-Read.

  • Ethan Mollick

    Wharton-Professor, schreibt den Substack „One Useful Thing"

    Übersetzt aktuelle KI-Forschung wie kaum jemand in praktischen, alltagstauglichen Nutzen.

  • Nathan Lambert

    Post-Training-Forscher bei Ai2, schreibt den Substack „Interconnects"

    Bester zugänglicher Blick auf Modelltraining, RLHF und offene Modelle.

  • Zvi Mowshowitz

    Zvi Mowshowitz

    Schreibt den wöchentlichen KI-Digest „Don't Worry About the Vase"

    Umfassendster Wochenüberblick über alles, was in der KI-Welt passiert.

  • Gary Marcus

    Gary Marcus

    KI-Forscher und NYU-Professor emeritus, schreibt „Marcus on AI"

    Prominenteste kritische Stimme, wichtig als Gegengewicht zum Hype.

  • Allie K. Miller

    Meistgefolgte KI-Business-Stimme, Ex-Amazon und Ex-IBM

    Erklärt KI-Anwendung fürs Business massentauglich über LinkedIn, Instagram und TikTok.

  • Bilawal Sidhu

    Ex-Google-XR-Creator und Host von „The TED AI Show"

    Zeigt generative und räumliche KI-Tools verständlich und kreativ, stark auf Instagram.

  • Dwarkesh Patel

    Dwarkesh Patel

    Podcaster mit tief recherchierten KI- und Wissenschafts-Interviews

    Stellt die bestvorbereiteten, schärfsten Fragen der KI-Szene.

  • Sarah Guo

    Sarah Guo

    KI-Investorin (Conviction) und Co-Host des Podcasts „No Priors"

    Investoren-Perspektive auf KI-Gründer und -Trends aus erster Hand.

  • Nathaniel Whittemore (NLW)

    Nathaniel Whittemore (NLW)

    Host des täglichen Podcasts „The AI Daily Brief"

    Tägliche, verständliche Einordnung der KI-News für ein breites Publikum.

  • Riley Brown

    „Vibe-Coding"-Creator, zeigt App-Bau mit KI auf TikTok und Instagram

    Macht KI-gestütztes Programmieren für Nicht-Techniker greifbar.

  • Nathan Labenz

    Host des Podcasts „The Cognitive Revolution", KI-Analyst

    Detaillierte Gespräche mit den Machern und Forschern hinter den Modellen.

  • Zain Kahn

    Gründer des KI-Produktivitäts-Newsletters „Superhuman AI"

    KI-Produktivität für Berufstätige, knackig und direkt anwendbar.

  • Heather Cooper

    Kreativ-KI-Expertin, schreibt den Substack „Visually AI"

    Anlaufstelle für visuelle und generative KI-Tools und Workflows.

  • Linus Ekenstam

    KI-Creator und Gründer, teilt Tools und Experimente

    Praktische, visuelle KI-Experimente und ehrliche Tool-Einordnungen.

  • Rachel Woods

    Ex-Meta-Data-Scientist, Gründerin von „The AI Exchange"

    Zeigt, wie Teams KI praktisch in ihre Arbeitsabläufe einbauen.

Image credits

Portraits from Wikimedia Commons under a free licence. Anyone missing here has no freely licensed image — a monogram stands in.

What I learned researching this — about money

This page is meant to earn money, through partner programmes. I’d rather say it than hide it.

Except: the research turned up something I didn’t expect. The tools I’d most likely recommend pay nothing. OpenAI has no partner programme. Neither does Anthropic. Nor Google. Nor Midjourney. Nor Black Forest Labs. Leonardo had one and shut it down in April 2026.

And the numbers floating around for the programmes that do exist are largely invented. I had every figure checked. “Runway pays 20% recurring” — Runway publishes no terms at all. “Cursor pays 20%” — Cursor has no paid programme. “Lovable pays 30% recurring” — Lovable pays once. Those numbers sit in dozens of blogs, all copied from the same directories.

That’s why this page carries not a single commission figure. Only whether a tool has a programme.

And the important part: the order here has nothing to do with who pays. If the best tool for a job earns me nothing, it still goes at the top. A recommendation list sorted by commission isn’t a recommendation list — it’s a catalogue, and you can tell.

How this page grows

It isn’t finished and never will be. Individual tasks will turn into their own posts — “Create AI video, free and without signing up”, “Can I use AI music commercially?” — linking back here.

If you know something that’s missing: write to me.